• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The crazy thing was Vista was great with good hardware. The huge problem it had was strong security. Everything was locked down and required admin elevation to change.

    You know how Linux requires su for every system change and everyone thinks that’s fine? That was Vista but it enraged techies to click an ok box for su.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Iirc, tasks requiring elevated permissions wasn’t the main complaint, maybe just one of the most vocal ones.

      Even with good hardware, it was not optimized for performance in general. This was amplified by the fact they also marketed Vista as having a wide range of older hardware support, which resulted in many users upgrading from XP only to have their performance absolutely tank. I think there was even a lawsuit because of how they marketed some devices as, “Vista ready.”

      Regardless, Vista was still better than Windows 8.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I wasn’t very old then but the main thing was RAM. Fuckers in Microsoft sales/marketing made 1 GB the minimum requirement for OEMs to install Vista.

        So guess what? Every OEM installed Vista with 1 GB of RAM and a 5200 RPM hard drive (the “standard” config for XP which is what most of those SKUs were meant to target). That hard drive would inevitably spend its short life thrashing because if you opened IE it would immediately start swapping. Even worse with OEM bloat, but even a clean Vista install would swap real bad under light web browsing.

        It was utterly unusable. Like, everything would be unbearably slow and all you could do was (slowly) open task manager and say “yep, literally nothing running, all nonessential programs killed, only got two tabs open, still swapping like it’s the sex party of the century”.

        “Fixing” those hellspawns by adding a spare DDR2 stick is a big part of how I learned to fix computer hardware. All ya had to do was chuck 30 € of RAM in there and suddenly Vista went from actually unusable to buttery smooth.

        By the time the OEMs wised up to Microsoft’s bullshit, Seven was around the corner so everyone thought Seven “fixed” the performance issues. It didn’t, it’s just that 2 GB of RAM had become the bare minimum standard by then.

        EDIT: Just installed a Vista VM because I ain’t got nothing better to do at 2 am apparently. Not connected to the internet, didn’t install a thing, got all of 12 processes listed by task manager, and it already uses 500 MB of RAM. Aero didn’t even enable as I didn’t configure graphics acceleration.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Can confirm 100%.

      During Vista’s heyday, I worked in a PC repair shop. All the ones that came in because “Vista sucks” were all Walmart specials with the bare minimum 512 MB RAM and crappy, bottom-of-the-barrel Seagate HDDs.

      The thing would start thrashing as soon it booted with the default assortment of bloatware. By the time they brought it in, the HDD was in rough shape which made the thrashing even worse.

      Fix was always to upgrade the RAM and, most often, replace the dying Seagate drive with a good one. Removing the bloatware helped as well once the root problems were addressed.

      The UAC stuff was also annoying, but those could be tuned.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yep, I did similar around the time. Can’t blame people for being mad that the thing they bought is damn near unusable (and was destined to be, but they didn’t understand that part). If someone buys a new bike, even if it’s cheap, it shouldn’t roll like you’re on gravel after a couple weeks and become impossible to pedal within months. But damn, there were a lot of horrible machines sold in those days.

        And then of course, the least fun part of that era, the guys who would bring their machines back weekly despite very stern warnings to stop visiting “those sites”.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          And then of course, the least fun part of that era, the guys who would bring their machines back weekly despite very stern warnings to stop visiting “those sites”.

          Hey, they were good for business lol

          Lady he's putting my kids through college

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Definitely not wrong! Especially once you’ve dialed in your routine of anti-malware utilities to run on pretty much everything. It’s like an antibiotic cocktail, lol. Or did you prefer the “back up and nuke on sight” approach?

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I’d usually start with my suite of cleanup tools, do some manual cleanup if needed, apply all the software and security updates, and then give it a day with some light test usage. Then I’d re-run the tools to see if they picked anything back up. If not, I released it back to the customer. If anything at all came back, I’d backup their data, pull all the product keys I could (Office, Photoshop, etc), nuke the OS, and reinstall what I could as close to the original as possible.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      this! i got my first vista experience on a laptop with a Turion and 2GB of RAM and it was really smooth. bit too chunky for my taste ux-wise but it was solid. first bluescreen i got on that machine was after installing W7.

      then the GPU melted its own solder after a few years and that machine was relegated to server duty.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember defending it online against a bunch of Linux users and I got told that the UAC prompt is overbearing while having to type your password is fine because it’s just “muscle memory”.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it enraged everyone, but when you’re already using a more secure system (Linux), the whiplash isn’t so surprising. Speaking as a non-Windows user, so just my outside observation.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          The main issue was that Vista asked for admin rights all the time. One of the first things they addressed with SP1 was to require admin privileges for fewer operations, cutting down on the number of UAC prompts.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve been using Windows 11 for some time. Besides it’s terrible AI features being shoved down our throats, what’s different about it from Win10?

