Originally it was going to be “over the last twenty years” but I decided to be more flexible.

A lot of discussions about how society has changed or how the world is different always circle around to smartphones, social media, “no one talks to each other in person, they’re on their phones always” and the like.

Outside of those topics, what else has changed, by your perception?

  • hypna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    When I was in high school, gay was the generic negative word. If Wendys gave you a medium fry when you ordered a large - gay. If your homie cancelled plans last minute - gay. If you slipped on the stairs and busted your ass - gay. It’s bizarre in hindsight.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same. “Gay Humor” is a thing, probably still a thinh. If you act feminine as a guy, its “gay”. If you act too emotional over a girl, it’s “gay”. If you answer a question wrong, your a [R-Slur]. Every you had a slight problem with is a “bitch” even the guys. Sometime the occational gay word equivalent that starts with “f”.

      Oh this is a blue city btw. Circa 2015-2020

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The way retard has changed over the years is wild to me. Cause around me there are large communities of people with mental and physical disabilities who aggressively try to tell people that they are infact retarded. It’s the word they grew up with and are fighting tooth and nail to keep it from turning into a slur. Even tho it’s been used as one against those very people for years.

        It’s such a weird thing to watch from the side line. Makes me wonder if this is what it was like during the rise of rap and the n word.

        Tho it’s also getting to the point there’s so many letter-slurs that it’s getting stupid. At some point feels like we are going to have to either just stop caring and accept that intentions matter more then the words them self. Else we are goanna run out of letters to describe slurs.

        Makes it very hard to have meaningful discourse around the topic. To be fair the fear of bans, and punishment for even saying some words regardless of context or topic also just makes it very iffy to talk about this topic in many places.

        Hell iv seen people banned on etymology fourms and subs because someone said a “letter” slur with in the context of explaining the origin of the word. It’s crazy what the internet has become recently.

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yea that one got me by surprise. Not sure when it changed, but a few years back a friend told me I offended someone by using it.

          I was confused - stopped using it though.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    From an American perspective, flying on an airplane sucks. 9/11/01 resulted in a whole bunch of security theatre at the airport and airlines have slowly whittled away whatever comfort or convience remained.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You used to get proper meals even if it was a crazy short flight. Now it’s like $6 bag of cheese it.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Remember being able to walk people to their gate, hug them goodbye, and watch the plane leave? Now you can only do this if you’re taking an unaccompanied minor to their gate.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why specify the year? Everyone knows what 9/11 is, it’s not going to get confused with another 9/11.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Because over time people will forget the year. Like many hear July 4th and couldn’t tell you it is for 1776. People get lazy, and knowing the year gives a nice reference for time and how it has gone by.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m close. I only fly to see family and drive everywhere else. If I can’t complete the vacation without driving I’m just not doing it.

        It’s weird because flights are cheaper but then I don’t have a vehicle where I land and most of the places I want to go I need a vehicle. I’m not much of a city boy.

      • rImITywR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Domestic flights should basically not be a thing. Trains should be the default option if you don’t have to cross an ocean.

          • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I would gladly take the Texas Eagle to Chicago on a regular basis to see family if it didn’t cost $1,800 for a very small room in the sleeper car. I prefer the train to flying or driving. It’s just a LOT cheaper to load up the minivan and drive 12 hours instead.

        • Lowpast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ahh yes, trade 6 hours for a 3 day, $400 train ride to NYC.

          Lmfao what a shit suggestion

          • rImITywR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            With the current level of train infrastructure and service, I agree with you. That is why domestics flights are a thing. But trains would be a much better choice if rail wasn’t actively defunded and sabotaged for the last 70 years or so.

            Its this lack of imagination of what could be (and already exists around the world) that makes everyone laugh at Americans.

            • Lowpast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Even with high speed rail you’re looking at 30+ hours from Seattle to NYC. And that’s optimistic, ignoring the numerous alpine mountains. No thanks.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Why do people always go here?

