If we want people to behave differently we would find more success by not starting with the premise they are brainwashed. That is my thesis.
If we want people to behave differently we would find more success by not starting with the premise they are brainwashed. That is my thesis.
I’m confused, you down vote me, meaning I didn’t contribute to the discussion to your standard, but you provided a thoughtful comment.
Hostility isn’t a great way to build dialog.
It’s difficult to persuade people to your lifestyle, and your point of view, if you’r starting position is that their brainwashed if they don’t agree with you.
Ikea shelf instead of a rack, but I used metal shelves for better thermals!
Top to bottom:
Some people want too politicalize everything. They see it as a war. They see having a right side and a wrong side, and the truth is just inconvenient. It’s better to persuade people than communicate truth.
The Maldives is a very small enclosed space. Whatever Island you go to, or resort you go to, there’s not a lot of diversity of things to do. You’re going to see everything very quickly, and most of your time is going to be " relaxing ".
If you’re in the mental space to be able to look past your ex-wife and their new husband. Go. Hang out with your son, go skiing, go fishing, crab hunting, paddle ball, anything.
If, however, even seeing your ex triggers emotions in you that you can’t control. That’s going to be a problem in a very small enclosed space.
Never go to a place because it’s popular, if you wouldn’t go there if nobody else was there, you probably won’t enjoy it when other people are there.
If you have a deep and strong interest in a place or a thing, it’s great to visit no matter what. Low season might be better
a office and guest room, being on the social travel circuit for friends is really good in staying connected, or if we party too hard they can just crash here.
If you have a phone at your house, it’s trivial to know who owns the phone.
I respect your sense of morality, but it is not universal. Your downvoting me, which is just petty, speaks to your actual sense of morality.
the bioavailability of nutrition and protein is outstandingly better from natural animal sources.
Live your life any way you like, try to make my people unhealthy and you will find resistance.
Like I said, I’m happy for you to eat in any way which you feel comfortable, just don’t remove the options from others.
Bioavailability of nutrition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6Qea59IrA0 this is a video from a medical perspective on the global meat conspiracy, especially when talking about recommended diets.
I’m all for independence, everybody can eat how they like, when you start restricting options for people, you are now responsible for their health outcomes. And that is very very complicated.
The article mentions they suspect being disconnected from the network causes the reboot. That’s a great idea. That should be implemented as well on gos.
What drama?
There are many healthy lifestyles, and if someone decides to go full vegan that doesn’t interfere with anyone else…
true… but you could say that about anything, just trying new strategies
you can program without math, but it will be hard to pass a rigorous interview without math.
You should strive to learn symbolic math at least, and make sure you can do all the leet code problems and explanations using whatever math you are comfortable with.
factorio, hell let loose, zomboid, skylines I
Don’t eat a entire box of thin mints.
You have been tricked, you have been conned - Both statements put people on the back foot.
It’s more persuasive to talk about what objectives and outcomes people want, and advocate for the best path to getting those outcomes. Jumping to a interpretive conclusion is the rhetorically going up hill, because you haven’t communicated and persuaded the other party to arrive at the conclusion organically.