While it’s very unlikely that someone has a definitive answer, this question popped into my head after the assassination of the UHC CEO and it’s been bothering me that I can’t shake off this feeling that more is likely to happen (maybe not in higher frequency but potential).

Usually I could provide counter-arguments to myself in a realism/(should I buy apples or oranges comparison) kind-of sense but this one I feel more unsure about.

I wish I had more diverse exp in systems analysis as these kinds of questions that linger in my head really irritates my OCD brain as I just want to know what’s the most likely answer.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Nah, we’re going to see more anon violent terrorists, some of them might even do a little good, but for the most part it’s not going to change a single thing about our system of laws or how the majority of people navigate that system.

    White supremacists groups have been kidnapping, holding government buildings hostage, and threatening politicians for decades and they don’t get their way, don’t expect it to be any different from any other groups or individuals.

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Aren’t we primarily ok with this guy being assassinated because he was the face of a terrible company not because he was CEO in general? If someone from middle management or even low level worker who personally denied this guy′s insurance claim would have been assasinated, would we suddenly feel sorry?

    Also remember that people like surgeons or dentists also can be considered ″filthy rich″ by your average Joe standards.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      We wouldn’t feel sorry because we wouldn’t know it happened, the only reason anyone is talking about this is because the guy was rich.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      “If someone from middle management or even low level worker who personally denied this guy′s insurance claim would have been assasinated, would we suddenly feel sorry?”

      Absolutely! Who is making the decisions that lead to a mass loss of life? Not a random worker at the company.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Absolutely! Who is making the decisions that lead to a mass loss of life? Not a random worker at the company.

        I would argue anyone participating in the company, even someone washing the floors at night is helping to perpetuate it. Definitely not to the degree of the CEO, but every single worker there is helping to sustain the system.

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Not just CEO. I would say he might have known even less of procedures in detail than middle management. You wouldn’t pardon all Nazis just because Hitler was on top, would you? If what you do willingly is non-ethical even if you don’t call the shots, you are just as bad.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Well yeah there is a gradient of culpability but it roughly follows the gradient of power and compensation, which is an exponential curve with the lion’s share of the area under the curve contained within the very very top.

          If you want to get technical about it, if the average CEO earns 300 times the average (not the lowest) pay of employees at the company than sure, the average employee has culpability but it is 1/300th or less of the culpability of the people truly at the top and that is likely a conservative estimate of gulf between those two values.

          Obviously one doesn’t somehow nullify the other but the structure of culpability here has to be taken into account in order to make an honest analysis.

    • svtdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      There is a gulf between people who are paid well for their valuable labor (even into the millions of dollars) and the capital class who primarily profit on the labor of others.

      Rent seeking is a big driver of “eat the rich”.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    As John F Kennedy said “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable”

    Either we fix this peacefully through the democratic process, or people are gonna riot.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      John F Kennedy said that at a time when the majority of Americans weren’t overweight, undereducated, overworked, utterly dependant on their cars (which need the roads maintained by the government to work), and addicted to their phones. I don’t think Americans have the physical or mental capability to wage an effective protest like what happened in the 20th century.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Give it a decade and people might become a lot leaner and a lot stronger though, I hope. Admittedly I don’t have a lot of faith in my compatriots but it could happen.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Luckily for us we’ve set things in motion to destroy most of the benefits that allowed us to live such a sheltered existence, so it doesn’t look like most of us are going to have much of a choice about it. This isn’t self sabotage, it’s a training montage.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Considering the US (and most modern militaries) struggle against insurgencies and irregular militia (Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam) there’s no reason to doubt the american public.

        Much of the Vietcong were uneducated, underfed, impoverished rural farmers but they were a devastating force to GIs.

    • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable”

      I’m a fan of this belief because it provides hope in that with the increase of peace and harmony, humanity could course-correct towards a realized utopia.