      I don’t see too much of a difference between the two versions. The AI enshittification is relatively recent.

      • zzz711@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For me it’s the removal and change of UI elements. There is still no built in way to move the task bar to the top or side of the screen and to get a useful right click menu back I have to go into the registry and change a value. There is also the whole thing where you are forced to use a Microsoft account with no option to use a local account instead.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          I guess the location of the menu never really bothered me but I can understand that for folks who prefer it on the side.

          Admittedly, using a local account is a challenge though not impossible. But to your point none of these things should require registry hacks.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            Besides the ones that they listed, I’ve also heard complaints about a lack of multi-monitor support and ads in the Start menu and login screen, though I believe the ads are only in certain versions of 11 (the home/personal editions, but not the more expensive company editions). I think the ads have also been limited to Microsoft products and apps from the Microsoft store - stuff like Word and Edge - but it’s a really bad path that they’re going down and it’s only a matter of time until that becomes targeted ads to go along with their tracking and selling data.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s going to annoy me. I keep the task bar on the bottom on my machine and on the side for remote/virtual machines

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          This may not still be true, but previously if you disconnected or removed the NIC during installation, after some haranguing you could setup a local account. (Note that this is still obviously bad, but if you need a solution, it might provide one.)

          • notthebees@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            You actually have to exit the setup menu(f2 iirc), run a specific command, and then it will let you make an offline account.

            If you don’t have a NIC, it will make you get an internet connection before proceeding. That was my experience on my laptop. What had happened was that for whatever reason, my wifi card wouldn’t work with the amd motherboard in my laptop (it wasn’t cnvio, and it was the same issue with ac 7265 and an ax210). So I had to resort to that to install windows.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ah, fair enough.

              I haven’t used, or especially installed, Windows in years. Wasn’t sure if what I described was still the case. Good to know there’s still a way, though, in case I get desperate!

              • tux7350@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s really not that hard to use a local account. When it askes for a Microsoft account just hit SHIFT+F10 then type in the command “oobe\bypassnro” and the pc will reboot. Now just don’t let the computer connect to internet, and when it askes for internet hit “I don’t have an internet connection” and then it will let you continue with a local account.

                …I admit though… as I typed that out its pretty annoying lol Not hard, but like… just annoying.

                • toynbee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I was actually wondering, when the previous commenter referenced the setup menu, if the shift+F10 thing still worked. I know it brings up the command prompt in the install interface, but in case you didn’t know, it also brings up the command prompt in general use Windows. (Or it used to. Again, I’m very out of date on the subject.)

                  I think “not hard, just annoying” means that anything tech related is out of reach for most people, unfortunately. Plus, to be honest, most people probably won’t care about or see a problem with Microsoft forcing an online account on them. I’m happy they’re happy, but their privacy ends not with a bang, but a whimper.

        • JoshCodes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not defending windows 11 in any way, but on install, when you get to the “login to your microsoft account” screen, if you open command prompt (ctrl + f10 i think) and open the network utility - type ncpa.cpl, then you can find and disable your network adaptor. Close cmd and the network utility and click back. It will ask you to create a local user.

          I’ve done this a couple of times and it hasn’t forced me to create a Microsoft account yet (I use a lot of windows vms). If this no longer works on win11, apologies, it used to.

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s pretty much the main thing, through they keep trying to slip shit it like the recall function, ads in new places. They also had some real trouble with the new internal CPU management, not sure where that is these days.

        Honestly I’m tired of Microsoft pulling this shit. Personally I can take a bad OS launch or needing a little more maintaince on my PC, but I don’t want to fight them anymore for control of my own hardware.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Windows 11 is little more than a reskin of windows 10, and they still fucked it up.

