edited from talent to job

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      CEO is usually my answer as well when people ask

      Like, honestly too. The humans running the show are outrageously expensive, cause huge ecological harm, make their decisions based on vibes with no understanding of their domain, and their purposes are inscrutable to the average worker. They’re honestly the perfect target for AI because they already behave like AI.

      I don’t think I actually want to live in a world where AI is running the show, but I’m not sure it’d be any worse than the current system of letting the most parasitic bloodsucking class of human being call the shots. Maybe we ought to try something else first.

      But make sure to tell the board of directors and shareholders how much more profitable they’d be if they didn’t have to buy golden parachutes

      • Norin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d say that you could replace quite a few high level academic administrators for these same reasons.

        They already behave like AI; but AI would be cheaper, more efficient, and wouldn’t change every 2 years.

        And I mean that as an insult to admin, not a compliment to AI.

  • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Perhaps it’s not possible to fully replace all humans in the process, but harmful content filtering seems like something where taking the burden off humans could do more good than harm if implemented correctly (big caveat, I know.)

    Here’s an article detailing a few peoples’ experience with the job and just how traumatic it was for them to be exposed to graphic and distributing content on Facebook requiring moderator intervention.

    • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I get what you’re going for but I have a hard time imagining this as a good thing so long as companies are profit driven.

    • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeh I think people like this idea because of a kind of ironic poetic justice since it’s those guys who wanted to replace everyone else except themselves with AI, but if you think about how much you hated those uncaring bastards operating like robots just to extract an ounce of profit at whatever the human cost, imagine now actually being a robot. Also, if you ever had to deal with bullshit from those guys and resented having to grin and bear it even though you don’t think they’re particularly qualified and also know nothing about your job, imagine having to be “managed” by a fucking robot that tries to say patronising encouraging things because it’s learned the very best pattern of speech to get the behaviour it wants out of you. Admittedly at least some of the decision making might be a bit more rational, but then every now and then AI gets things totally out of wack in the strangest ways and you’ll have to just take those decisions, from a damn machine.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anti-Cheats. Train an AI on gameplay data (position, actions, round duration, K/D, etc.) of caught cheaters and usw that to flag new ones. No more Kernel level garbage, just raw gameplay data.

    • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s also good since it’s low stakes. I mean I’d be furious if misidentified after I paid to use the game and but at the end of the day it’s only a game.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any body-breaking heavy labour. Emphasis on body-breaking; there’s nothing wrong with hard work, but there are certain people that believe hard work = leaving your body destroyed at 50.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My greatest fear is we’ll get the robots (like, Animatrix: Second Renaissance of I, Robot general purpose robots) but before we have any sort of progressive change of revolution. That we’ll be one step from a truly carefree life.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    None. Maybe some middle management, but even then, until AI fixes the hallucinations for good, in useless

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve met a few human middle managers who regularly hallucinated, when humans do it we call it “lying” though.