I’m talking about like tax fraud and stuff.
Do you be the snitch, or do you be like Skyler White and join them?
I feel like this is the kind of question that needs a whole lot of details before it is answerable.
Tax fraud? Absolutely fuck not.
Drunk driving? Probably I would give them a single “Hey next time I find out you’re doing that I am calling the cops on you” warning shot.
Stealing from their company? Depends, what does the company do and who owns it? Again almost certainly not.
And so on.
No wonder nepotism exists
Personally I make a distinction in tax fraud. If it’s an individual? Meh, whatever. If it’s a company that has a significantly larger impact.
If it harmed an innocent, probably. If it harmed a government, corporation, or detestable person, no.
Rarely is it only one or the other and not both or even several together, though…
It’s a case by case judgment call.
There’s two extremes and the gradient between as I see it. One end of the scale follows their own code primarily and only respects laws they disagree with out of fear of social contract violations and the punishments. The other group follows and enforces all law without much critical thought about who is writing them and why. Unjust or not they don’t seem to care. Then your middle grounders.
Partners and I have always been pretty strongly on the “our own code is primary” side. Probably because I wouldn’t find someone with the other mindset attractive.
So, it really depends on what they did exactly. If I agree with them, I’m not saying shit. Although if I’m upset or not depends if we talked about it or not. If I’m just getting surprised by this, the sneaky secrecy behind my back would risk the relationship more than anything likely.
Tax fraud I wouldn’t be okay with, so if they went and did it anyways or didn’t talk to me about it beforehand that’s game over.
As long as nobody is hurt beyond the pockets, I don’t know shit about fuck.
You don’t have join them, but you can also not see a god damned thing. Unless they’re doing something that screws over good, innocent people, especially on a wide scale, I’m minding my own business.
What offense?
Ya, hopefully OP is in a safe place if need be.
exactly
I ain’t seen nuttin’, officer.
What’s the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?
This is democracy manifest!
Ah I see you know your judo well!
Get your hand off my peNIS!
And you sir, are you waiting to receive my limp penis?
Depends on the details. If their crime hurt someone innocent (or had a high likelihood to) and it was intentional, yes.
If I’m likely to go down with them if they get caught, yes.
Otherwise, I ain’t no snitch and even if I were I don’t know anything about nothing.
Yeah, I would’ve done so too, because that dude was bankrupting people just to make himself a bit richer. I hope he rots in hell.
See, there’s people here saying never for something nonviolent. That’s kinda silly, non-violent crimes can be just as bad. They’re just less visually compelling.
I have higher standards than most people I guess. My rule is simple: don’t be stupid, don’t be a dick. If you can’t clear those two pretty low bars then you are cordially invited to get bent.
Honestly, if it’s truly a “loved one” I probably wouldn’t even report them for murder. Why? I think that when someone is close enough to you we simply apply different standards to them. Kind of like rescuing your own child from a burning building rather that rescuing two strangers.
I detest people that make serious holes in their morals for close ones. It’s repulsive.
There’s a big difference between committing a crime and reporting someone for a crime they’ve already committed. To me, it’s pretty clear why murder is wrong - but the virtue of reporting a loved one for murder isn’t nearly as obvious.
Report them for tax fraud? Almost definitely not. I would be getting a lawyer and accountant to insulate myself and my financials from them.
Snitches get stitches. If they aren’t hurting anyone let em be exercise ur right to silence if questioned.
If they get in shit tho don’t bail em out its not ur problem.
This is nepotism plain and simple.
Everyone looks at trump employing his friends and family and complains, but put in the same place you’d all do the same.
Well that’s a left-field response. He’s not just employing friends and family, he’s also employing loyalists who’ve garnered favors from him (because of their loyalty). And it isn’t just a business, it’s a government
I would employ my family if I could, but I sure as hell wouldn’t choose them over qualified professionals, whether it’s a business or a government. I’m sure as shit not gonna have someone with no financial expertise running my accounting, no matter how much I love them.
Don’t make everything political and start stirring shit, we have enough of that right now
Lol. Do you know the word hypocrisy?
Tax fraud costs everyone. https://www.statista.com/chart/8668/the-global-cost-of-tax-avoidance/
What are you on about? Anything but OP’s question I guess, just going on tangents instead?
The article you linked is about corporate tax avoidance btw, which yes, absolutely effects everyone. Anything else you’d like to add to your ramblings?
You are correct that it’s corporate tax fraud in the link I provided. Here’s something about the cost of individual tax fraud.
Please, take your pick.
https://www.efile.com/tax-evaders-tax-cheaters-tax-evasion/
OP:
I’m talking about like tax fraud and stuff.
If it’s non-violent, no. never.
As a general rule, I don’t call the cops on anyone unless that person’s death will prevent immediate harm to others.
Cause if you call the cops on someone, you do put that person (and their neighbors) in mortal danger.
What about taking the direct (early) Breaking Bad example: they’re not gunning people down in the street, but their product is definitely getting poeple, including children, addicted. It’s non-violent, let’s say they don’t even hire people to shoot competitors or whatever, but it is inarguably causing people significant, probably life-long harm.
Wow, where do you live? This just sounds crazy to have to worry about this when deciding whether to involve the cops.
Going to guess America, since all of those rules apply for dealing with U.S. police. If you call them, you have to expect someone to die.
“Expect” seems a bit dramatic, since it’s not like they gun down someone on every call. Be prepared for the possibility, maybe.
It goes like this. If you have a problem and you call the cops, you now have two problems. It’s up to you to decide if the first problem is worth getting into the second.
Snitch on a loved one? Never. If I thought it was ethically or morally wrong, I would tell them what I think about it. Good people also make mistakes, and good people can change.
What if your family member deliberately molested a young child, would you not want to get that child help? Even if you refused to tell the police, you would need to tell someone related to that child and 99/100 cases would result in them reporting the abuse to police.
How is that a non-violent offence?
I would not.
Even if the law made it my duty to do so, I would not comply (aka the law can go fuck itself). It’s family. Family is at the base of everything else, including civil society (with all its laws, and all its crimes). There is no way I will report any member of the family, for anything.
It doesn’t mean I blindly agree with anything stupid my family could do (certainly not) nor that whatever ‘bad’ they may do shouldn’t be dealt with. It just means that it’s not (civil) society’s business.
