• DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And that despite charging for it, they fill many versions of it with adverts, install without asking bloatware and crap paid for by other companies to shove down your throat, and also sells your personal information to (checks) at least 801 third parties.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hey! Those 801 third parties are trusted third parties. All of them were properly vetted when they said they wouldn’t misuse our personal data.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s a Triad-backed Catonese place near me that makes crab rangoons with actual crab in them. They are fantastic.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Well, if it’s good enough for the triads, I guess I’m on board I won’t ask any more questions…

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fun fact, they aren’t called crab Rangoon’s because they’re supposed to include crab meat. That’s called that because when they’re folded up on four sides they look a bit like crabs.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There used to be apps in the iOS app store that were nothing but a big “I’m rich” symbol. They would be listed for some shit like $10,000 in the app store and all they did was,at best, have a button that played a sound to indicate that you were in fact rich lol.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those “I’m rich” apps basically tested the app store price limit which was set to $9,999 (don’t know if it’s different now). Brilliant idea really.

      I put this in the same category as the “Million dollar homepage” where some guy asked for $1 a pixel and hosted a page with the results. Something smart that if it gets enough attention could make someone good money for not a lot of work. And generally something that will only work once as copycats won’t be seen to have the same value.

  • Venicone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not useless as such but a wallpaper app or something that expects you to pay £5.99 a month to use. Fuck all the way off with that

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    90% of b2b software. They literally charge thousands of dollars while giving the worse piece of shit software you’ve ever used.

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh fuck yeah! So much of my research into new tools is just checking to see if they have a demo, documentation, and price.

      When I’m looking for a new tool, I don’t have the time to schedule a “quick” 20 minute call to do introductions and schedule a follow-up hour long meeting followed by a quote sent over in an email days later only to find out the price is so far outside the range there is no way it’s ever going to happen!

      I’m not some useless middle manager looking for any excuse to look busy; I don’t have that kind of time to waste!

    • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sometimes the value add is security, sometimes scaling or uptime. Enterprise considerations aren’t necessarily the same as for individual consumers.

      Sometimes it’s just a dogshit product though, and the sales team pulled the wool over some execs eyes.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They always want to charge per user too instead of just charging a monthly fee. They’d rather have no money than not charge per user it’s actual crazy. Imagine any other industry turning away paying customers when it doesn’t cost them anything to have the customer. Software companies are insane. Can’t wait until their funding runs out.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oof. Yes!

      The proprietary cloud crap usually has worse or non-existent documentation, fewer features, and a terrible or non-existent API.

      But it comes with a salesperson. So there’s that.

      But people with cloud server orchestration skills are terrifyingly expensive right now, so self-hosting a better product can be a very hard sell.

      • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Salesperson is incredibly important. They take the person responsible for making the purchase decision out to lunch and for rounds of golf, after all!

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hmm really? Would proficiency with Terraform and knowledge of the services offered by at least one major cloud provider be considered “cloud server orchestration skills” or do you mean something more/different?

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep! My best guess is that maybe 1 in 10 organizations currently has any in-house orchestration skills on staff at all.

          (I’m just annecdotaly guessing based on my professional network, which is actually heavily biased towards organizations that have orchestration skills, but also based on job offers that my peers with orchestration skills are seeing.)

          And the ones that have it get to charge a premium for shitty cloud services to the ones that do not.

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s pretty crazy, good to know. We had a hard time hiring a “cloud engineer” last year ourselves, though for the client in question we were looking for deep Azure chops. I’ve been learning some Terraform for this reason so we can respond a bit better, sounds like I might be well served to focus on it. Feel like DM’ing with salaries / offers you’ve been hearing about, if you have?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I remember when the iPhone was new and my friend paid money for an app that simulates a mug of beer on the screen so you can pretend to drink it.

    That, but the entire genre of those fucking things cuz there are assloads of them now.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Novelty apps were practically the majority of what was out there in the early days of Android and iOS. I remember a lighter app, and an electric shaver app.

