Still waiting on that CIA paycheck, man when CIA payroll dept finally pays me that back pay is gonna be sweet!

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can someone give me the rundown about why this is a thing? I’ve gotten called names and dismissed in political discussion because of the domain, but I’m literally only here because it’s what Boost switched to when the Reddit API pricing bullshit happened.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You mean why .ml are the way that they are? See this recap post: https://lemmy.world/post/29072279

      As far as why they shit on .world? Because it’s the biggest instance that generally won’t tolerate their crap as far as posting of their favored propaganda goes anyways (wish .world would just defed from them already like the rest of the triad)

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Being called a single issue voter for caring about Palestinian children at all and a tankie for caring about economic liberation certainly would make this meme seem accurate.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Your comment was a low effort strawman (and I suspect you to be little more than a liberal troll) for three reasons:

            1. Conflation of Socialism and state socialism
            2. False dichotomy of socialism and democracy
            3. Subtly hinting that only liberal democracy can bring freedom as opposed to workers democracy

            From your second comment you have effectively proven that you are deeply unwilling to learn about the liberation of the workers. You are either deeply uniformed and/or you simply do not want to be informed. If you have any intrest in genuenly understanding my economic views feel free to read Think It Over by the IWW (its a very short read).

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Tell me, did the Nordic countries reject democracy when they embraced socialism?

                This is just a simple question, I’m sure you are willing to give an answer to it.

              • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Tell me, whats so free about your Liberal Democracy? Congratulations you get to choose between two politicans but they’re both owned by the same corporations. You get free speech until it threatens capital or state. Lastly you enjoy the right to oppress people but only if you’re privileged. Right now we live in a dictatorship of capital, a system build on imperialism and today runs on neocolonialism.

                Yet you arent guaranteed shelter, you aren’t guaranteed food, you aren’t even guaranteed to see more than a sliver of the fruits of your labor. You own nothing, you have nothing, everything that you think you have is crumbling around you as the liberal system falls.

  • el_bhm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Remember how russia got completely surprised by Ukraine’s collectivism and national identity?

    Yeah, if one does actual psyops and mass propaganda at national level, you can present and see your enemy through a similar mindset (yes, goes for usa and china bs as well).

    The most hilarious thing was a circlejerk convincing dummies there is a grassroot movement between polish kids in being interested in russia, the language and communism.
    Bitch gtfo. Any kid who would get caught with this shit would get smacked in the head at light speed. Yes, there is such thing. But ran by russian troll farms. What was proven by journalists, ngos as well as eu intel agencies.

    Of course the most legitimate account is PolandIsAStateOf… Whoever is running that account does not use polish ever.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, for example, me an anarcho-communist who thinks western governments are generally terrible. But ALSO thinks that governments like Russia and China are absolutely terrible and committing different forms of genocide, am definitely on a CIA payroll right? That only makes sense?

  • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Umm first off, you’re an intern, you don’t get paid. Second, I sent you for coffee like 3 hours ago and you still haven’t dropped it off at my desk.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Liberalism is a conservative ideology, so yeah, it would make sense that the most liberal instance out there is opposed to communism. I wouldn’t call it a psyop though, instead I would say it’s Neo Reddit. Just a bunch of liberals all circlejerking each other over Wall Street and war crimes.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This hurt my brain. In my head liberalism is right of center, where as conservatism is center right, followed by fascism on the far right. I don’t know if this is accurate but, it’s my interpretation of the political spectrum.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m assuming you’re American? In any other country, the American Democratic party would be considered conservatives. If you compared them to the UK, for example, they share similar policies with the Tories.

        American politicians like AOC and Bernie are slightly left of center. There aren’t any real leftist parties in the US. Meanwhile, most Americans would consider them leftists, because from our perspective they are the most left.

        • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was speaking strictly to ideological politics, removed from electoral politics. The American democratic party is largely ideologically neo-liberal, which in my previous comment I mentioned to be right of center.

