Click a link and need to go back 10x to get back. Yes, I enjoy the footballs.

      • murtaza64@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Seems cool, but it’s currently missing some pretty important languages (Hindi, Urdu, Thai, Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, Swahili, etc). I’d put up with something limited like this if it was FOSS and/or selfhostable but it appears not to be

        • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. Also, it doesn’t have Latin (used for both scientific terms such as “Athene Cunicularia”, philosophical such as “Homo homini lupus est”, as well for liturgical and ritualistic texts, especially occult texts) nor Hebrew.

      • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        While it offers a concurrent alternative to Google translate, it still lacks some features, as @[email protected] mentioned, many languages are missing. In my case, I sometimes experiment with terms across various languages, sometimes Hindi (“O param Devi Kaali”), sometimes latin (“Vita mortem manducat, Mors manducat vitam” is a latin phrase I wrote myself, following Latin grammar rules), sometimes Hebrew (especially for Gematria calculation using numerical values from Hebrew letters (Aleph is 1, Bet is 2, Gimmel is 3, and so on) after translating/transliterating a word/name such as “לילית”). For these kinds of experimentation, DeepL can’t really be of use, so I need either Google Translate or Bing Translate (both support the aforementioned languages).

  • ober9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Aren’t they scamming their advertisers too? Because if you click the back button a bunch of times it’s gonna reload a bunch of them on every click. At least if your internet is fast enough.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Impressions are usually deduped, meaning multiple impressions from the same user during the same session are just counted as one. The big ad networks are extremely careful to avoid miscounting of any sort and will generally err on the side of undercounting rather than overcounting (since telling advertisers they got more impressions or clicks than reported is way better than telling them the numbers were accidentally inflated). Of course, there’s the occasional bug, but it mostly works as expected.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not for this, of course. It’s because in the world of single page applications built in react and angular where there is no physical back, like no actual server page to go back to just JavaScript, you have to code in what the back button means. Even though there’s no server calls to ask for a new page. New page. Most people still expect that forward and back will still go forward and back in standard navigation.

      Sites like this it’s pretty clear that they just overwrite that with the last 20 calls to their own page, but the alternative is that single page applications would not be able to have forward or back functionality

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Great I’ll just add a unique guid to each path that is ignored and returns to the same place. You show me a 10 foot fence I’ll show you an 11 foot ladder.

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean, I get that. I was making a joke. But 12 ft ladder? Load in sandbox and compare html. Your move.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                14 ft fence: Diff in html. If less than 10 lines different, ban.

                • PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  15 ft ladder:

                  <div hidden>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  </div>
                  
    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a very “dumb” implementation of a generally useful feature. Browsers don’t keep track of how many times you’re redirected to the same site or try to consolidate the back-button list accordingly, but they certainly could. Wouldn’t be surprised if there was a plugin to this effect.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They actually do. To avoid infinite loops. If a URL redirects to the identical URL for more than ~5 times most browsers will refuse to load and show an error instead.

        That’s why sites like this will generate new URLs with the same content.

  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ve reminded me of a similar frustration that I’ve never found the answer to - though it may be adblock related - in that whenever I open a link to eBay it completely wipes the history for that tab. Or possibly it opens a new tab and kills the parent. Either way I always forget about it until the next time and then it drives me mad all over again.

    • deejay4am@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reddit has been doing this when I click a result from a Google search (yeah, sometimes you have to)

      It’s fucking annoying and I hope whatever JavaScript trick lets them do this gets blocked

      • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use a Firefox based browser and this hasn’t happened to me, are you using Chromium or Safari? Could be a browser specific issue

        • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Firefox. I’m fairly convinced it’s something to do with UBO or one of the blocklists but I’ve never taken the time to dig into it properly.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Press and hold the back button. A lot of times this will show a history where you can select a page further back.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    microsoft does this with their community support/forums/whatever and it’s annoying when you’re trying to look up a problem in google. :///

        • Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Alright lol so long as you understand being forged by the fires of the early internet deems you responsible to be aware of such tomfoolery against us internet patrons. Convince 10 computer illiterate friends to install ublock origin and all shall be forgiven haha

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Also: Algorithmic generated feeds where you try to click on one thing, but you click on the next thing in the list and when you click back, the feed looks completely different because it has new information on you. That thing you wanted to click on is gone and will never return.

      • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What’s worse is that YouTube sometimes doesn’t do that, i.e. when you hit back it shows the same list from the cache or something. It gives you hope and makes it worse on those occasions when it does fully refresh on back.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s actually how I do my Lemmy feed. I have one chance to comment on a thread and if I don’t do it, when the page refreshes I lose it forever.

      I’ve learned to accept that there are just some things the universe never wanted me to comment on.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d love that, my entire frontpage is the same 30 things over and over unless I deliberately sort for something then it’s a DIFFERENT 30 things over and over

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Try some different sorting options. I’ve found “Active” and “Hot” to be kind of shitty (though to be fair, I haven’t really used them in like 6 months so maybe they’re better).

          I usually go for “Top 6 Hours” or “Top 12 Hours” for stuff that’s not too old and relatively active.

      • ...m...@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        …and now you’ve hit upon my other peeve: (mostly shopping) sites coded to disable browsing links in a new tab…

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Perhaps it’s because I never raw dog the web, and using uBlock Origins on “medium mode” somehow fixes it, but I don’t think I have ever experienced that.

          I have experienced sites that block right clicking, and that has always infuriated me. But I was able to get a little FF extension that disables right click blocking on websites. Which is pretty useful for downloading videos on sites that try to stop you from downloading their videos (though some have wisened up and can completely disable the ability to save a video through that method. The “save video as” option is completely greyed out). yt-dlp usually works in those cases, or one of the countless web-based video downloaders… but still annoying.

          • ...m...@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            …ah, i may be conflating contextal menus with opening new tabs, since that’s the primary UI mode i use to do so: regardless, any kind of shenanigans which aim to disable application-level UI get under my skin…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Youtube recommended videos does this. Not a huge issue because I can always search for the video myself but it’s annoying.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ugh yes.

        Though on desktop I’ve completely switched over to using FreeTube, and I’ve been loving it. The order of the videos in the feed does not change. It’s great.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is one of the absolute greatest reasons to support opening most everything in a new tab (as long as you don’t end up like my mom who at one point had over 100 tabs on her phone). Doesn’t matter if it’s a link from the same website, from a search engine, or whatever else there is. New tab.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What helps with this is clicking links with mousewheeldown, I automatically opens in a new tab. Also MWD on the tab label will close it, so you don’t have to aim for the ‘x’.

      A mouse with thum buttons is really handy as they do foreward and back, double clicking that gets you out of the issue caused in op