-
Wants to continue democracy and peaceful transfer of power
-
Consistently demonstrates adequate mental health
-
Respects religious diversity
-
Has stable and data-driven policy stances
Has stable and data-driven policy stances
Does she? What policy stances does she have and what data does she have to back them up?
I agree with the rest though, and honestly the first was pretty much the only reason I voted for Biden last time.
Oh my god! Literally the end of Western civilization!
The fact that this is even a contest makes me fucking weep for humanity.
Has stable and data-driven policy stances
What’s kind of strange is this one. It sounds good, but aren’t those what we call “technocrats?” I don’t know enough to say whether I think it’s good or bad, but I know people talk about that as if it is bad.
Isn’t 80
-
Now I want to vote for her even harder.
Seriously, is this supposed to be deterring people? Who looks at any of those and thinks they’re a bad thing, except for oil executives, corporate investors, landlords and the ultra-rich?
Don’t forget the temporarily embarrassed millionaires.
How could we when they won’t stop their incessant shrieking about literally anything they find remotely inconvenient or vaguely threatening due the simple fact that liberals/progressive advocate for it?
Zombies?
Remember that time when Fox News popped up a list of AOC’s goals, then realized that their viewers might actually be in favor of them and took it down.
Harris is here kicking the door WIDE open for AOC.
Stupid people?
tax-funded Medicare-for-all
Is there another way to do it, or do they just want to add a scary word?
All healthcare providers spontaneously switch to being free? Otherwise, yeah, it’s gonna be taxes I think
Comservatives hate taxes. They complain that the left is entitled and then bitch and moan when they have to actually pay their share for the services they use. Nothing will get them more fired up than hating on taxes even if you show them just how vile and expensive the private version is.
“I earned that money(all by myself and at no point did I use any tax-funded infrastructure no not me not never).”
A libertarian “sovereign citizen” is absolutely peak conservative entitlement. “I should have all the benefits of society while putting nothing that I don’t feel like back in.”
“Sovereign citizens” aren’t libertarian, they’re just delusional. Everybody makes fun of those yokels, especially us libertarians…
Don’t tell them about school vouchers. They’ll never understand how that is funded.
But that’s another way to funnel public funds into private coffers. They’re all about that. Like private prisons! Maybe there should be a prison voucher system now that I think about it. Ugg
Or single family homes. That policy from Project 2025 will increase local taxes and other municipal services fees. It’s just not at the federal level.
Surprised they didn’t just put “SOCIALIST HEALTHCARE ADVOCATE”
They never say Tax Funded private health care with horrifying outcomes.
Single payer Medicare for all I think has been an idea considered to get us incrementally closer to a publicly funded option for all like federal employees like senators and reps currently have. If it’s good enough for those citizens it should be good enough for all citizens, but getting there has been awful because oligarchs won’t fund a campaign based on real public healthcare reform and political parties dump candidates who don’t get money.
Stop, I can only get so erect
And these things are bad why?
Looks like they support her now
Vance is also anti-choice, including for women and children who have been raped.
Abortion is really the Republicans’ Achilles heel. Harris needs to hammer them on that.
Good point, that’s a good focus for her.
She hasn’t been a great public speaker so far as VP, but I don’t know how different she’ll be as a presidential candidate, I’m looking forward to it.
Looks like she still has that pained speaking look in Delaware likeshe’s barely getting the words out, but idk, first stop or something on the trail, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKvJJR-6jO4
I like the words she’s saying, but I’m not exactly pumped up by her seeking lack of conviction.
I’ll keep listening.
For her speech in Milwaukee, I think she blew it out of the water. She got the crowd hyped.
Thank you!
You are right, that was a much better showing with much more enthusiasm and much more convincing appeal to progressives.
I look forward to hearing more.
I thought she looked like she was throwing up in her mouth in Delaware, but this really was a good speech.
I think it’s all those years lawyering. She’s spent more time arguing cases in front of juries and judges than political speeches and it kinda shows.
Yea, I think you’re right. It’ll be interesting to see how she develops being in such a different role.
What I saw sounds so canned that I can’t take anything she’s saying seriously, but I’ve yet to watch the Milwaukee speech someone just recommended
Covid should have been the pants on fire moment for M4A, but still no discussion.
So… Those are supposed to be bad things?
Newsmax viewers can’t read anyway.
I especially enjoy that investigating companies is seen as an obvious and unforgivable indictment. They’re not even going to argue it was baseless or anything. Just that she had the audacity to challenge companies.
These aren’t bugs, they are, literally, features.
Woah.
(Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based! Based!)
where do i sign up?
At your local polling place!