          It’s my opinion that elected/prospective representatives are going to obfuscate their true ideology (if they hold one) if it serves their interests. This often betrays the trust in their constituents, leading them to believe the party is left wing.

          • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            From what I know, liberal in other parts of the world often means market liberal, not social liberal

            • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ll have to look up what a social liberal means. If I’m not mistaken, upholding the institution of capital is universally a liberal value.

              That alone would make them some flavor of rightwing in my mind.

              • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                That might be, but as an example from Germany, the FDP are referred to as liberal, even though they are against pretty much everything that American liberals stand for.

                Their main focus is creating a free market and propagation of unfettered capitalism.

                From the Wikipedia page, it’s reads as the middle ground between socialist and market liberal ideas.

      • releaseTheTomatoes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As far as I’m aware, the terms “Liberal” and “Conservative” aren’t exactly mutually exclusive.

        “Conservative” originally referred to defending tradition and social order. “Liberal” emphasized individual rights, reform, and limiting state power. Though once opposing forces, the terms have evolved today, someone can be socially liberal but economically conservative, or vice versa. Their meanings often depend on context.

        • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree with this mostly. I just believe being economically conservative or economically liberal, as a consequence, buttresses the same economic mode of production. I view that mode of production to be inherently coercive/rightwing.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Meanwhile I had the opposite reaction. “Man, I really hope this leftist reddit diaspora is at least passingly familiar with some contemporary post-left theory from the last century and isn’t just tankie brainrot…”

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A anti

    Homie should take a break from pretending to read theory and read a book about grammar

  • ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had some mouth breathing chuds on Discord accuse me of being a CIA psyop because I didn’t want to play a game with EAC (a specific kind of kernel level anticheat) yes, being anti spyware makes me a spook, cmon guys are you even trying 🙄

  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not a psyop but I am definitely anti-communist. Communism is fuckin’ stupid. Capitalism is out of control for sure, but I damn sure prefer it to any form of communism that has ever existed on a nation-state level in the world. Signed, a lemmy dot world user.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Community property, community ownership of everything, and the kind of government that is required to enforce non-ownership of everything. Because in my experience when you let the community own something the dumbest bastards in town will just fuck it all up. Community ownership of everything only works when everybody is nice and considerate of others, but in the real world there are fucking idiots everywhere who don’t care about the external world and others at all.

        So for communism to work, you’d have to exile all of those idiots to somewhere else. Then you are Hitler 3.0 with mass deportations and camps all over again. There’s no good answer to the inherent problems.

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Personal property allowable isn’t it? I understood that to be distinct from private property. The UK has plenty of council run parks, the NHS etc which are publicly owned without too much trouble.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Part of the definition of communism includes community (government controlled) ownership of everything. You could not own a house or land and the government could tell you that “your” property must be given to someone else at any time.

            This would never work in the USA or really anywhere that values personal freedom. And therein lies the core issue with communism, as it destroys the freedom of individuals in sacrifice to the “greater good” of allegedly equal distribution of resources. In practice, like in China for example, the ranking members of the Party tend to get More Equal distribution of resources like having their own special gardens of organic produce that the common folks never have access to.

            IMO it could only work in small communities of like-minded people, like the hippies and others used to do last century. At the nation-state level it inherently leads to authoritarian oppression of freedom.

            • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              From what research I’ve done since your initial post you don’t appear to be correct concerning personal property by most interpretations.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes of course social programs to help those in need are good, and we should have more of them everywhere. Much of Europe has this all figured out and in place already without resorting to communist extremes.

            What we have currently in the USA are programs for food assistance for the needy, medical care through programs like Medicaid (in danger) and state/county operated Health Dept clinics where the poor can get medical care for free or income-based costs. So we are not without help entirely but there is a lot of room for improvement.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Karl Marx was influenced in his writings on communism by Lewis Henry Morgan, an American who had been studying (badly) the Haudenosaunee. Marx mentions Morgan and the Haudenosaunee as inspirations for his theories. No history of European communism is complete without mentioning indigenous communists, who actually succeeded.