No fair, you cheated.

Unless you’re in my line of work. If I do it at the end of the week, there’s guaranteed to be an incident.

Can you guess what I do?

Exactly, bad PR.

Waste isn’t actually much of a problem - it’s just been portrayed as one.

I always tell passengers where the manual lever is, and where the break glass hammer is. What’s the point in having them if only 1 of you knows the location?

Well played

Funny how some poster got downvoted for this, yet you got upvoted for it in the same thread. People are fickle.

Funny how people think waste is why we don’t use nuclear power.

You noticed how we’re all fine breathing in poison and carcinogens? Still haven’t banned burning fossil fuels.

It’s a money problem and a PR problem

This comment made me learn. Thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scriptio_continua

Or for those that just want to read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scriptio_continua

Maybe I’m misreading your tone, but I’m not trying to argue with you - I’m genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I’m open!

My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what’s involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory.

We also can’t teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works.

Science shit?

I dont know…but I wouldn’t say that’s a good reason to doubt it, for example I don’t know how they proved black holes exist but they seem pretty confident.

That’s how they kill the germs…very clever really.

Isn’t smell just particulate matter hitting receptors not dissimilar to how taste receptors send taste signals to the brain? I thought science had this stuff nailed down now?

You sound about as self aware as the adults they’re referring to.

Thankfully there’s nothing particularly special about Elons DNA and so whatever they produce from it will be an especially sub-par human.

Elon, like Trump, are cut from the same cloth: family wealth.

We’re obviously both interpreting the thread differently and only the OP knows whether they were asking the UK resident for the UK term or whether the OP was asking the UK resident for more US terms.

The OP asked, in this thread, for the UK term that works. Your reply to that question led them to add another US term thinking that you were providing a UK term.

Then why are you replying in this thread about UK terms? Lol

I’ve never heard this term. We always called them the estate, because usually they were council estates.

You are correct. If the flow of traffic in lane 1 or 2 is faster than the flow of traffic in lane 2 or 3 then it is okay to pass. Intentionally changing lane temporarily to pass a car on the inside is illegal.

The other poster confused your point.

If someone in lane 3 is going 69 and overtaking someone then there’s no reason to pass them, and probably isn’t safe or legal given there is, by definition, a car on the inside lane already.