True nathematician would never make a mistake distinguishing finite and infinite cardinality. Countability, on the other hand… (but that’s a separate issue)

Easy, view it on a curved display. Now every line is curved

If only haskell devs were writing documentations, instead of going “type sigs is all the documentation you need!”

I see. Maybe learning mathematics have screwed my writing since so much of mathematical literature is simply equations, definitions and propositions. Lots of papers, and even books, are just bad at expositions, in my experience.

It takes hours to write essays for me…

There is no good programming language, even including the ones people do not use.

I wish I were you, I struggle so much with reading books and papers

They do have antiderivatives, you just cannot elementarily compute them. Non-exact differential forms, however…

Seems like one can maybe work with complex metric. Interesting idea

I am sorry, but… to be pedantic, pythagorean theorem works on real-valued length. Complex numbers can be scalars, but one does not use it for length for some reason I forgor.

Thanks a lot, will try!!

How well does it work? On my iPad, Safari Adguard can only black out ad content. (Screen is black during ad, and it displays how many seconds of ad is left)

deleted by creator

Not really if he also have mild autism

At least you are not actually inferior to others. That’s for me, I am ultimately inferior for real.

This man can achieve device compatibility in free time, yet I cannot even do any kind of work properly…

It does not let me like the work I mildly dislike, right?

I thought this was taught in high school. Curriculums differ drastically between countries, don’t they?

The haskell examples look more like an arcane wizardry.

Interesting, this was exactly my mindset on voting at age 10 or so. Guess some people never gets out of that phase?