Your other option is a equally old man, hopped up on Sudafed, who lost his hospital privileges just 4 years ago because his mortality rate was insanely high, and no one would give him malpractice insurance, he had his medical license pulled in at least two states, and it’s suspected he sold illegally harvested organs to a group of rich people who wanted to eat them. He’s been legally found responsible for rape he’s committed in civil court, and he was found guilty in criminal court of dozens of felonies related to him stealing hospital records when he lost his license and privileges and may or may not have sold them to the last people you’d ever want to have access to them. He’s wearing a lobster bib and licks his lips as he says ''only I have the skill to save you, I don’t even want to, but I will… ‘’ He also forwards that everything is falling to ruin, and nothing is good now, and people are dying from surgeries left and right, and the people who died on his surgeries were fake deaths orcastrated by invisible foes only he can see or stop, so it was never his fault all those people died on his watch.

Good thing I have severe short term memory loss.

It’s sharp metal, 6in. So roughly hand size, it’s more like a custom figurine type of deal.

I agree with your point seeing as how the article dosen’t have this info, but the context that He’s a known burglar, has done at least 4 years in prison and ‘but it’s just a novelty item’ has been a tactic of criminals in England for a long time, it makes more sense why he was busted.

Yeah, people think they’ll lose something of themselves, but no one is successful due to ADHD, they are successful in spite of it.

Yes, a total stranger on the internet with half a paragraph of information would clearly be the reasonable train of wild assumptions to ride to a definitive conclusion. Medical professionals are clearly wrong on this one.

One of the biggest factors is that the courts can’t get testimony from members of the executive branch of government, meaning if he does something insanely evil, as long as only his admin that knows anything about it, he can’t be effectively prosecuted. It’s pretty fucking terrible.

Ten years ago ‘‘Now new GREEN liquid dish soap!’’

‘‘Well if I tell you now it’ll ruin the plan, you see it’s gotta be a surprise’’

He literally said this the last election.

Eldest of millennial.

I voted for ‘generation crash and burn’ but it got cut off on the print out, so…

I heard Venus never even had an infection of a biological nature.

Does evolutionary pressure only exist on individuals? I’ve never heard that. There’s a wide variety of species that are highly socially organized, do you not accept that that’s through evolutionarily pressure?

The fact that Clarence Thomas has his name on this ruling really helps illustrate how easy and often cheap it is to simply buy rulings.

Very similar to Nazis path to power, a lot of provocative action, violence, and people stop giving a shit that they are constantly doing this, an attempt at a violent coup, it dosen’t work, then the people in power create legal pretexts to allow a seemingly legal way to dictatorship.

That’s what all these articles missed, this isn’t a first offense, the man is a known burglar, did 4 years previously

It’s like I tell my kids, an adult is just a child who got old. It’s also why a lot of cultures have a concept of adulthood that has nothing to do with reaching sexual maturity alone.

What I wrote – Very easily impressed with basic factual statements

What you think it means – there’s something wrong with people who are learning new things.

Does ‘‘basic factual statements’’ mean ‘‘new information that someone is just now learning’’. Can it also apply to information they already know, or believe is true? Can it also be referring to basic knowledge nearly everyone knows?

Does ‘being very easily impressed’ include a situation where someone reacts to information in a typical fashion? Does it exclude adults learning or recognizing factual information and responding with a simple agreement, such as ‘yeah that’s true’? Or is this an indication that an overreacting response is the dead giveaway?

1. Did the sentance make a claim something is wrong with being a child?

2. Did the sentence claim that learning new information is likewise something wrong?

Please write one 5 sentance paragraph explaining your opinion on the above two numbered questions. Proofreading will not be necessary.

I bet if you killed everyone on the court and in the legislature and replaced themb with your personal sycophants, they would probably agree it was an ‘official act’

But that kid was killed by an attack marked ‘‘to whom it may concern’’, not a focused deliberate attack with his name on it. He was a casualty, not a victim of assassination.

time to prepare for a harsh right wing fascist regime

Wow, that’s a good point, but some people may take it the wrong way and say things like ‘what taco bell are we meeting up at to plan to depose the current massively corrupt Supreme… taco?’ ‘Is surprise attacks on Taco Bell’s military installations a viable objective?’ ‘Would the taco bell ‘fresh crew’ join the efforts to over turn the corporate structure?’ ‘Or should we all just move to Spain and enjoy the authentic taste of a secular society with universal healthcare and tapas as far as the eye can see’?