Formerly u/CanadaPlus101 on Reddit.
The thing is, negotiation is always easier than implementation, which is why it comes before.
It’s pretty clear at this point we’re going to stop climate change right around as fast as technology forces us to. I don’t see any other plausible path.
Second person never has a gender in English. Saying “you” should also be fine, or “thee” if you feel like getting your quaker on.
Special requests notwithstanding - the platinum rule here is just to accommodate whatever you reasonably can.
The Mona Lisa is in the public domain, so no, that’s not really a good analogy for a recently published book.
So basically, they can try to stop you, but you’re allowed to win.
Well, sometimes it happens. Lemmy was semi-broken during the APIocalypse, and there still isn’t such a thing as a FOSS Facebook, or search engine backend for that matter.
And Linux/BSD are so good proprietary developers rip them off to whatever degree legally permissible.
Sort of? I think this was more of a “see, Americans agree, women are shit”.
True, your policies don’t have to make sense if you win.
That being said, this guy runs a fringe party. They have a whole 3 seats in the Diet’s lower house and none whatsoever in the upper.
It’s the same in Australia. Something about the pacific must make parties switch places.
Pfft, he’s doing an amateur job of intimidating, then. It should have been thumbscrews or something. This way seems self defeating.
Yeah, I’m actually hella curious what the context was here. Why would he want any of that?
At least on the official web app, that doesn’t render as a link. You’ve got to do it as [whatever](u/[email protected])
Literally just put it in that way, for future notice - there’s no hidden formatting here.
Question: what do you mean illegal in Canada? AFAIK the only extra laws here are already covered by rule 4.
Mmm yes, big ass rotors to keep that solid gold/uranium/whatever frame off the seabed.
Hopefully somebody else $DAYJOBs at GitHub and will see this.
Uhh, so looking carefully at the picture, it appears they shouldn’t have bothered with the inner pathway at all, and should have just connected the bridge over the canal (?) in the background to whatever is under the camera.
Not only does the current design fail to provide a short path in demand, it leaves a goofy little boulevard behind the benches in what appears to be a dense, desirable urban area where you shouldn’t waste space.
Just give the URL, I’ll do a federated link for you.
Sabre rattling, or legit threat?
Their negotiation position within NATO isn’t absolute, so I think the most likely response is the EU agreeing to look at it and that Trump is smart and handsome, and then mostly doing whatever they were going to do anyway.
I’m talking about solar, EVs and so on. It’s straight-up cheaper to not use fossil fuels now, for most things, and the remaining ones seem like they’re inevitably coming.
Don’t worry, I’m still pretty doomer about it. The planet’s going to get a bit messed up in the meanwhile, and we’d have just kind of boiled ourselves like a frog, if we hadn’t gotten lucky with cheap renewables suddenly appearing.