Trump has stated he will cut American aid to Ukraine, which makes a majority of total aid. Recently Zelensky stated that if Ukraine’s only hope for sovereignty is its own nuclear arsenal, they will build it.

  • Oaksey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they get used it is obviously really going to be a bad time for all but one thing in their favour is that the prevailing wind goes from west to east.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yep.

    The US won’t be there for them anymore once trump takes the reins.

    Ukraine, and potentially anyone in NATO as well, will have to fend for themselves.

  • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It will surely help significantly preventing a tactical nuclear strike from russia, though it won’t end the war. It is an absolute last resort trigger. Ukraine will be annihilated after they use it (Russia has way more nuklear weapons).

    So somewhat good for them and OK to do so, though no solution and no substitution for western military aid.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The reluctance to authorize long range missile strikes into Russia is based on the fear of nuclear strikes on the US/authorizers. The war was always meant to keep oil prices high and trickle through weapon sales until the last Ukrainian.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ukraine needs to go away. They’re just as corrupt, if not more so, than Russia. The last thing they need is a nuke.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s really no question that any nation that wants actual security should have a nuclear weapon. It’s one of the only things that keeps you safe. This has been proven time and time again. Treaties are all just paper that can be ripped up at a moment’s notice and disregarded as is needed. Nuclear weapons are the only thing that actually protects sovereignty.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I don’t think it would serve any purpose unless they plan to use it, in which case no they should not. They’re going to have enough on their hands just keeping the orcs at bay until somebody takes out Putin.

    • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      To me this is the same philosophy adopted by Israel when they kill Hamas leaders. This isn’t chess, folks. Killing the king does not end the game.

      Name one time since Hitler that the death of a world leader has resulted in the end of an armed international conflict.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    wow Putin’s bitch stopping aid to Ukraine? never could’ve seen this coming.

    no kidding though, it took a while but Russia finally did it. they are the superpower now. good news, Europe!

  • Sadly, they don’t have enough time to build a defense. Trump is going to put them out for slaughter.

    Numerous other entities are at high risk in the immediate future, eg: Palestinians, Taiwan, Japanese islands… etc.

    Trump and Repugnants are not just the end of the U.S., but, also the World as we know it.

    I wish y’all the best and I apologize for the ensuing insanity.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Obviously. Instead of building one themselves though, they should probably buy it from France or the UK, or team up with Germany/Japan/South Korea on a joint program. Since their future looks unreliable too.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think they have much of a choice at this point. And yes, I’d support it. They clearly should’ve never agreed to the Budapest Memorandum with its half hearted security guarantees.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Idk how easy it easy to just build a nuke… I feel like the long range missile is the hard part, right? The actual nuclear part isn’t quite so complex. Maybe I’m wrong.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        He said they could make a bomb in a couple weeks if needed. No specifics on delivery or quality.

        Edit: sounds like kyiv is denying the claim made by some insider. So guess this isn’t likely true.

      • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        They have a lot of the Soviet weapons design bureaus. Not sure how many of the original designers are still around. The tricky bit will be refining enough uranium or plutonium in a war zone.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you are missing something important. Oh yeah, they gave their nuclear arms back to Russia for peace. Who would have thought their brothers and sisters would betray them, after all they are practically the same people.

      This is what makes the whole thing just fucking crazy. It would be like if Puerto Rico voted to be an independent nation and signed a peace treaty with the US. Then less then a couple decades goes by and the US starts attacking them when there are more Puerto Rican’s in the US than in Puerto Rico. It does not make any sense.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I thought politics was banned

      I thought politics were banned?

      If you’re going to be the grammar police, at least take the fucking job seriously. Fascist.

      • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Way to show you have no understanding of the English language there buddy.

        In English, “politics” is usually treated as a singular noun even though it ends in “s” since there is no singular ‘politic’. We use singular verbs with it, so “politics was banned” is standard.

        ‘Politics’ is different from plurale tantum nouns that are plural by default because they have two parts in one e.g scissors, glasses, pants, etc. This is why we say “Politics is interesting” rather than “Politics are interesting”.

        So do some research before you try to correct the fucking police of grammar idiot.

    • hibsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      US politics is temporarily not allowed as a topic. This question appears to be about Ukrainian nuclear defense capabilities, which would not qualify as US politics.