• _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    That’s a perfect way to put it. I remember starting college and being really excited about the cloud, having my stuff accessible anywhere, changes automatically saved, etc etc. but now I don’t want any of my shit anywhere near their servers, it’s mine and mine alone and I’ll manage it myself and buffer against losses the best I can. I’d rather have myself fuck up and break a hard drive rather than let microsoft or apple wipe my stuff over a bug or because I didn’t pay them enough. Horrible, misleading bullshit.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Indeed, Linux and FLOSS more broadly was never about technology itself, it’s about empowering. It “just” happens to be where software change could lead to a pragmatic difference for so many lives.

    Own your computer, own your devices, value your life and don’t interact with the numerical world through manipulative blinders.

  • 4vgj0e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I helped my parents migrate to linux mint and they are very happy with the transition. No more ads, dumb bing search suggestions, or MS edge.

    • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      My parents have been asking me to do this for multiple years at this point, I need to make sure I do it next time I visit (they’re on win 10 though so it could be worse at least)

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Windows 9x was low-bullshit.

      NT and 2000 were corporate enough to be no-nonsense. They belonged to the administrator, but the administrator can be you.

      ME was a mistake.

      XP was not yet online enough to be properly skeezy.

      But from Vista onward, yeah, it’s been an escalating shit-show that’s difficult to miss.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    This dude is begging for an ad free windows at the end. Why? They’re too far gone. Go make a new home in another OS. It will be okay.

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Honestly, it wouldn’t have been a bad place to be if they hadn’t destroyed it from the inside. Windows on ARM is super stable. You can still build your own computer, or at least buy one with user-swappable parts. Linux has become much easier and wasn’t too bad to use even a decade ago, but it was nice being able to have a non-Apple computer running programs and getting work done that was just there to do the business. I’m speaking as one that attempted to use the kool-aid for a few years after Apple stopped using user-swappable batteries, memory, disk, their hardware upcharges are pure asshole insanity. I’m fully capable of using Linux, compiling my kernel, modifying driver source to work around problems, but, I don’t want to when I’m just trying to pay my bills. Streaming media services come and go with Linux support, hardware support is often lacking until the work is done to make the hardware work correctly. Windows, for all it’s … windowsness … worked. Until the last 8 months when they decided to put a molotov cocktail under the hood and see what happens.

        Apple is headed this way too, now that they don’t have SJ to errantly blow up the current tech to try something new and random (although, had he survived his cancer, he’d have just gone Musky with age like a lot of that generation has, mmmm leaded gas!) Apple will hold on just a bit longer because iOS gave them one new platform reboot (ish) to live off of, while Microsoft is still kicking around technical debt until the end of time.

        Oh, edit though, I’ve been migrating my machines to Linux one by one now. Not going to bother sticking around to see that Windows train wreck continue.

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        The only difficult part would be to install Linux. It would be more difficult the other way around, so it’s not like this part is a case of “Linux is difficult”.

        You most just need the following:

        • Get a hold of a small USB storage device you can erase the contents of
        • Download an image of the Linux distro of your choice.
        • Burn that image onto the storage medium
        • Figure out how to enter into your bios, when the computer starts up.
        • Change the boot order so that your installer gets preference
        • Try out the Linux distro (you don’t need to do anything, or install it if you like it.
      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        If you can use windows, then you can use Linux. The effort of switching is not really any different than the effort of switching to Mac.

      • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Your not too dumb to learn linux. I know it seems scary, and a lot of the autistic people that like it will try to convince you it’s only for really smart people. But at the end of the day a lot of basic tasks are actually easier on linux. There are some that are harder gaming used to be very difficult for example. Although thanks to valve, and the steam deck for the most part if it’s a steam game you can just click play and it’s probably going to work.

        But as an example of a more basic thing, let’s say you want to install an application.

        Windows: go to Google, type app name, make sure it’s the real actual website officially for that app and not a sponsored result or some other fake website, find the download, pray it’s not buried in a bunch of fake download buttons, double click the exe, be careful to make sure it’s not installing any toolbars or other packaged bullshit, finally get your application.

        Linux: there are some variations (apt dnf pacman) but all of them work the same, for arch it’s “pacman -Syu <name of app>” id argue thats WAY easier. If it’s not in the main repos chances are high it’s in the AUR (arch user repository) so you just yay -Syu <name of app>. It’s not harder (imo) just different.

        I’ve actually had a number of pretty average computer user friends let me help them transition to Linux because of the crap Windows is doing lately. And after getting used to the differences they agree that Linux is not actually harder, it’s just different, they grew up with windows, they are used to how things are done on windows, so it seemed difficult just because it wasn’t the same. But once they got used to it they would actually agree that a lot of things are actually easier.

        Now whether or not you want to put in that time to learn those differences, and change how you use your computer, is an entirely different question that you have to ask yourself. But you are not too stupid to learn Linux because realistically it’s not any more difficult than Windows is

        • fluckx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          They dont need to know any commands.

