An actual quote I saw today posted on Twitter: “Florida is a conservative Christian state, and they voted against murdering unborn babies. The democratic process is complete. They can leave if they want to do that.” There’s a lot to unpack there. I also got into an argument with the guy who posted it, who claimed somehow that it’s not ok for Federal government to regulate Women, but if states wants to do it then it’s ok, and they should just leave to another state then. like… wow. America is a strange place

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why stop at abortion? Which Bible verse is that anyway? Let’s get to work and add more laws. How about the one for adultery? That’s a good one.

    Leviticus 20:10 threatened that ‘the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife … the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death’, while Deuteronomy 22:22 thundered, if a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then both of them shall die

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    That vote was like… 57% to 43% in favor of abortion, and only failed because it needed to hit 60%. Ironically the amendment that made that requirement possible didn’t pass with 60% of the vote.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think the tiniest sliver of silver lining is that republicans seem to want states to decide on a whole slew of things, meaning that any anti-trans legislation likely won’t mean I need to leave the country, only sell my house and move to another state and pray I can find a job there.

    This timeline sucks.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, they want states to decide on issues they’re losing federally but still let the fed decide things if they’re winning. There is no consistency, just temporary workarounds.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Abortion protection was proposed as a constitutional amendment because the backwards -ass gerrymandered legislature here is much more conservative than the population. A majority of us voted for freedom of choice even though the amendment on the ballot had bold text added by the governor, including the dubious claim that it would “increase the number of abortions performed in the state”. They only added these annotations to the two amendments DeSantis opposed.

    I was born here, my kids were born here, I am progressive, my kids are progressive, all y’all dehumanizing us, why? We are just people, like you!

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    So we’ve been going on for a pretty long time about how Florida is basically largely going to get completely lmaoed by climate change, and trying to warn people moving there and so on.

    But as time goes on, I’m thinking maybe it’s best if they suffer the consequences of their actions, and let the ocean have this one.

    Refugees will of course not be accepted in accordance with the new regime policy either, and FEMA has been fully dissolved.

    • Veneroso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Climate change is the term that the GOP came up with in focus groups because it was “less scary”.

      Call it what it is. Global warming.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think global warming as a term is not great, because it fails at communicating the end result of the overall average temperature increase, which is more chaotic weather on account of the increased energy present in the system. Sometimes this will mean temporary local reductions in temperature, and sometimes it will mean unusually cold years in places. Don’t give people the option to use ‘bUt iT’s cOlDeR tHiS yEAr sO hOw cAn gLoBaL wArMiNg bE rEaL’ as an easy argument.

        Climate change is the more accurate term, but I do prefer terms that more accurately communicate the severity of the situation, such as the climate crisis, for example.

        • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Absolutely

          Global warming’ gave us that senator with the snowball

          In an ideal world we wouldn’t have to moderate accurate terms to prevent bad actors making dumb arguments

          But this is clearly not an ideal world

    • send_me_your_ink@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The problem is not everyone who wants to can move. Picking up everything and moving to New England or the West Coast is not viable for people making minimum wage.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s more viable for renters than people who have to sell a house no one will buy but is too much of their net worth for them to feel like they can walk away from it.

        In practice, sure, the situation is actually similar but the homeowners won’t feel like it is and humans are mostly illogical.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you’re talking about stress, sure, a renter can relocate more easily than a home owner. Stress isn’t worth dollars, though. A homeowner is still much more likely to have the financial ability to relocate. If renters had spare cash of a substantial amount, don’t you think they’d put it towards owning?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            How much do you think a mortgage down payment is? A U-Haul rental?

            You’re not wrong, but that’s a pretty wild point of order.

            • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              People will buy the house for sale. The country made it clear that half of the population is happy with one of the sides. Reds want to move out of blue states all the same. So yes, a down payment and a moving rental are a magnitude of order apart, but relocating still introduces huge expenses. A 600 mile trip with a 15’ truck and car trailer is about $1,000 (it’s the mileage rate that gets you). Hotels if needed, road food, security down payments, and gas are the easy ones to point out. Then there’s the added stress and costs of scoping out your destination, finding a suitable place, not being employed during the transition, losing your current social networks, and pulling it off solo. My point is that “just move” isn’t feasible to many of the people most affected by the predicted changes.

      • loomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They should have voted then, or if they did vote, vote a different way. America is going to get the government they deserve.

        Edit: and those poor people, those people are the cost of others’ decisions. Oh well. Sucks to be American

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    These are hard times, and more are coming. And I don’t exactly remember the quote, but it’s along the lines of:

    “When a run-away team of horses is headed off a cliff, the driver can sometime be seen encouraging them on, presumably, since he knows he cannot stop them, he at least feels some sense of control over the situation.”

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      And go where? Get off twitter and come to Lemmy to get dogpiled for not having views that perfectly align with ours. People wont get off twitter untill you offer them a better alternative.

    • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      People can share tweets virtually anywhere by screenshotting it and reposting it on Facebook, reddit, etc. I saw it on Facebook and clicked it.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They voted for abortion rights at the state level, then voted in a Senator, two Representatives, and Trump into office so they can pass a national abortion ban that will apply to their state.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        In some other states yes, but the abortion protection in Florida failed to pass, leaving their “6-week” (2 weeks from detectability) ban in place.

        (Edit: on my phone, didn’t see you were replying such that your “they” refers to the 57% of those who voted, which was insufficient to pass the amendment.)

    • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      57% If Floridians voted in favor of abortion rights.

      One small correction: 57% of the people who voted, voted in favor. Florida has approximately 22 million people as of the last census, with about 17.732 million over the age of 18. Here are the vote counts:

      No: 4,547,767 (42.8%) Yes: 6,068,933 (57.2%) This means about 7.115 million people in Florida did not vote, so approximately 40.1% of the adult population voted. Truly wild to see.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m rapidly coming to the conclusion that people who cannot be bothered to vote shouldn’t really count.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        22million people who are eligible to vote? I want to know if that’s everyone who lives in Florida (man women, children, citizens, non-citizens etc), or just eligible voters.

        • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I updated my comment, initially I had the wrong figure. I went back to the US Census website, and looked again. Then, I took the number who are over 18 years of age only, and subtracted that out.

          • shottymcb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Your updated number is still off by over a million. Not everyone over the age of 18 is eligible to vote. Not that it changes the point much, but you want to look for eligible voters vs over 18.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Any sane person needs to GTFO out of Florida anyway. The weather is only going to get more extreme and so are the christo fascists.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m just trying to finish my degree to leave. It’s a shame Miami is so unique because I can’t find any place with such diversity. Only comparable alternative I could find in the US was NYC.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most people actually voted in favor of the florida abortion ammendment. The threshold is just unusually higher (60%) than most states. It was close to 60% but just a little shy at around 57%

    With a different national environment with just a bit higher dem turnout, it probably would’ve passed

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Both abortion and weed should’ve passed, they had the majority.
      The case to put the 60% rule in place DIDNT EVEN GET 60% ON ITS VOTE

      • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I commented this elsewhere, but I’ll say it here too :)

        57% of the people who voted, voted in favor. Florida has approximately 22 million people as of the last census, with about 17.732 million over the age of 18. Here are the vote counts:

        No: 4,547,767 (42.8%) Yes: 6,068,933 (57.2%) This means about 7.115 million people in Florida did not vote, so approximately 40.1% of the adult population voted. Truly wild to see.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Conservatives want their women to be able to get abortions while also being able to tell everyone they oppose it. It’s a phenomenon called “the only moral abortion is my abortion”.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean the “Only Moral Abortion is my Abortion “ The rich will just travel overseas for a clinic and spend a week somewhere on a beach for the rest of week sipping on cocktails, while the poor will just get poorer, sicker and hungrier