        Rounded corners are mandatory (Why? I really preferred squared ones). But developers can choose to have their windows square. Why only the developers? Let the user decide how a windows looks like!

        And don’t get me started on the start menu. It was a complete massacre. Tiles are gone (am I the only one that liked them?). Instead, now we pin apps to the start menu. Fine I guess, except for the fact that half of the fucking menu is taken up by fucking recomendations. If I remove every single recommendation, instead of having my space back for more pinned programs I get this message: “oh you like this precious white space? If you turned on some recommendations it would show something”. No, i don’t want recommendations, I want my start menu space back. Which btw in windows 10 used to be resizable to whatever size I wanted.

        Oh and lets not forget about the volume mixer. Which some genius decided that it was better to keep it 10 clicks away from the user in the settings, instead of conveniently at one click in the taskbar. Which they also made the sound settings their own special taskbar element, instead of another taskbar program. So now if I want to replace their shitty sound settings with the ones I like (trumpet btw), now I would have 2 sound settings in the taskbar, while in win10 I only had 1.

        And whose Idea was to join the sound settings and internet settings in the same taskbar button visually? Which is also not the same button functionally. You see, if you press the left side of the button it opens the sound settings, but the right side opens the internet settings. How much do Microsoft UI people get paid?

        I guess we got dark notepad, that’s nice.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have to use it for software testing and I fucking hate the UI with everything crammed into the center of the taskbar. Beyond that it’s running in a virtual desktop and I don’t go beyond launching apps in it so I really can’t say. My work laptop is supposed to be upgraded next week, im sure ill find plenty to bitch about then.

        • Discover5164@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          you can change that. you can set the task bar to be similar to the previous versions.

          i have it with the windows button to the left, no search bar, no pinned apps no meteo.

          i prefer kde but it’s bearable.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The company I work for disabled the taskbar settings when they put out Win 10. I’m Assuming they will do it on Win11 too so I may not have that option but thanks for the info anyway I’ll certainly try it.

      • snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally I’ve had issues with it not being possible for the battery icon to showing a percentage. And the keyboard layout resets to the first one every time you unlock.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          keyboard layout resets

          Most people don’t care as they only have one layout. You and me are odd. I usually set my preferred layout as default

          • snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            My problem is that the laptop keyboard has an ISO layout but my preferred layout is ANSI. So i am sort of forced to switch when i occasionally have to use the laptop without an external keyboard. Also the international us layout on windows is bad because " and ’ are dead keys and there’s no way to fix it without installing a third party keyboard layout.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, their momentum is no joke. This may accelerate the shift towards Linux somewhat.

          Kind of the same story for the Fediverse.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m expecting that Steam on Linux is going to be what drives it.

          The Steam Deck can be used as a Linux computer and almost a turnkey way for a manufacturer to build a Steam computer without Windows.

      • andioop@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Have a Windows for gaming, going to switch to Linux once I can get a good deal on an external hard drive to back it up. Can confirm I’m making the switch because of the enshittification.

        • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m in the same situation but also use windows for Ableton and protocols. My steamdeck has really convinced me that Linux is ready for gaming tho

    • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah no, Windows 11 IS far worse than Windows 10

      Yeah no, Windows 10 IS far worse than Windows 8

      Yeah no, Windows 8 IS far worse than Windows 7

      Perpetual Windows $VERSION_THAT_I_GREW_UP_WITH isn’t bad. No, it’s just this new one that’s terrible.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, they’ve alternated between good and bad ever since 98.

        98 - good

        ME - bad

        XP - good

        Vista - bad

        7 - good

        8 - bad

        10 - good (eventually)

        11 - bad

          • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Windows ME was a crapshoot. One of our computers blue screened a few times during the couple months we had it installed; the other couldn’t even run an hour without hard crashing.

            Nowadays I can’t even remember the last time Windows crashed. Newer versions are definitely a lot more stable, though suck in different ways.

            • notthebees@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The one machine I had that ran Millennium Edition was a Sony laptop that came out right after it launched. Since it was the oem install, ig it survived for some time. My dad used it for Oracle DB work before I got it and used as a computer that could access the internet. I’ve only had one bsod with it. But realplayer deleted all my VXD files.

            • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              8 changed a lot of UI for no reason other than to chase the mobile market. 8.1 reverted a lot of that and people liked it, but the damage to 8’s reputation had already been done.