          Everything in Linux is point and click. There’s an app store where you’ll find everything you’ll need. You will not need to open the terminal at all. All drivers will get installed through the OS.

          Only things which do not work are the keyboard software and stuff to map macros to your keys and/or mouse buttons ans tweak the colours. Like the Razor software.

          Distros like Ubuntu, popos, Linux mint are incredibly beginner friendly. There are, without a doubt, others.

          They didn’t need to know any cmd/powershell commands using windows and they definitely don’t need to know how to use a Linux terminal to browse/mail/install software on Linux.

          • 01011@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Depends on the distro but you are largely right. You can easily use Linux Mint or Ubuntu without being familiar with the cli.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Most beginner friendly Linux distros have installers. You just need Rufus and a guide to making a bootable USB (its like 5 steps)

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        You are not too dumb to learn Linux. If I learned how to use it then you can. Start with with something simple and easy to install such as Linux Mint or Ubuntu and you will inevitably learn more as you go on. If you can read, point and click and observe then you have all the skills required to install the aforementioned distros.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You don’t have to learn how all bits and pieces of the system work. You just have to learn how to use it.

          You probably don’t know how all of windows works and that doesn’t bother your daily routine.

    • style99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      For me, it’s been the year of Linux since 2005. I do dual boot, though.

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Buying windows is like self flagellation. You have to be a masochist to enjoy it,especially the apologetic users.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Unfortunately for many, even in this day and age, there is not much choice. I main linux but also keep Windows on my PC as there are still tines when something will only work in Windows. Usually work related or gaming (VR in particular for me) and in fairness its increasingly rare.

      Many other users aren’t motivated to change. For Microsoft, its a bit like boiling a frog - if you turn up the heat slowly the frog just puts up with it. That’s what Microsoft is doing to its customers - a slow constant enshittification, seeing what it can get away with. Try something and it causes outrage? Don’t worry, just undo it and just try again in a few years! Many are already used to no privacy and being sold as a commodity that they don’t even question it happening on their own personal computer.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You don’t need Windows for gaming.

        Sure, some games only work on Windows but some only work on Switch or PS5 and you can still play video games without playing those in particular.

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I disagree.

      • XP felt like it was mine.
      • 7 felt like it was mine
      • 8 felt like they were trying to force something on me.
      • 10 felt like they were pushing bloatware like a cell phone. At least l could remove some of that?
      • 11 feels like they decided it’s their computer, I’m just renting time in it by watching ads. You could remove half the programs by default and I would not miss any of them. Do I need a version of minesweeper with micro transactions? No!
      • MisterD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        XP wasn’t yours when MS pushed an update without permission or announcement.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Which is weird, since Win2k definitely had lower hardware compatibility than XP, Vista, 7, etc.

          It wasn’t consumer-focused and just didn’t have the driver compatibility from vendors yet.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Quite the contrary, it had exemplary compatibility, including Plug’n’Play and wide native USB support.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              With the things you tried it did.

              Believe me, I was part of a team testing compatibility.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I imagine, you guys might be measuring with two different scales. Early Windows versions were fine, but even back then, a switch to Linux would give you so much more customizability to actually make it yours.

        This is a dumb anecdote, but I switched to Linux from Windows 8, and pretty much the first thing I did, was to figure out how to hide the window titlebars. Mostly because I realized, I could, but they also just took screen space away on my laptop.

      • Aa!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago
        • 7 felt like it was mine

        I remember that marketing campaign. Windows Vista had a shaky launch, because the hardware manufacturers hadn’t polished the Vista-compatible drivers yet. 6 months later, they had caught up, but people still had a bad taste from it.

        So when service pack 1 came out, Microsoft made a reskinned version of it and started an ad campaign with “customers” claiming “Windows 7 was my idea!” and the public ate it up.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          As I remember Vista had some areas that were hard or unintuitive to configure, Win7 cleaned up those parts.

          Win7 also made the disk hungry background processes play nice, Vista would occasionally lock up with 100% CPU and disk usage while the os scanned something.

          And I agree Win7 is just a reskinned Vista.

          • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I remember my vista experience was excessive amounts of prompts to confirm it was using some privileged access for literally anything I tried to do.

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Are there different versions of Windows 11? Mine doesn’t show ads at all.

      • perishthethought@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m curious about this. Do either of you run a custom dns for blocking ads, like adguard or pihole?

        Did you turn off a bunch of stuff when you first got the PC?

        Do you have corporate policies being applied in your registry?

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I have Win 11 Pro. I had Starfield ads on my lock screen for a while. I also had those search recommendations, but that’s it. Now I have nothing. Maybe it’s related to EU?

  • Lightfire228@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    There’s a reason I run Linux, and root my Android

    Because it actually feels like my device now

    (And fixing issues is significantly easier, if you know where to look)