• somtwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “of the feminine species”

    Uh, do you want to explain to this guy what a species is, or do I have to?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ladies wasn’t used in the Original Post.


        When playing a RPG of some sort, sometimes they give you the ability to reallocate all your talent points in a different way. Such as switching from melee focused to something magic oriented like a wizard or a witch. This is called a Respec, short for Re-specialization.


        Respec sounds very similar to Respect. The Original Post is about respecting women.

        I appreciate your interest in my comment, hope you have a nice day. Take care.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a man who likes fedoras, this stereotype offends me. Sadly, it’s an accurate description most of th etime.

      • kadup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Usually the Redditors wear the fedora without knowing how to pair it correctly with the rest of their outfits, so don’t worry, if you wear a nice attire and a fedora people won’t get you confused with the guy wearing an ahegao t-shirt two sizes too small and cargo shorts.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      And I can hear it spoken with a lisp that you get when talking with a mouth full of prosthetics. Pfemales

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Is female derogatory? I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

      Edit: I work at a large engineering and manufacturing company where some of our products need to take into consideration the difference between male and female anatomy. I just hear “male” and “female” systems discussed on a weekly basis so I think I might sometimes refer to men and women as “male” and “female” outside of work without giving it a second thought.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

        Scientifc classification by sex. Referring to others by their biological sex in a social context is weird and creepy. Even if you believe sex and gender are the same thing, it’s still weird to call people by their sex. “Hello, male human. Want to ingest some fried pieces of cow flesh tonight?”

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you are calling a woman “a female”, and aren’t a cop discussing a victim or a doctor writing a chart, then yes, it’s fucking derogatory.

        We’re not Ferengi.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yep. A lot of incels seemingly are unfamiliar with scientific classification and try to use it in casual statements.

          Like, they sound real stupid trying to redirect it to be about science then saying phrases like “boobs and tits”.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Using scientific terminology in colloquial speech is weird and creepy in most contexts. Calling kids “juveniles” and women “females” carries certain connotations, most of them bad.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Using female as a noun (rather than as an adjective, such as in the phrase “female firefighter”, or any phrase of the format “female $noun”) is generally overly clinical and dehumanizing. Some people do it out of habit due to their profession-- usually researchers or soldiers-- but they usually say “males and females”, which while still weird isn’t the worst.

        The guys who say “men and females” are the ones you need to watch out for.

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not inherently derogatory, but it does hold a connotation if you refer to women as females particularly in contexts where you wouldn’t/don’t refer to men as males.

      • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, using scientific terminology can be derogatory. But in this case, acting like the opposite sex is a species on its own, classifying them as animals and slurring all women as hoes gave it away for me.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

        It’s a classification of sex like biological characteristics, like chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive organs.  Are you asking about that?

        Gender is a social construct. Just like race. Where you can be a Black person who is British. Or a Filipino American.

        Edit: downvoters, you know you can literally open up a scientific book and verify for yourself, right? Downvotes don’t make a thing false.

  • Redredme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    4 days ago

    No, they want to be called LA class nuclear powered attack submarine.

    We’re in shit posting after all.

    Happy Xmas, ya filthy animal!

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s everyone’s language, everyone can bully each other over it. The Brits added u to a bunch of words just to fuck with us…and then misspelled tire. Just last week heard an upper class indian with more British roots give a more Americanized indian man shit for spelling it tire rather than tyre, with zero knowledge of the history.

      On the whole I think English speakers are relatively polite about misunderstood words in person, even relatively racist asshats. But when you can’t read the accent, you default to your own culture and in that culture it’s pronounced to rhyme with tamales.

      • My brother in christ, the british spelling is the original.

        The reason you spell it differently was a conscious decision of your revolutionaries to differentiate themselves from the brits

        You used the same spelling before your independence.

        And how about “noone can bully” instead of “everyone can bully”?

        Just throwing tht in the room here.

        I won’t bully you for writing “recognise” just to assert your independence, you let us be us and everyone is happy, is tht a Deal?

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No, it’s not, go learn history. Its a mix and match on both sides usually because spelling wasn’t standard anyway. Webster picked ones he liked, mostly to feel superior to Brits, Brits picked the opposite to feel superior to americans. We have the legacy accent, uk has the posh accent to sound different. We did simplify some words, Brits complexified others to be more posh.

          • The british spelling comes from the conquest of the duke of normandy and was already being standardized before your independence.

            This is again such a us-centric way of thinking.

            “We are so important the british chnged their entire language just to spite us”

            I really don’t want to be rude when I say this, but I can’t find any better qords: please get out of your bubble. This US-centrism really annoys others.

            And don’t tell people to “go learn history”. It’s just bloody rude, even if you would have been right.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    In most contexts, you’d just say…”people”.

    Or, if you’re actually trying to make a demographic-wide statement, like how women aren’t good at video games, you’d just say:

    “IGNORE ME, I AN A SEXIST MORON.”

    Basically, the meme isn’t much meant for the word choice, it’s how often incels have statements to make on half the population.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    You remember how everyone just used to say women 10-20 years ago? I guess that’s woke now. So much for conserving.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The multiple of “trans woman” is “trans women” just like with “cis women”, not “trans-woman”.

            There’s also no dash in either “cis women” or “trans women”, it’s not half-cis half-woman like Spider-Man, it’s just a descriptor adjective, like “cis woman” and “trans woman”.

            “Cis” and “Trans” of course come from the Latin prefixes meaning “this side of” or “other side of” such as in Cislunar Orbit or Translunar Injection (TLI) in astrodynamics, or the Cisalpine/Transalpine Gaul in historical geography or in Cis/Trans isomerism in Chemistry.

            “Transmaxxing” is primarily used by incels that believe transition can be a way out of their inceldom, similar to gym-‘maxxing’ etc., while I’ve never heard of anyone actually transitioning for such silly reasons as it’s a helluva thing to do, I doubt that this would work out in their favour.

            Additionally while many cis women do hate trans women, statistically speaking they are less likely to be against trans rights than men, especially on issues like trans women using the women’s bathroom or gyms or other issues that upset some cis people like healthcare access for trans children via either hormones or puberty blockers.

            Source from surveys carried out on TERF Island in 2020 and 2022:

            https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/43194-where-does-british-public-stand-transgender-rights-1

            https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/30906-where-does-british-public-stand-transgender-rights

            Let me know if you need further help.

            • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              No no no, It was coined by Cis White women to trash Trans-Women, PERIOD Stop scapegoating incels for everything & stop being a sex-obsessed creep (who wants to peek at other’s sex-life) as well, get some therapy

              • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Well you brought up up the matter, not me, I don’t have any interest in sex lives of incels or anyone else really, I don’t think it’s wrong to discuss such subjects on the internet though, there’s really nothing to be ashamed of, I didn’t lose my virginity till 20. It’s really all okay.

          • nixcamic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Really? Most of my friends and family are super conservative and even though they disagree with the whole concept of transsexuality none of them hate trans women. Maybe you’re protecting your bigotry.