      The publicized hope of increased violence is a scary indicator that we’re approaching closer to commonly associated fiction-based dystopias🫠

      • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The publicized hope of increased violence is a scary indicator that we’re approaching closer to commonly associated fiction-based dystopias🫠

        Honestly, I realized a few months ago that we’re already way into dystopia territory. It clicked for me when I read a news story explaining how there are people in Los Angeles that make it their business to rent old, beat up vans and RVs parked on the street for homeless people to live in, for several hundreds of dollars a month. I did a search and found another article about it, linked below. How much more dystopic can things get? In fact, any of the massive homeless encampments we’ve been seeing are already plenty dystopic.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Billionaires: yeahhh I’m just going to buy all the media, all the politicians, and make sure enough of my guys win that they stop any legislation that would cost me anything. Nothing could ever go wrong with effectively taking away people’s choices right?

      I’m thinking all we have left is roit. We’ve already lost the democratic process through propaganda outlets and bought and paid for candidates a while ago. There is no party for the working class. There is a party that likes to talk big, but when push comes to shove they don’t do shit and have their chosen “enemy of the term” to pop up and take the fall to stop anything from passing.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          as much as i hate the “both sides are the same” argument when it comes to actual individual politicians, their actions, and policies. this is the one thing that the vast majority of them do have in common. taking billionaire money and letting it affect their decisions.

          we were fucked as soon as citizens United passed. that was probably the inflection point that made violent revolution inevitable. when political bribes became legal.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Probably not, but it’s nice to see that the assassination of just one executive, and the widespread support and praise the assassin has received, has other parasites terrified. My optimistic side says that maybe this will get the attention of lawmakers. My realistic side foresees private militias funded by megacorporations, but without rockerboy Keanu Reeves leading the resistance against them.

  • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    The rich have exceptional resources to protect themselves. Money is just another form of power.

    For instance, even in a doomsday scenario (for them) of the French Revolution, the rich will have personal security guards. These people will be paid very well (relative to the general population), which will keep them loyal enough. They will eat at secure restaurants (similar deal), and enjoy activities in secure locations.

    Beyond that, you already see the rich buying private islands (Larry Ellison) and preparing for an uprising (Peter Thiel).

    But if you let your imagination run wild, they can even distort the blame, and set up patsies. Owning the media and controlling the narrative (propaganda) is highly effective and already happening in earnest. Plenty of blame is being shifted to immigrants and (because it works, somehow) LGBT+ groups.

    I would even say the UHC CEO is himself a fall guy. The buck doesn’t stop at the CEO. There is a step above him. The board of directors is responsible, and they will replace him with another just like him. They are the ones that ultimately choose the direction.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      For instance, even in a doomsday scenario (for them) of the French Revolution, the rich will have personal security guards. These people will be paid very well (relative to the general population), which will keep them loyal enough. They will eat at secure restaurants (similar deal), and enjoy activities in secure locations.

      In a collapse scenario, their money will be worthless.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I don’t think the guy making 12 million dollars a year off the suffering of the poor counts as a fall guy.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        He’s a willing participant, for sure. But the board and shareholders make even more than that.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s hard to defend yourself from guns. Considering Trump, with the resources, intelligence and defense of the entire state still had 2 close calls with assassinations being an example of this.

      The second time was in a secure, exclusive, golf resort.

      Rifles can reliably hit a target within 200 meters in a single shot with practice. They maintain an effective range from 500 to even 800 meters.

      Unless CEOs are okay with living and working in extreme solitude and isolation, there will always remain the possibility of assassination.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s mostly irrelevant to your point, but I’m pretty sure the second one at his golf course was an unrelated shooting where someone else got shot. I guess it could be a cover story where they shot the attacker and didn’t want to make it seem like a trend for the media, but I don’t think we have any confirmation that the was indeed a second attempt

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        200 yards is nothing for a rifle, I shoot at 500 yards on my range for fun. There are schools and ranges for 1mile shots which you can do in a few days learning from long range shooters.

        A $1k AR10 or even a 700 will do 750 without breaking the bank.

