• Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah.

    For example, does Microsoft deserve my money for how much of a dumping they’ve taken onto Windows since Windows 8? No, they don’t.

    Because if I did give Microsoft my money, I’m REWARDING them for their half-assery.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Believe it or not, I’ve met people like this. I know a guy who was worried about showing a movie to our Meetup group.

      Not because he was afraid of getting caught. He thought it might be unethical.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    There nothing to jusfity.

    I pirate because I want to see the world burn, among other things.

    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I do it because it’s easy and it’s free but if it was difficult i’d probably still do it.

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        If needed, I’d pay for debrid/vpn much more than I’d pay for some ‘legit’ streaming service, just out of spite.

  • What’s the justification for not allowing me to make a copy? Those who decry piracy call it theft, but it’s not theft since they aren’t losing anything. Not a physical product they could run out of, nor a potential sale as has been shown time and time again; people who pirate a thing generally wouldn’t have purchased the thing anyway.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago
    1. It’s morally good when people access information, culture, and entertainment.
    2. It’s morally good when the author of a work gets rewarded by their work.

    Piracy is morally justified when 1 is a more pressing matter than 2. As such, it’s justified in situations like this:

    • If, in the absence of piracy, the pirate would still not pay for the goods - because #2 is set up to zero (the author of the work is not rewarded anyway).
    • If it’s impossible to obtain the goods without piracy. For example, abandonware.
    • If the author of the work would get breadcrumbs of the money used to access legally the goods, and the pirate compensates the author directly (e.g. donation).
    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      in journalism they teach you to only do headlines with a question if the answer is no, otherwise just make it say “piracy is justified”.

      obviously this guy is a musician and not a journalist, and as such, actually thinking about things he makes….
      (i like his other videos too)

      • stringere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s what I was referring to. Thank you for elucidating it, though, for others that may not have known.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I am pro-piracy and I actually think that’s clearly a worse question.

      Did you take something that was intended to be sold or only given with explicit permission without permission or payment? Yes? Piracy. To be clear this is completely separate from the ethical questions that surround that, but defining piracy is (generally. GENERALLY, for emphasis) not that difficult.

  • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    if they put in DRM that makes the plugins 10x as big (looking at you, Acustica. I don’t even use their plugins because of that), or they make the legit version have some bullshit always-online “all-in-one” software (i.e Native Access) which in turn makes the software a bit of a faff to get working in Linux (to install legit libraries for legit kontakt, native access stores those libraries as .iso files and does some virtual drive fuckery a la DAMEONTools), then yes, if the pirated version is quicker to set up and run (and install libraries for), it is justified imo.

    Also i hate theaters and streaming services. I’d rather watch whatever movie I think is cool in the comfort of my PC rather than having to drive to the theater (if it’s even on there in the first place), or paying for 9000 streaming services now and only watch like a couple of things. The wait for a good webrip (even more so for a BluRay) is worth it.

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I bought a quite expensive piece of animation software (that cost over $1000) to use professionally. The specific term it was sold to me under was a “perpetual license.” I took this to mean “never ending”, which is the dictionary definition of the word “perpetual.” You can probably guess where this is going.

    A few years later, in the middle of a professional project, it stopped working. I contacted support, and was told that they changed the way they were doing licenses so I’d have to buy a new one (at almost double the price) or eat shit. I’m paraphrasing, but that was the gist of it.

    So yeah, if you’re thinking of buying a Toon Boom Harmony perpetual license, maybe save yourself a lot of money and hassle and just pirate it instead. Or tell them to get fucked and use their direct competitor. I have done both.