I’ve used proton for a year or two now and it is fine. Great for use on my phone when I want to use public/airport wifi and it sort of kind of works with gluetun (the rotating port is annoying but it still is a forwarded port).

But I’ve increasingly been annoyed with Proton as a company and am looking to migrate my email/domain to fastmail in the very near future. I COULD continue to just pay for the vpn (60 USD a year is pretty reasonable) but also feel like this is a good opportunity to “shop around”

Checked the wiki and other FAQs (which all basically crib from said wiki) and they all basically boil down to proton or mullivad… except that mullivad apparently stopped allowing port forwarding which is a bit of an issue for any torrents and the like.

So are there any other good options?

Thanks

  • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I love Mullvad, but if you need P2P its not the best option. If you just need a VPN, though, its amazing. Today I just switched to AirVPN and am running it on Arch through Eddie. Have my qbittorrent set up to only allow connections through Eddie and just forwarded my first port. I’m very happy with it.

    I think the only downside is that I could get Mullvad for 5eur a month on a month by month basis. AirVPN is 7eur or 15eur for three months, so I have to lock into the three months to get the same price.

    • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Worth noting that Italy (location of airvpn) hates vpns and is constantly fucking around with them, to the point air doesn’t even actually operate in Italy to preserve users privacy. Right now, theres no immediate risk, but it’ is worth keeping an eye on the political situation in Italy regarding VPN laws

      • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I did read this somewhere before. I just have to take my chances at the moment. My other option was Windscribe, but unless you’re paying for a year+ their prices are astronomical.

        • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah I use airvpn myself, its just worth throwing that info out for full transparency/disclosure

  • Droolio@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Still using Private Internet Access (PIA).

    Honestly, dunno why they’ve fallen out of fashion due to the FUD about being owned by an unsavoury parent company, but the most important matter to me is if they keep logs, which they don’t. One of the few VPN companies tested on this, in court, and in a recent audit. Plus still extremely cheap (if you go for 3yr+3mo).

    Port forwarding works with with this docker NAS stack. Doesn’t use gluetun, but there’s a specialised docker-wireguard-pia container as part of the stack, with a script that handles port changes. Been flawless.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not a VPN, but you may also want to look into I2P.

    https://i2pd.website/

    https://proprivacy.com/privacy-service/guides/i2p-guide

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=FNp0TRDG0BQ

    Basically, a p2p protocol for the entire internet.

    Its considerably more complicated to set up than most modern VPNs, where nowaday’s its usually as simple as install an app with a GUI, verify some settings and you’re good to go, and i2p is also quite slow…

    … but its totally free, and you can torrent over it, and as far as I know, if you’ve set it up properly, it is basically undetectable by ISPs, due to how it uses ‘garlic’ routing: basically, a whole bunch of users net requests are encrypted, anonymized, and then smashed into a big packet… so an ISP would have to untangle all of that for every packet, and afaik, none of them have figured out how.

    I2P would obviously be horrible for watching streaming content though, snail speed.

  • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Mullvad, IVPN and Nym for clearnet browsing. PIA, AirVPN and Windscribe for torrenting. Windscribe and PIA are probably good for either but this is my classification, take it as you will

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I agree on this with the exception of PIA.

      • Marketing is BS like most VPN
      • Company is based in the USA
      • They do analytics
      • You cannot register “anonymously”

      It’s not the worst VPN you could choose but there is better options.

    • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I would not put Nym in the same category as Mullvad and IVPN. It is a new and immature product. I have not heard that they have passed any sort of audit, their claims about non-log policy have not been tested yet.

      Their infrastructure is decentralized only in name. In fact, they have the same problem as session, the cost of maintaining a server discourages decentralization so much that no one does that. As a result it nullifies any advantages their mixnet might offer, as chances are all your hops are between the servers of the same owner.

      • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yes, Nym is new. Their mixnet has a lot of similarities with TOR.

        What do you mean by “cost of maintaining a server”? I don’t think resource requirements are any different from TOR relays or exits.

        It is possible in theory but I assumed they weren’t lying when they said over 800 nodes exist in their network.

        Yeah maybe I should’ve put Nym as “of interest” rather than giving off the impression that it’s at the same level of reputation as Mullvad and IVPN

        • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          They do require to invest a certain amount of crypto to connect your node to blockchain. This in theory is done to prevent Sybil attacks.

            • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              TOR by design is vulnerable to Sybil attacks. In fact, there have been attempts to exploit this vulnerability “in the field”. It is not clear how successful they were. There are some measures taken to prevent such attacks, but none of them guarantee safety. I2p and other p2p networks also suffer from the same problem.

              In fact there is only one known way to mitigate Sybil (and alike) attacks. It is to expand the cost of operating in the network so much, that it would not be financially viable to perform it. There are two major way to achieve that: proof-of-work and proof-of-stake.

