• RampageDon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just assumed the Netflix top 10 were movies/shows they were trying to push, not based on actual veiwership.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s a bingo. Any “trending” algorithm is designed to get you to click on it. It’s not a source of accurate information.

      It’s the same with search results. You’re searching for X? Here’s something X-adjacent we’ve been paid to show you that you might click on while looking for X. We’re going to call it “what others buy” and hope you do, too.

      • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It really bothers me because I want to buy actual good quality stuff but I have no idea how to find it because I don’t trust any reviews or anything on search engines at all really.

        • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is one of the big things that killed Amazon for me. They used to have a great search and filter function that was designed to make it as easy as possible to find what you were looking for. Now it’s designed to find things that are related to your search and ignore your filters when sellers pay them to promote their product. Combined with the fake reviews and the ocean of low quality trash that fills 95% of their inventory, it’s now actually easier to drive to a store and search shelves manually than it is to sit and click.

          And don’t get me started on AI generated “reviews” that are just reworded marketing material with affiliate links. It used to be that google could get you some relatively reliable sources, but most of those have long since replaced real reviews with this bullshit. At this point, I just assume every review is a lie unless I see a video of a human testing the product while taking about it.

          I honestly think that anyone who is making money by misleading consumers with product reviews that aren’t actually based on some interaction with the product should be in prison for fraud.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Top 7 “All” of all time on Lemmy, as seen by my instance:

            None younger than 10 months old, on a platform largely only about 12 months old in total. So once again, not really representative of the lifetime of the site, or what the site is like today.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                No posts about open source. Nothing queer. No tankies or even leftist. I wouldn’t say that the best representation of today’s Lemmy.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe that they have said the top 10 is based on views, but haven’t given the windoww for that count or whether the thimbs up/down ratings factor into it. That seems plausible as it is promoted as a popularity indicator and tends to have recent additons and already popular stuff listed.

      Now the trending category is most likely the stuff they are trying to promote.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t get why the streaming services would care what media people watch. Are they pushing stuff that is cheaper to license?

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They want to get recommendations just good enough to keep you hooked. If they show you just the objectively best, you would instantly know after seeing the best ones, that the rest of the catalogue is worse and worse.

        This is how Netflix was in the beginning. I actually unsubscribed for a while for yhis reason. Now I’m as hooked as ever, there might still be a few good ones out there - I just need to keep scrolling for a few hours. /s

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          80% (being generous) of Netflix is low quality Netflix produced trash they try and get you to watch so they don’t have to pay royalties or commissions to anyone.

          I gave it up years ago.

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I never trusted that list from the getgo. Why wouldn’t they use it to promote certain content? It would be wasted opportunity if they didn’t.

    • penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Absolutely. Ever since shitflix removed the star ratings and reviews that were done by real people, I stopped believing any of that “top list” bullshit.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    When it doesn’t occur to you that the list is made up entirely by Netflix to get that engagement, really making it the “Top Ten Things Netflix Wants You To Watch Right Now, Please” list.

      • whoisthedoktor@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        TV and streaming sucks. Movies suck. I’ve seen so many of them in the past that there’s really nothing new out there that’s any good any more because it’s all just rehashing and reimagining the past. Same with gaming. Same with books. And music. We’re so buried under a ton of entertainment that we can just stop making new entertainment and watch everything done in the past and still have enough to last us our entire lifetime. So what’s the point? If we’re going to have streaming, give us everything old – EVERYTHING – for a very low cost or free with limited ads and stop making new shit for your platform, all on one service.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I hear this a lot and do understand the sentiment but oh man in the last 3-4 years there have been so many great original and lower budget not blockbuster movies that have come out it’s great. Horror has really had a renaissance in the last 3 years with fresh ideas and plenty of new actors who are very good. It’s just not the things that are ever advertised a ton and probably have to scrounge through trailer YouTube’s to find them or sign up for newsletters. Some examples from recent years are Barbarian (2022), Infinity Pool (2023), Monkey Man (2024), The Holdovers (2023) and Perfect Days (2024).

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The comments here are enlightening. In a dismaying sort of way.

    It seems nothing drives a wedge between all people in a community than algorithms like the Netflix Top Ten. Everybody eyeing everyone else with suspicion, when actually no one is actually watching that crap.

        • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it’s not an Oscar winner, but it wasn’t so bad that I lost interest.

          Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she’s just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I’ll check it out.

            65 is also really good.

            • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well it’s still JLo. If you aren’t much a fan you won’t be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.

              That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.

              Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It’s basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.

              If they can give a fairly believable performance I’m impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don’t look like a dumbass in post.

              65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Godzilla minus one is currently dominating that and I absolutely agree with that choice!

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And the sheer amount of weird pseudo-reality-show-shovelware! Good grief, people! If you want made up content that’s supposed to look like the real thing, watch porn!

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          His early videos that got him popular were insane and novel. I watched them from curiosity. As for why he’s still… I have no idea. I don’t know anyone who watches him. It can’t just be kids.

          • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Roblox has completed its long-awaited direct listing on the NYSE, with shares closing at $69.47 for a fully diluted value of $45.3 billion—a gargantuan valuation for a video game company that rose to prominence and saw massive growth during the pandemic

            Why exactly can’t it just be kids?

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wanna take a minute to plug criterion channel. Objectively the value is worse than Netflix. But they have an amazing collection of films nonetheless. I put their 24/7 channel on and just watch whatever is on. Never in a million years thought I would be into classic French cinema.

    On a side rant fuck the French and their films! They drop you right into a situation with no clear good or bad guys. The films have meandering plots that go nowhere because why would they!?!? At the end there’s no resolution, just an empty chasam in your soul you’ve somehow overlooked your entire existence. And the worst part is they just put “fin” up on the screen and that’s that. Fuckin foreign nonsense

    There’s all sorts of treasures, may be worth a peek.

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember when Netflix had a million dollar competition to improve their recommendation system by something like 10%? Remember when they had user ratings and reviews? Remember when they threw it all in the fucking trash?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The original recommendation engine was amazing. Showed me stuff I loved that I would have never found myself. My favorite example is the French claymation acid trip called “A Town Named Panic”

      Now all I get recommended are shows that are cancelled and that I’ve already watched.

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The goal isn’t to give you stuff you want to watch, the goal is to do just enough that is just good enough to keep the highest amount of users subscribed. We like to think those are the same thing and they are usually aligned, but don’t have to be. It’s better for Netflix if you find those slower and just keep coming back to look around, kind of like some frustrating streaming gatcha game.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It keeps trying to get me to watch the new Zack Snyder Star Wars rip-off.

    I watched the first one. I’d take a prostate exam by Edward Scissorhands before I waste another two hours of my life on the sequel.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rebel Moon. Oh yeah, they’re so bad. And apparently a third one is on the way, and the extended cuts for all of them.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” – Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

        “LOL just grab all that shit off the cutting room floor. Four hours sounds about right for a movie!” – Zack Snyder

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel that way when I see YouTube shorts. Some of them are big titted girls doing shit which I can understand why those get clicked on but a lot of it I can’t even figure out what is supposed to be happening.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        can’t even figure out what is supposed to happening

        big titted girls

        Well there’s your answer