      My favorite novelty app was that marble maze game on iOS they used the accelerometer. I got really good at finishing those mazes in seconds, which upset my cousin because it was his phone and I demolished all his best times, lol. Only video game I was ever good at.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never really understood the imitation app developers. Like your first little run of the novelty, sure, makes sense, minimal effort that might pay itself off or even go viral, but why do the imitations think they have the same shot?

  • Like the wind...@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Spotify and apps like it. Imagine paying a subscription to a subpar selection of music when you could just download mp3s. Imagine having skipping a song being a privilege. Are you an abused kid? Is drinking water a privilege too? I paid once for BlackPlayer simply because it’s my favorite music player app. The most important features were free.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Imagine paying a subscription to a subpar selection of music when you could just download mp3s.

      Imagine having to go through the hassle of being at a computer and using whatever program you need to use to find the correct songs and then transfering them to your phone, when you could just find the song instantly, no matter where you are.

      I used to download tens of thousands of songs back in the day, Spotify is way more convienient, a price I’m perfectly fine paying.

      • Like the wind...@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I forgot I time traveled to 2006. The politics never changed so I thought I was still in 2025.

        Anyway in the future we have a thing called cloud storage where you could upload your whole music folder and download it on any device.

        As someone who makes music and listens to my own nonsense, I set a onedrive folder as my default location so I can export an mp3 while I’m showering and getting dressed and download the mp3 on my phone when I’m outside.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Downvoted for hating on Spotify. That’s just sad.

      I don’t care what crap Spotify offers; it’s well known they go out of their way to avoid paying royalties to the artists. They’re a leech, nothing more, and I will never support them.

        • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sometimes it does. Piracy drives up sales of traditional media (think: vinyl), as well as increasing crowd size at live performances. Also, merch sales scale with awareness of an artist. All of these things equal the payout of millions of plays on spoffy.

          • sour@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Except that using spotify does all of that as well.

            I’m not saying that spotify is good. But thinking piracy is better for the artist than spotify is delusional.

            • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m delusional, then. Spotify hasn’t paid me a red cent, but piracy has indirectly put money in my pocket and food on my table.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I down voted them for the weird tirade about privilege and being an abused kid. Idk wtf that has to do with hating spotify, but lemmy would look much better without that garbage in the comments.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like Spotify. I don’t often want to listen to an album. I want to listen to a vibe. It’s good for that, and for introducing me to new bands and music.

      But yeah, if you’re just using it to listen to one album at a time, and you know which album you want, then you’re using the wrong service.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What if you want to listen to something you didn’t have the foresight to pirate locally first?

      Music streaming is very convenient, even easier than piracy.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with you in theory, and in practice for most people. I have weird enough tastes in music though that I haven’t found a single streaming service that has what I want.

      • Like the wind...@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If I like the song, I download it when I have internet or mobile data. I support the creators in other ways if possible. $1 from one fan is the equivalent of like 13 million streams from them. I’m not paying to avoid ten minutes of obnoxious ads every time I want to listen to music. Anyway, they found Like the Wind, and it absolutely slaps so I’ll download it on my phone.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I sail the high seas quite often. I also pay for spotify because it’s stupid easy.

    • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Subpar selection? I can count on the fingers of one hand the songs I have found on other sources but not Spotify.

      I don’t even pay for Spotify, but I still use it to find new music because it’s hands down the best way to do so. I create a playlist of all the new songs I want and then purchase them all when Bandcamp Friday rolls around. I’m getting all the benefits of Spotify without paying them a cent (my ad blocker even works on it too), plus being as supportive as possible to the artists themselves.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What adblocker are you using? I got to the point where on FF with uBlock Origin Spotify just fails and mobile apps are 50/50 with NextDNS

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I recently tried out an “LED banner” (called LED scroller in the google play store) app that lets you scroll text on your screen. Pretty cool, I would totally pay $5 or maybe even $10 for it. In the free version, I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many ads in such a short period of time. The paid version was $15 PER WEEK. That’s $780 per year. To scroll some text. It’s the only app I’ve ever bothered to post a review for.

    • cashsky@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds like a front for either blatant adware or malware with botted reviews/downloads to bring it to the top in search results. I can’t image there isn’t a free app that does this.