        Small arms are why we have lost basically every war the USA has been in since Vietnam. It’s basically impossible to stop gorilla warfare.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    No… Lemmy is, but Lemmy is not indicative of society at large, hell, the Internet is not indicative of society at large.

    Look at the last US election, if we were going to Eat the Rich would we have elected a putative billionaire candidate backed by Elon Musk?

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      That’s what fake news is trying to say…

      Also, many people on here stated from the start kamala and her DNC komissars are incompetent imbiciles for which they promptly banned from politics and news subs.

      So just because mods silence comments sense reasoning, doesn’t mean that it ain’t out there.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Plenty of comments in Politics about how dumb the Democratic campaign was, the bans were for calling them perpetrators of a genocide, which is false.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Love your continued moderation of your communities into an echo chamber by removing opinions that $ ~> murder could ever be considered perpetration of murder.

          Don’t get me wrong you are free to disagree, but censorship of the opposing position is so toothlessly lame. Glad people are noticing how ineffectual and cringe your moderation practices are.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              “fringe elements gonna fringe” says the mod who gets pummeled with downvotes every time this happens

              tell me more about that “fringe” in light of that fat ratio 💪💪😎🦅

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I mean, kind of. Conservatives don’t view Donald Trump and Elon Musk as the wealthy elite that they are. They view them as “political outsiders”. So yeah, people want change from the status quo, because the status quo is broken for so many.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I sure hope so with how difficult the rich are making it to just fucking get by in this world. Just having more wealth and power than anyone in the history of mankind isn’t enough for them; they have to make sure everyone else has nothing.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      they have to make sure everyone else has nothing.

      It ain’t about them having most, it is about us having nothing.

      Never forget!

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t think we’re headed towards that society. This was one incident. We’ve lived with the billionaire boot on our necks for decades and decades, I think people have become complacent if anything and the vast majority of us go to tictok or places like Lemmy to vent and then never actually do anything about it. We vote, the billionaire class candidate wins, and nothing ever changes. We sigh, vent, and go back to work.

    I wouldn’t take this one incident to mean anything larger.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    There are plenty of alternatives to eat the rich.

    UBI does not make the rich any poorer. It just decentralizes power so that all can survive and eliminates crime.

    While our electoral politics is divided between either “pro business” or “hamas supporting communist radical left”, it could seem reasonable to constrain oligarchy and Israel first rule while still being pro economic growth and prosperity. This requires an “eat the media stooges” who refuse to tell the difference along with a forceful message that the DNC doesn’t support.

    Understanding that DNC are worthless pig fuckers meant to fundraise and not empower ordinary people is step 1 to progress.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    No its just one event. The first time I’ve seen this on Lemmy and I can’t blame people for not being sad about it.

    Anything else would be Stockholm syndrome.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Short answer: no.

    One CEO getting shot is not going to change much. The American public’s attention span is two weeks, if that. Another CEO in the endless line of corporate douchebags will take the spot of the murdered one and so on. All the lousy crap that led to our fucking useless health care system is still in place: CEOs with no heart/conscience, health industry lobbyists, spineless politicians for sale to the highest bidder.

    For sure, this was an exceptional event, but it’s not going to lead to any lasting change. Disagree with me? Post your prediction for what will change one year from now and let’s see what happens. My guess is NOTHING.

    • reddithalation@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      in a year from now, ceo’s will probably have a bit more private security and do less walking around in cities at 6 in the morning alone. I agree with you on the rest though

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Go price out the cost of 24/7 coverage for an individual and then think about the need to restrict your life to places that can be easily secured. These CEOs will be jumpy for a few weeks and then life will go on. I predict this is not going to be a trend. We aren’t going to see 10+ CEOs shot a year. If I am wrong about that rate, then the rest of what I said would no longer be true. I believe this will be an isolated incident.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    It will inspire copycats for sure. If the guy is never caught, then a lot of corporate management will be extremely nervous. They’ll just hire extra security for themselves. There will probably be a mass shooting taking out some innocent people.