oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

  • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like that the name of the platform has been written over.

    “This is only happening locally here at <place in the internet> and not at <every other place in the internet>”. And that’s happening for every place in the internet.

    Marvellous

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    So you’re saying Twitter is better?

    /jk

    Sure, it happens here, but I feel the toxicity on Lemmy is far less then on Reddit or other platforms, and with toxicity I mean including people assuming you’re saying something else because they are triggered somehow. But it’s very hard not to stumble upon people like that. Trolls rule the universe, they are everywhere.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It may be less toxic, but that’s only if you share the sentiments many lemmy users share. The echo chamber is louder here

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    On the other hand, a failure to make assumptions about what someone is saying leads to people being able either to willfully misrepresent their positions (“Oh, I don’t hate waffles, I just bring up how the world would be better without waffles in every conversation, no matter how tangential!”) or unintentionally fail to see the necessary implications of their statements (“I’m not saying waffles are better, I’m just saying pancakes are worse!”)

    All language has some ambiguity, which necessitates assumption in communication.

  • oshu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just ignore and block of it contonues. I got no time for people who are responding to the voices in their head instead of what I’m actually writing.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it can be important to see the intent behind words and ask for clarifications. Oftentimes people are not direct about their opinions.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      yuh, totally! i even experienced an example of your counterexample recently https://lemmy.cafe/post/10752342/8934173

      egg on my face, i guess i worded a meme so badly it gave 180 degrees the opposite impression (to some). was super thankful to this user for being transparent and helping me identify what part to edit.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      i can’t speak to the frequency but the tone is definitely different when it happens here compared to on reddit, probably influenced by the demographic and field of interest differences. the ml roots of the place really have echoed throughout the tone of the space, so most of the arguments have a really cynical, high alert, almost superstitious affect to them that i never really encountered on reddit. (some random account i thought i was cool with is trying to like psychoanalyze my recent posts to find my true intentions? i gave up on that convo)

      your mileage may vary, of course!

  • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m convinced that most people don’t read anything before sharing their opinion. An opinion with zero relevance or weight is absolutely useless.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh sorry I was making a reference to Xavier: Renegade Angel, where Xavier somehow misinterprets the phrase “Checkmate” to be a proposition for sex, from a clone of himself. (One of those… “Did I watch this at 3am one night or was that a fever dream?” shows)

  • JayDee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    TBF, I understand this annoying kind of ‘reading into it’. at the same time, if someone starts dropping dogwhistles or starts dancing around something in a convo, i am definitely gonna read into that shit.

    • :3 3: :3 3: :3 3: :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is anywhere, period. You can do that with letters, you can do that with speeches, or in casual conversations.

      And you’re not always wrong about it either.

      If you’ve played Disco Elysium, “Welcome to Revachol”. If you haven’t, play it. It’s an amazing game

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I see more Motte-and-bailey fallacy.

    I see less “I like pancakes” and more “I think pancakes are superior to waffles” from the first commenter.

    Then the second commenter responds, “So you hate waffles?”

    Then the first commenter retreats to “No, I just like pancakes. Why are you assuming what I’m saying? Don’t you understand I’m being nuanced?”

    Also, nuance is one of the more recent words to have a new usage like literally, which can now mean figuratively. When people say their argument is nuanced they mean it is good or correct. It reminds me of the use objective to describe a person to pretend they don’t have biases to incorrectly validate their arguments.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      me: lot of pancakes out there

      you: actually i see more waffles

      (with peace and love haha you make excellent points i just couldn’t resist)