• azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jumper. It was setting up an interesting world with more depth than the first movie could delve. I loved that one of the characters was so cool that the author of the original novel went out and wrote another book just about the movie’s character and it rocked.

  • Moriarty@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A sequel to Prometheus that actually focused on getting answers from the engineers. Covenant had an interesting performance from Fassbender but nothing else.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Prometheus should have had it’s stand-alone universe. They fucked up by bolting xenomorphs onto it, and all the baggage that came with them.

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just as they say Starbucks coffee is coffee for people who don’t like coffee, I’ve concluded that Prometheus was an Alien film for people who don’t like Alien films.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m in the opposite camp, lol. I feel like Prometheus and Covenant both were deeply unnecessary. The most hurtful thing you can do for a horror franchise is add too much detail. Even if it is as weird and convoluted as Prometheus and Covenant

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The trouble with the movie was that the studio got scared out of continuing by fundamentalist Christian groups who really objected to the central premise of the books; namely that God can be killed and all life will be better off for it.

      They then fumbled the shit out of it, editing it so poorly that what they did make was a jumble of shit that no one who wasn’t familiar with the stories would care to see, and no one who loved the books would be happy with. For me it was shit like revealing Lyra’s parentage right at the beginning, rather than it being a huge surprise as in the books.

      It was a massive shame though, because the casting was damn near perfect. If they’d got Sam Elliott back to reprise the role of Lee Scorseby for the BBC adaptation, I’d have been as happy as a pig in shit. To my mind he is Lee. Lin Manuel Miranda was fine, but lacked the essential taciturn nature of the character as written. And Sir Ian McKellan as Iorek? Perfect.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As far as I can remember the Movie did terrible, especially since it didn’t really stick to the source material

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Daemons and talking polar bears. I was sold.

        I personally am not bothered by sticking to the source material or not. Books and movies are fundamentally different.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m usually fine with not everything from the book making it to the movie, but changes to the plot need to be very well reasoned for. There were for example a lot of changes to the structure of LotR when Jackson adapted it, but they didn’t change the overall plot or message, mostly just restructured it.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve never read the series but the His Dark Materials television show is really well produced. Not sure how closely it follows the books but as far as I understand it’s pretty faithfully executed.

  • graham1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. It did quite well when it came out, and it felt like there was potential for sequels

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m surprised nobody has done a modern TV version. All five books have been successfully adapted for radio, the scripts are done, it’s already blocked out into well-paced individual episodes. It’s just sitting there waiting to be made. You just need a good cast and a show runner who isn’t going to monkey with the source material. It’s already proven to be popular and long-lived. Seems like a no-brainer.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        All five books have been successfully adapted for radio

        As far as I’m aware, the first two radio series predate the books. So, in fact, they were successfully adapted into print.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Which I didn’t like at all, it felt too much like an audiobook to me, reading all the guide bits, not like an adaptation. Looks like you can never satisfy all fans at once.

    • turddle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ohh that’s a good one. The other books afterwards were great too.

      Would’ve loved a sequel and would honestly not mind them artistically fudging it a bit to pick back up with an older Arthur Dent

        • BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I believe Adams himself considered each different medium to be “it’s own story” though just as he added and changed things from the radio play for the book, he also added and changed things in the movie screen play… When he was involved in it. I’m not going to pretend it was all his work but it was it’s own thing.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And the book wasn’t living up to the original radio series

          Mostly kidding on that

          I agree that I like the book better, initially I disliked the movie, but I’ve come around on it, some things from the radio series were changed for the book, and so it just kind of feels right they’d further change things for the movie. Playing a little fast and loose with it feels very in the Douglass Adams spirit to me.

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Douglas Adams writing doesn’t translate well to film I think, a bit like Pratchett’s. It can be done (Good Omens was a great adaptation of Pratchett) but it’s probably super hard to do well and keep the original feeling/spirit

          • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The 1981 TV series did a fine job, likely in no small part thanks to having Adams himself around and involved.

            I feel like any future HHG adaptation would need to be TV rather than theatrical film. That universe is just too full to condense meaningfully into a 90-minute blockbuster meant to keep the Hollywood lowest common denominator in their seats. You need room for all the multilayered apparently-random stuff interacting with each other in the particularly bizarre ways Adams was so good at pulling off, and it needs to capture the whimsy of the source material without devolving into the unremarkable formulaic stuff the latest TV attempt to do Dirk Gently on TV turned out to be.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There were plans, with the daughter joining the family business.

      FUBAR on Netflix isn’t terrible since it plays some of the same keys as True Lies, and it got renewed for a second season…but it’s painfully obvious that Arnold is too old for this stuff anymore.

      They tried a TV reboot adaptation of True Lies. It was baaad

    • Eldbogi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I once read that they planned on a sequel but then the terrorist attacks on the world trade center happened so they cancelled it.

      Something about not wanting to make fun of terrorism anymore.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The novel Jumper by Steven Gould, on which the film Jumper was based, spawned a continuing series that went on for a while and kept being pretty good. For the hell of it the author also wrote Jumper: Griffin’s Story which wasn’t part of the novel continuity, instead it was a prequel to the movie.

      https://www.goodreads.com/series/49082-jumper

    • Nadru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They did the series impulse which is in the same universe but only 2 seasons if I’m not mistaken.

      The movie was cool

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but before the director made several more movies that were all bad. I don’t know how he keeps getting work.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, that’s another that makes no sense to me. People largely dislike all his recent works. “Let’s give him a huge budget for a two part star wars fan fic!”

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Snyder has an amazing eye for action. Sucker Punch, 300, and Watchmen were all amazing visual/auditory feasts. Everything else about his movies is just average to below average, though.

              Giving him a Star Wars makes perfect sense when you consider what Disney thinks of the Star Wars audience. “Just give them laser sword and space ships and explosions and they’ll be happy.”

              • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Blomkamp is better in every way. I think he got blacklisted because the money guys didn’t like his social commentary.

                • roofuskit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Blokamp is great at effects and story ideas, he’s not a good director. Even District 9 is a bit of a directorial mess but there’s enough interesting story there to overcome that. The rest of his films? Not so much.

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean, stupid teenage boys will spend what money they have to hang out with their friends… So, it’s a viable audience.

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I might be in the minority but Chappie was a really good movie. It’s a real bummer Die Antword were so horrible to work with that the director kinda gave up on it.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Funny story. I happen to have a bunch of Crimson Skies toys sitting in a box, all unopened. There was a comic shop near my job and they had a clear-out table that sold unpopular items at a steep discount. I got a bunch of T-shirts and other stuff, and liked the Crimson Skies stuff. For a buck each, why not?