              PoW is what majority of cryptocurrencies do. To operate in the network you need to perform significant calculations. The more calculations you perform the “stronger” your position is. For that you have to invest huge amount of money in hardware and energy to “outperform” other actors. That is what mining basically is.

              PoS requires you instead to invest a crypto (or whatever, does not actually matter). The more crypto you invest “the bigger your ‘bank’ account is”, the “stronger” your position is as well. This is what nym and lokinet (technology behind session messenger) do.

  • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I’d say the proven good ones are Proton, Mullvad, and IVPN.

    Windscribe has really improved a lot and is worth considering. Still probably worth waiting for Freshscribe infrastructure before considering over the 3 I mentioned above.

    Nym and Obscura are up and comers worth looking at. Nym is a decentralized VPN and Obscura has partnered with Mullvad to offer a true double hop (ie one in where both hops are not owned by the same entity).

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you use it just as A VPN it could be fine ig.

        If I’m not mistaken Orbot passes traffic through the Tor network which will significantly reduce network speeds.

        Someone feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.

        • Kiuyn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes you are right. That is why I said it could be fine. I think most people will find it too slow. And also route all your phone traffic through tor isn’t a great idea neither because most services block Tor IP anyway.

  • zedgeist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Just throwing in another voice for PIA. Their corporate owners may be questionable, but I’ve been with them since before they sold out and have never heard a peep from my ISP for seeding terabytes of torrents. They don’t keep logs, and they are audited to prove it regularly.

    EDIT: They also have port forwarding, but not for every exit server.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      PIA is such a weird one. They’re massive and know what they’re doing but ownership and jurisdiction have always been questionable. I have long suspected they cooperate with GHCQ but only on legitimate national security cases not piracy.

  • land@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If you mainly do torrenting, AirVPN is a good option. I have recently moved away from ProtonVPN; it’s too expensive.

  • liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m with Azire, they have port forwarding and 10 gig servers. Note they were bought recently by malwarebytes, so it is possible things will change in the future. For the time being, things have been great. I moved from OVPN after myself and others started experiencing persistant failures.

    I’ve been meaning to try out CryptoStorm. If anyone has experience with them please share.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Cryptostorm. Supports port forwarding, and you can buy access tokens through third parties using crypto. You do not register an account or provide them with any information to use the service, other than the token.

    But honestly, Proton is the best route to go.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      ProtonVPN has been a known data miner for years now. Cryptostorm’s admins do know what they’re doing. If you want an audit see mullvad or ipredator

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve used AirVPN for this exact setup and it works great. The port forwarding is static and doesn’t change once setup. I switched to proton because it was convenient, I was already paying for ProtonMail et all, so I dropped the extra VPN subscription when it renewed.

  • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If you want port forwarding the choice is between AirVPN, ProtonVPN and Njalla. Iirc PIA also supports port forwarding, but their ownerships reputation is no good.

    Mullvad, IVPN and many other services don’t support port forwarding.

    • dzsimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Do you have any experience with Njalla? This would be my first time purchasing a VPN and I couldn’t imagine a better provider on paper.

      I just don’t know anything practical about it besides it’s founded by a member of the swedish pirate party.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve never used them but I heard about them in the context of private DNS and VPS hosting. E.g. they act as a middleman to shield domain the shield the client from authorities (at least to some extent — they still have to follow the laws).

        Given their focus on privacy I’d trust them for torrenting at least as much as the other options. As a first VPN I’d say it’s great because of their flat 5€/m price. A few years ago I used Mullvad for that purpose — until they removed port forwarding.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Given there’re alternatives I’d rather choose an independent service instead.

        But that’s a personal decision which is why I mentioned PIA with the disclaimer, instead of ignoring them.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I get what you’re saying and I use proton despite the kerfuffle with their CEO, but where privacy is concerned yes I do care about the reputation of the company to an extent. To not care about that all would be very silly. Too much trust involved.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I2P is not an option because I’m using a VPN for regular internet traffic. As much as I like the idea of I2P, there’s just no I2P torrent sites with the selection of content I want.

            Tor is not an option choice for torrents.

              • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                That’s fine. It completely depends on your threat model and your preferences. To this date I haven’t heard anything negative about PIA except their owners, so it’s fair to trust them. I just want to point out that you can have both with other providers.

                Generating a random account number is a unique and great feature of Mullvad.
                But other providers allow for the same privacy. E.g. AirVPN does not require a valid email address. Any random string works for all required fields (email, username, password). Payment via Monero is available too. Njalla does require a valid email address (it sends a confirmation mail), but any tempmail provider works (which you could access through Tor). They also accept Monero.

                • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Impressive, I didn’t know AirVPN accepted XMR. That greatly influences my decision about them vs PIA and others. I wanted a VPN which I could pay for anonymously and could torrent with (open ports)