You will go straight to jail 😡😡😡

  • attero@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You would never use DuckDuckGo as your default search engine and then type !archiveis in front of your urlbar visiting a news site.

  • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Firefox has a button that shows up in the url that kind of turns the webpage into an e-book-esque view that pops up for most articles (especially Pay Wall)

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    we all need to consider, it costs money to fund quality journalism. we have to be aware of the many forces working against basic silly journalism, like what’s happening at the school board.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Doesn’t NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn’t work anymore last I checked.

    • Polysics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Brave browser has a filter to bypass paywalls. Works on desktop and mobile versions. Definitely works on NYT as I just read something there today. And of course has built in adblock. You can also add additional filters and adblock lists.

      Bonus: print to PDF in Brave to share an article with someone else. It retains all the graphics relevant to the article and cuts all the junk and ads out too.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah the article stub doesn’t link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don’t have a session.

      It’s incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

      In this very particular situation I’m glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

      I don’t particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don’t make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

      • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

      • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall.

        Sure, but the easily-bypassed js method makes sure it’s still crawlable by search engines, which is a trade well worth making where I work. Doesn’t matter as much for porn sites since the title and description aren’t the content most people are there for, so you can expose them on the paywall page.

    • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, unfortunately 12ft.io didn’t keep up with the paywall arms race. It’s too bad because it was one of those things that a lot of people knew about, many of whom may now just give up when it doesn’t work even though there are other options out there.

      As one example, there’s now also the 13ft ladder: https://github.com/wasi-master/13ft It’s like 12ft but self hosted. Sounds really good but I can’t vouch for it yet.

      I mostly would just archive a paywallrd page with archive.is (aka archive.today, archive.ph, etc.) and that worked great and also helped take traffic away from asshole sites that paywall content. Unfortunately, archive started requiring a cloud flare captcha when archiving a page. This is a deal breaker for me since captcha totally deanonymizes you and is used for tracking purposes and even to train AI. So it defeats a good chunk of the purpose of using an archive site.

      Still, there’s a good chance that someone else already archived the page you want to see, so putting the url in archive.is search can be enough to bypass the paywall.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Thank you for the great advice. We should share this to a maximum of people. We don’t want people to get in trouble for violating copyright especially when done accidentally.