• bitMasque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, screw that whataboutism. When I went to school, I learned so much information that is virtually useless to most people, and not nearly enough skills and knowledge that would actually be helpful in daily life. I would like to see the situation improve for future generations.

        Analogue clocks are everywhere and being able to read them is still important. Besides, if schools aren’t even capable of teaching something so simple to students, I think that calls into question their ability to teach far more complex things.

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s because analog clocks are becoming obsolete. You can scream about the young peoples all you want but that’s the reality.

          • bitMasque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m not screaming about the young people; I was “the young people” not that long ago. Not everyone who criticizes education is an out of touch boomer resisting every societal change.

            Actually, analogue clocks have been obsoleted in almost every way by digital clocks for at least half a century, as digital wristwatches first hit the market in the 1970s. And yet, analogue clocks are still found everywhere. Classes, stores, train stations, homes, offices, not to mention the majority of wristwatches, still mostly use analogue clocks. In fact, excluding screens, I wouldn’t be surprised if most people came across more analogue clocks than digital clocks on a daily basis. They’re technologically obsolete, but haven’t fallen out of use.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I have to have an analog clock within sight in the morning. When I first wake up I’m too tired and bleary eyed to think about numbers but I know what angle the minute hand will be at when I have leave to catch the bus to work. When you’re familiar with an analog clock it’s far more user friendly than looking at some numbers and have to do some math. Sure it’s simple math, but first thing in the morning, I’d rather just glance at the minute hand and when I see the angle I just know.

              So I don’t think it’s not going away despite it being obsolete, it’s not going away because it’s more user friendly. Sure there’s a learning curve, but once you’ve gotten the hang of it, it’s a more efficient way for a human to get a sense of time, which in many cases is more important than having a numerical representation of time.

        • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          We also need to teach them how to write in cursive so they can read the declaration of independence.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Perhaps the fact that we pay them like 30 grand a year is a factor? That’s how much my one bedroom apartment costs 😂 there’s no money left over for food or loans or electricity or gas

          Financial stress has been proven to make you dumber

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          How is that whataboutism?

          It’s not that schools have become unable to teach kids to read analog clocks or kids have become unable to learn it. It’s not that they can’t it’s that they don’t

          But speaking of whataboutism, your argument is literally “well what about all the useless stuff that I learned in school???”
          How about they stop teaching useless stuff, and the first things they can throw out are cursive and analog clocks.

    • Max Günther@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are creating more and more idiots out there. The trend of “Help, our students don’t understand xyz, let’s stop teaching that immediately!” is disgusting. Maybe think of teaching it in a different way or just spending more time on that topic?

    • Don Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fun fact, 10:10 is the default time most photographers take photos of a clock/watch to help display all the logos and things a watch face has to offer!

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ugh kids these days can’t even prime a Magneto What’s next morse code!?!

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It floors me just how many people in this thread feel like analog clock reading is a useless/outdated skill.

    But I’m of the opinion that there’s no such thing as a truly outdated and useless skill, so I’m not sure I have the capability to empathize with those people…

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I perceive remaining time much better with an analogue clock. It’s also why I perceive time in fractions. I think it’s the superior clock, and people should probably learn to fucking read one since they’re everywhere.

      I also think it’s kind of insane that we’re not at least learning how to read cursive in schools anymore. There are countless documents written in English that English speakers will not be able to properly decipher.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be fair i learnt cursive and i can still not decipher most of it, even my own writing (or rather especially my own writing)

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      As a person who prefers analog clocks I disagree

      What benefit does analog bring over digital other than nostalgia?
      Once is objectively faster to read granularly, by the minute

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s not useless.

      It’s just less useful that other things that should be taught in school. There is only so much time in a school year, and it shouldn’t replace those more useful things in the curriculum.

  • Emmie@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Analog clocks are kind of annoying tbh. Sometimes you need that little extra energy you have to spend on wondering whether it is 11:37 or 11:38 already by carefully visually bisecting the circle section between 7 and 8.
    Millimetres of white space keep you wondering about the nature of analogue vs digital and measurement uncertainty while you have better things to do but cannot just give up on OCDing whether it is exactly 11:37:30 already or maybe it is 11:37:35? And boom in these seconds you were wondering it is already pointless because the past moved to present and now it is time to wonder if it is 11:38:15 or 11:38:30

    Whereas for digital it is just: oh it is 11:11 on 11.11.11 how cool

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love having an analog clock. It makes it feel like you have more time compared to a digital clock, making me more relaxed. For example, if the time is 12:34 PM, my subconscious will think, “Ahh, shit, 26 more minutes before 1 PM.” But with an analog clock, I read it as around half an hour before 1 PM. The visual representation also helps, like seeing that there is a distance that the hands need to travel to reach a certain time.

      All in all, I very much prefer having analog clocks vs digital when given the chance.

        • el_abuelo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between “most clocks” and “most clocks I’ve seen” - especially if your clock experience is restricted to schools.

          Do you see a lot of schools? Do you know whether the schools you’ve been to all use the same supplier? How broad is your school clock experience? How many clocks do you think you’ve seen, ever?

          Most clocks I’ve seen recently (I can recall exactly 1) have seconds hands. Regardless though I’m not suggesting “most clocks” have seconds hands…I’m just making a quip about how traditional, analogue, clocks have seconds hands to deal with the exact problems noted.

          • Emmie@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            And yet in schools they don’t have seconds. Never had

            I still have ptsd thanks to that. Can you imagine? No seconds?

            This is pure torture that should be forbidden by Geneva convention. So uncivilised

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The specific time isn’t as important as how long it is until things are going down. You know the part of the clock the minute hand will be pointing at when it’s time to do shit then you got a handy little progress arc to check in on and instantly know when it’s time to do the things.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I read both kinds of clocks differently and have to sit and process to translate between them. A digital clock I read as “six twenty-five AM.” An analog clock I read as “almost half-past six.” I usually don’t bother reading an analog clock at greater resolutions than a quarter hour.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    OK let’s have a lesson for those who find this difficult. First, remember that little kids pick this up quickly and easily, so you can too!

    We all know there are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a day, right? and that the day is divided into the a.m. of 12 hours and the p.m. of 12 hours.

    So analog clocks show those 12 hours as the numbers 1-12 evenly spaced around the clock face. Now look a little closer and you see it’s also divided into 60 marks with a tick mark for each of the 60 seconds/minute or 60 minutes/hour. Hang on, we’re almost there!

    The little hand points to the HOUR number (1-12). If it’s in between two numbers, that means the time is in between those two hours.

    The big hand points to the MINUTE tick mark. Notice that the 1-12 numbers coincide with each 5th tick mark so it’s easy to count them. Just count by 5’s! So if the big hand is between the 3 and the 4, that means the minute of the hour is between 15 and 20, look at which tick mark for the exact minute.

    Now, can you figure out how the second hand works? Good! Kindergarten dismissed!

    /s

  • Sol 6 VI StatCmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Who cares. Analog audio, video, phones, all out the window. Next people will be complaining people don’t even know anything about vacuum tubes. Digital clocks are easier to read and make more fuckin sense. Leave the kids alone. 🙄🙄🙄

  • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It was the only way I could tell how much time is left, I didn’t have a phone till highschool. In school counting down the second till school was over was so crucial.