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s just fishing. For every 10 users that notice the deceptive “free trial then bills per week” model, there’s a guy who doesn’t notice until he’s been charged $15 and cancels. And for every ten of that guy, there’s a guy that doesn’t notice for a month, and for every ten of that guy there’s the rare whale who looks at their $700/mo “google bill” and goes yeah that sounds about right.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I remember writing one of those using a bitmap font from some Arduino LCD driver program and publishing it for free on the Android store. Someone offered £50 for the source code and I wonder if they’re related.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    it’s not an entire app but, discord profile decorations.

    The fact it costs money isn’t surprising, but the amount of money charged is hilarious.

    17$ for some graphics that some look like they took about 20 minutes to make. Just to make your profile look different than everyone elses. Then the “discount” given for having nitro for it is even more laughable.

    Whats equally insane is that people fall for it. I know some people that have easily spent 60$ on profile decorations. Spending equal or greater than the cost of discord nitro is insane to me, even if the decoration doesn’t expire.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      On a similar note, skins and other cosmetics in video games that do nothing to help with camouflage—or worse—make you stand out more. Never understood why people waste money on that.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Difference is that that shit sometimes looks cool as hell and you see your skin constantly while playing(at least if you play in third person). You won’t stare at your profile picture for hours.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Early days of of micro-transactions did help you blend in more, but I noticed they started diverging away, leaving the more natural camos to be unlocked by gameplay, and the obnoxious/distracting ones as a premium.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Holy fuck, as if I needed more reasons to hate Discord… back when I thought it was just a new iteration of xFire I still hated it but could at least see a purpose for it, but it doesn’t even do all the shit xFire could

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Xfire was the shit. I’d have paid a couple bucks a month for it, instead of it just dying. It was so crazy ahead of its time. Text chat, voice, game detection and tracking, clans, server browsing, broadcasting, pic and video hosting…

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      what bothers me even more than the price is that they all suck, and none of them fit my aesthetic. I could make my own decorations, and I’m offended that discord won’t let me.

    • Oberyn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also how discord dœs stickers . Like custom emojes , they’re tied to discord servers , unless you have nitro then you can use them everywhere . Such BS system , shoulda done them how LINE dœs them : you only need to buy the sticker pack once then you use them anywhere , no shitty subscription needed !

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing that I find insane is having to pay for Nitro to have an animated .gif as your profile pic.

      …The animation is played client-side, so literally costs Discord nothing to do this, and as a matter of fact it’s actually more effort for them to intentionally block animations from playing until you pony up than just letting the browser container the app runs in natively do its thing. Given that the Discord app itself is basically just a glorified webview container with some stuff bolted onto it.

      • randint ランディント@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t want to sound like I’m on Discord’s side (I dislike nitro too), but that’s honestly just how a lot of paid add-on features on free apps work. They take away some functionality from the free one to incentivize people to pay.

  • Writerly Gal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sims freeplay. Haven’t used it for a long time but it sure asks for a LOT of money for a free game 😂

  • kaprap@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Real Debrid

    Touted as necessary when it isn’t, apparently if you have it you have access to a huge cache that you can use to continue to torrent dead files

    The issue is that most files nowadays are torrented anyway, so it’s essentially just a ‘do it because I told you so’ step for torrentio users.

    Other torrent streaming software don’t even need real Debrid.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I discovered it only a while ago and during that time it has been clearly neutered. It just doesn’t work for stuff like it used to.

      Most likely copyright strikes caught up to it

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A few months ago they got told to quit it so they were like “oh shit apparently there are PIRATES using our piracy service. We never wanted THOSE GUYS as our customers!” and started neutering piracy, which was clearly their main source of income.

    • cashsky@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t it kind of a middle-man service so you don’t get narc’d on by your ISP for large amounts of p2p traffic? That way all your ISP sees is you downloading data from one source rather than lots of.p2p traffic.

      Unless you use vpn obviously, that doesn’t have issues with p2p traffic or whatever.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me, any office apps. Never worked in an office, never wanted to. None of that stuff. Even if it’s free, if it gets installed with the distro, it’s the first thing that gets tossed.