• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Many film makers use location releases signed by the owner of the establishment for this reason. Example: https://www.dmacinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/location-recording-permission-form.pdf

    In many cases the location owner still has the right to the location in your video. There’s also many countries with laws where you are simply not allowed to act commercially out of a rented room. There are also many countries where porn or sexual performances like these require preregistered locations and extra licensing (besides the countries where it’s banned completely).

    I’m not familiar with the rules of the UK. But in my country you can sue if they rented it as a normal consumer without sharing the intent.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Feelings about AirBnB aside, it’s kind of a dick move to create a potential biohazard for someone else (I highly doubt the area was properly sanitized, and I highly doubt 100+ dudes are all going to be clean).

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like this shouldn’t even be a post here. Maybe in a news community, as this links to a story, but not AskLemmy of all places.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you don’t want people fucking in your property, don’t rent out your property. Seems pretty simple to me.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    When you rent a domicile to someone you are responsible for guaranteeing their private use and enjoyment of the domicile without undie restrictions for the term of the agreement.

    If somebody films in the domicile, it’s none of lessor’s business. Do you think every talking head YouTuber who films a talking head piece from a hotel needs to get approval from the hotel? How about ticktokers? What about people doing personal video calls with there family?

    No, it would be a unreasonable burden for someone’s quiet enjoyment of their domicile to not be able to film.

    As stipulated in the posters question there is no legally actionable recourse to a landlord for just filming in the location.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      AieBnB owners can set a guest limit, and I’d have to imagine saying a max of (to pick a random number) ten guests isn’t an unreasonable burden, so in that hypothetical… but I’m guessing that particular AirBnB owner didn’t put a guest limit in place, so all they can really do is pursue extra cleanup charges if applicable.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Objects don’t have rights, people do. You can require your consent to be in a monetized video, but a house doesnt have consent to give haha. If you don’t want someone filming the inside of your property, don’t allow them in. Especially don’t ask them to pay you to come in.

          • stinky@redlemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t be angry at me, you’re the one who focused on the wrong words. It was one sentence my guy, all you had to do was read it to the end. Lol. Have a day 🫱

            • Stern@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Right back at ya king. It was one sentence, all you had to do was read it to the end.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m pretty sure, in private residential transactions, breaching a policy or rule is not grounds for a lawsuit, it may be grounds for terminating the lease. But assuming this person has vacated the property by the time it was discovered, it’s a moot issue

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I doubt she could sleep 100 times in 24h so maybe she just slept with all of them at once? Doesn’t it have to be on one bed tho?

    You write an article about a whore taking 100 dicks in a day. Sex is not a bad word.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Sex isn’t a bad word”

      Insults woman for having too much sex

      Make up your mind. Or is sex only OK when men do it?

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      She never took a dick, they all stayed attached. Rather, she engaged in coitus.

      See how silly that sounds?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Can I play? So let’s say a gentleman takes out his tallywacker and I’m inclined to give him a blow job, so I ask his permission. How does one properly blow on said tallywacker?

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why find the need to call the woman a “whore”?

      Nothing against criticizing the use of euphemistic language on the article, otherwise.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, it’s a generally unpleasant accusation that doesn’t really apply here, like calling a random infantryman a hitman, because they were paid to shoot people.

        Except, even in light of current events, most people still consider shooting people to be worse than having sex with them.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Tbf the differences aren’t that far in either case.

          Infantryman - Kills when paid, ordered by the gov

          Hitman - Kills when paid, ordered by civilians

          Whore (prostitute) - Fucks when paid, no camera

          Actress (porn) - Fucks when paid, has camera

          Honestly if I were the type of dude to go whorin’, I’d record it so it’s legal for both parties and then if I “decide not to release it” it is what it is, decent loophole (pun so very intended). Can’t bring myself to pay for it though, feels icky, half the fun is the woman actually liking/loving you (one you like/love ykwim), I may as well just crank the hog otherwise.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Next record is 1000/24h.

    Now let us drop the euphemistic language.

    There are 1440 minutes in a day. To achieve the stunt of having sex with 1000 men in that window, that implies a 1,44 minutes time slot. Which implies she will have to “service” more than one man at a time.

    This woman is risking severe physical, mental and emotional trauma.

    Hasn’t this bad experience left a bad enough memory to dissuade from another attempt?

    I remember reading a cover on the world largest gang bang orgy and the event had to be stopped because the women risked vaginal tearing.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      From the article it reads 100 was quite traumatic for her already… why she intends to push furthernis beyond me

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly I don’t get it either. I think she needs professional mental health care immediately or we shouldn’t feel bad for her tears as they aren’t real. I hope we don’t have to feel bad for her but I am afraid that she needs help, a lot of it.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      “I know people won’t understand why I do this,” Lily said. “But this is my journey, and I’m learning more about myself with each step even when it’s hard.”

      To each their own. It wouldn’t be for me, but this is something she wants to do, that’s up to her.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Press charges? Like criminal charges? Not in the US.

    I suspect she could get banned from Airbnb for making essentially a porn video without the host’s consent.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Them again, is it illegal to film yourself in privacy?

      Sounds like USA religious prudism / click bait.

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I believe a business is supposed to get permission from the Airbnb host for any commercial filming. Whether it’s a reality show, a TV commercial, or adult entertainment.

          • _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Let’s say UK, since it was filmed there for example. I mean surely the Airbnb owners have a good case right?

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Against what exactly, fucking and filming?

              I mean if they destroyed something, sure, but having sex? The mattress in a popular AirBnB have probably seen more jizz&dicks than than that.

              • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s likely against policy for having parties, and if they’re filming for commercial purposes, there’s likely a policy against commercial use of the property. The stay is intended for the amount of people that were indicated when reserving the place.

                Suing would likely be mainly for cleaning costs, and perhaps replacing some items? Not sure how much compensation they would get beyond that.

        • _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thanks, yes - this is what I was looking for. Just thinking from a Airbnb renter perspective, such a stunt would drop the value of the property + service fees such as changing the mattresses etc.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because of the scale of it I guess, but people rent AirBnBs and fuck all the time, so hard to make that illegal I think.

            Also, maybe the value would go up, who knows, but if it did, nobody would claim the actress should have a cut right?