                • Fine: coast to coast, north to south should have flights. However almost all domestic flights are shorter and most of those are between city pairs where rail could be more efficient.
                • Fine: keep your bush pilots and feeder airlines, but 80% of the population is in metro areas.
                • high speed rail advocates generally speak in terms of population density and distance for choosing the right option: generally city pairs less than 500 miles apart can be more efficiently served by rail. That’s most cities in the US, and metro areas are 80% the population

                We don’t need to argue about it not being absolute,if you can recognized the predominant needs

  • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve noticed an increase in noticing other people being not well, but a decrease in the depth that people care. It used to feel that you might have one or two friends who cared about you deeply. They’d drop everything to help and wouldn’t ask for anything in return. Now it seems like everyone cares about everyone but not enough to actually do anything.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s more like everyone is literally at their limit for taking care of themselves and literally has no energy leftover for others.

      I think this is purposeful to socially divide us.

      • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Could be. But I also see it as a change of mindset. It used to be you cared deeply for a few people. Now it seems like you’re expected to care about everyone. And if you spread it that far it becomes thin.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah.

      We had twins nearly 2 years ago.

      I never really expected “help” but when we were pregnant there were people coming over every day telling us how much they were going to help. My wife has a huge social group, it was kinda overwhelming.

      Since they were born, there’s been 1 person who has just been amazing. She’s here for a few hours several times a week and just plays with the kids. She’s been really consistent.

      No one else really knows how to help I think. Or maybe they think everyone else is helping. Or maybe just doing their own thing (which is fine ofc).

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “no one talks to each other in person, they’re on their phones always”

    No one talks to each other on their phones either. They send texts.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve been arrested, held up at gun point, and spent a few weeks in a Texas jail in the 90s because I like smoking weed. Now I have 3 weed stores within 2 miles of me, and it’s as mundane as buying a loaf of bread. So that’s a positive in my book.

    • tipicaldik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      haha yeah I’ve been a pothead for 40-several years and I got my Florida MMU card last year. It took me a while to get past my “kid in a candy store” phase. Geez I wasn’t used to having ANY choice, let alone that many choices 😆

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Way more casual social marijuana use. Way less alcoholics and empty 40s on the sidewalks. Big improvement

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was trying to think of specifics, but they’re already getting mentioned. I’d just say a lot of these things stem from there being literally double the amount of humans alive right now than when my dad was born. An individual is devalued immensely and cultural cohesion is completely shot.

  • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Smoking cigarettes isn’t just not cool anymore, You’re actually likely to be socially ostracized in a lot of countries where it used to be popular. My perspective is the US, which is a very clear example of this.

    Weed, however, is way more accepted. To the point where if I’m using a vape I almost feel a social pressure to clarify to people I’m getting high and not smoking nicotine.

    It’s rather funny when you think about it

  • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    We used to take for granted that everybody agreed Nazis and Russians were bad.

    Nothing against Russians suffering under Putin’s boot. We have a whole new sympathy for you now.

  • squarebrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cable TV use to be something that teathered us all together in a way. We were all stuck on the same schedule for premiers of new episodes of different shows so we all had a common thing to talk about come the next day. Now I have no idea what’s playing on what service and have just given up on staying up to date on the new shows. I could have access to $TVShow but probably won’t watch it because I don’t like to binge watch so it takes me longer to catch up and by the time I do it has already left the minds of my peers so why bother.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I could have access to $TVShow but probably won’t watch it because I don’t like to binge watch so it takes me longer to catch up and by the time I do it has already left the minds of my peers so why bother.

      I enjoy not having my entertainment options constrained by whether other people are watching them at the same time, so I’m loving the change. Especially since I didn’t like over half of the shows that ‘everybody’ watched.

    • tipicaldik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      haha my dad was a tech nerd and when he bought his first programmable VCR back in the '80s he was on top of the world. He was recording everything

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        A very popular show that everyone would watch live as it aired the first time. Then you could talk about it with everyone for a week because everyone is on the same episode. There was little to no ways to watch it if you missed it and you’d basically be screwed.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh I wasn’t allowed to watch tele growing up. No wonder I have no idea what this is

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I haven’t heard the term but I assume it means watching TV on the station’s schedule. You know, broadcast and cable.