              If they kept the edition alive for a few years 8.1 might be remembered as a redemption story like Windows 98 Second Edition, but they rushed 10 out the door - as a free upgrade, no less - to get back the goodwill they’d lost.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I thought 10 was an improvement on 8, in part because they walked back some changes to 8.

        I have yet to hear of a reason to go to 11.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I grew up with XP, vista was worse and windows 7 was ust better. Windows 8 was terrible. Windows 10 better than 8 but worse than 7.

        I haven’t even try windows 11.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t remember anyone saying 10 was worse than 8. Maybe buggier on launch, but stylistically it worked more like 7 than 8 did

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s certainly better than Windows 8 and it’s awful mandatory touch interface.

    • gimmemahlulz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      አማርኛ
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Windows 11 is ok, just like windows 10 was ok. It’s not great, but it’s not satan’s asshole like some people make it out to be. Most use it because they don’t really have a choice due to software constraints, or simply because they’ve been using windows for forever and that’s all they know.

      Personally I use linux because I like it more, though I still have a windows install for flightsimming. I think that it’s a perfectly fine operating system for the 80-90% of people who don’t care and just want their computer to be an appliance to get on social media or get work done.

      • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s fair, I just like windows and that’s really all there is to it. I’ve had a few Linux installs in the past, but never really found an advantage to anything except compiling this one specific python library, but these days I can do that very easily running WSL, VS code SSH’d to my server or more recently a jupyter server that I can connect to from any device with a web browser.

        Now macOS on the other hand, I absolutely despise. It was one of the first OS’s I learnt to use back in primary school, and now that I have to use it for work I have absolutely no nice things to say. Unintuitive, missing basic features and slow to navigate, and I can assure you that none of this is due to unfamiliarity…

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to uninstall OneDrive & Teams from my work computer thanks to a Windows update reinstalling them. My IT director is getting frustrated by it too because he has to keep updating GP and other tools to prevent them from showing up and users inadvertently putting shit into the MS Cloud accidentally because OneDrive likes to insert itself the default documents folder.

      I also prefer my start bar to be on the left hand side of my left-most monitor in vertical orientation (I run a tri-montior setup in a tie fighter configuration).

      As already stated, the new right-click menu is also ass, and I keep having to fix it to get the actual fucking options I want/need without having to click a button to “show more options” from a menu that loads noticeably slower, or shift-right-click to get the intended menu.

      There’s a ton of other little annoyances, like removing or relocating configuration flows with inferior tools that don’t support everything that used to be configurable. AI search in my start bar (so glad for PowerToys Run).

      Windows 11 has done a great job at removing user control over their OS by forcing changes (often inferior to the old version/way) and forcing optional software installs (just wait til Recall is sitting on everybody’s machine).

      Things that are nice: A better networking stack, blue tooth management, and a powerful built-in windows layout manager (Snap Layouts)

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s a boiling frog/straw on the camel’s back situation.

      I’ve heard people say both that Microsoft releases a good version of Windows every third time, and that the way Windows works is that Microsoft releases the new one, it’s slightly worse/different from the previous and everybody hates it, then they get used to it by the time Microsoft releases the next version, starting the cycle of outrage all over again.

      To me, it seems that the average user experience changes a little between different Windows versions, oftentimes making the experience a little more clumsy (have they finished migrating everything from the Control Panel to whatever the new settings panel is called yet? They started that back in like Windows 7), and the “power users” are the ones who get shafted worse.

      For me, 10 will most likely be the last version of Windows that I use. I’ve reached a point in my life where I will happily stop using services/doing business with companies based on some of the stuff Microsoft is doing, like the ad integration, AI nonsense, forced Microsoft account and data harvesting, and the awful security threat that Recall was (and probably will be again when they repackage it and try it again). I’d honestly still be using 7 if it was still supported because I liked it much more than I do 10.

  • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    the middle 2 frames of the xkcd comic

    The embed on my client only gave me the middle 2 panels for context and honestly still funny

  • Tug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I do not Linux. Actually, I don’t even computer. I do everything on my phone. The Vista machine is something offline to store photos and some docs.

    • Faresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      The hover-over text says “Disclaimer: I have not actually tried the beta yet. I hear it’s quite pleasant and hardly Hitler-y at all.”