For me “How long could I get away with driving like an ABSOLUTE ASSHOLE all the time before I lost my licence or had an accident.” Speed limits, red lights, stop signs… forget them all. Every day I have to drive sensibly and obey the law because without my licence I dont have a job, and every day I see at least one person driving like an absolute moron and I wonder…

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d want to know how many people would continue eating meat if they had to kill the animal themselves after getting trained how to do it. Or as an alternative instead of doing the killing yourself being physically present while someone else does it for you and you have to watch, smell, and hear them prepare it for you.

    Is it really unethical though?

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It may not be possible, but I want to gradually replace a person’s brain piece-by-piece with the same areas from other brains and see if they retain their sense of self when none of the original brain remains.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We can satisfy this curiosity with a fair amount of scientific evidence.

      Of course, most regions of the brain are so densely and variably interconnected that the technical difficulty of “replacing parts” precedes the ethical consideration by many, many years. But we do have a great deal of evidence for how our subjective sense of self is affected by “losing/removing parts” of the brain. Patients are often unaware of change unless evidence for it is overwhelming, and even then are adept at healing/reconciling instinctively. It appears that this is just something brains have evolved to do.

      So while the technology (and sheer artistry) required to match and “stitch” these networks is quite staggering, basically magic, it is theoretically possible that a patient could have every part replaced without recognizing any continuity errors in the chimeric stages, until one day they wake up as a completely different person.

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How would you know if your sense of self is changing? Surely you always feel like yourself else you wouldn’t be you…?

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It would also require centuries, so it’s not as possible, but breeding people for very specific traits and features. Whether appearance, physical strength, overall intelligence, specifically being great in mathematics, great smell, great sight.

    Basically, control the evolution by favoring very specific features and outright disallowing others (like hereditary diseases/disorders) that would be unacceptable in the mix.

    Since this requires a lot of time which I’d somehow theoretically have (I know, this wasn’t in the post, but anyway…), I’d want to try yet another thing. Breeding at the most late age possible, then continuing with that and extending it. Perhaps it would lead to increased lifespan, or at least lesser effects of aging in the far far offsprings. At least physically. These experiments don’t exactly favor mental health of the subjects.

    • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We already did this unintentionally during our natural evolution. All we really got out of it were a group of humans who can run slightly faster on average, and a group of humans who can drink milk as adults without shitting themselves.

      I imagine the timeframe to get any noticable results would be in the thousands of years, even with deliberate selection for specific genes.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How many clowns can you fit inside an unmodified VW Bug if survivability is no longer a concern.

  • konalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Raise a kid in a sensory deprivation chamber, with one exception: a monitor that only shows gen alpha brainrot videos. When they’re like 14 drop them off in a populated area and see what happens

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Realistically would just end up a developmentally stunted invalid. There was an example from some book, I don’t remember which, where there was a SE Asian woman who lived with her family and had a baby.

      The family was ashamed, so they forced the girl to keep the baby by itself in the attic. She would go to work most of the day, and come back to take care of it when home. That was the total extent of interaction and stimulation the baby got. It ended up being severely stunted and never learned to talk.

      Essentially young children need human interaction which includes warmth and constant validation, caring for, etc

      If you interrupt that in any way, you end up with a feral child who is permanently stunted.

  • Menschlicher_Fehler@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    How far can you strip down the human body until it can’t survive anymore. Assisted feeding and breathing is okay. Adjustable room temperature too.

    Arms, Legs? Gone. Can we get rid of the skin? Probably, if the room is the right temperature? Bones? Most of them aren’t needed, are they? Some organs surely can go too.

    Basically, what is the bare minimum needed so the body and the mind still more or less work.

    • BlueKey@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yo, same what I was gonna to comment.

      It would be fascinating to see if we could archive a “brain in a jar” by this.
      Even more when considering that a big bunch of non-brain neurons are in the belly-area. So would it affect how we think?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So, firstly, may I suggest you check youtube for one of the now many ‘Adventures of Torso’ type videos done in Kenshi.

      But as far as keeping a ‘minimum viable’ human actually alive?

      You could remove limbs, but you would still have to have a method for them to eat and urinate and deficate.

      You… almost certainly could not remove all skin and keep someone alive for very long.

      For starters, they’d bleed to death. Secondly, the pain of existing without skin would probably literally kill them or drive them to try to kill themselves. Thirdly: Skin prevents infections, you’d have to keep them in basically a totally hermetically sealed room or container.

      Bones? A de-boned human?

      Well there’s almost certainly not a way to remove all of your spinal bones and skull without causing death or immensely serious paralysis and/or brain damage.

      Sure you could remain alive without all your limbs if you have caretakers, you can survive without your lower jaw as well… You can maybe? survive with the loss of a certain high percentage of your ribcage, but probably not with the entirety of it and your sternum removed.

      Organs? Well, brain, heart and liver are almost certainly mandatory.

      Though you can remove portions of your liver and it can still function and regrow to some extent…

      …and portions of your brain… though you’ll lose cognitive abilities, memories and basically become braindead but still technically alive at some point.

      Assuming we are just removing things and maybe hooking you up to various kinds if life support tubes and not replacing organs with some kind of mechanical or genetically engineered equivalent:

      I think you can survive without any kidneys if you are constantly on dialysis, but its far better to have at least one.

      Similarly: Lungs, you need at least one.

      You can have your stomach and intestines and bladder partially removed or reshaped, but not entirely.

      You can survive without eyes… and a gallbladder and a thymus and a spleen and an appendix and your tonsils… and your adenoids, and your sex organs, but you’re gonna need a great deal of monitoring and bloodwork and hormone balancing and what not.

          • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Landmine has taken my sight, taken my speech, taken my hearing…”

            I guess someone forgot to tell Metallica when they were writing the song that it wasn’t about a landmine.

            And I guess someone previously forgot to tell Dalton Trumbo when he wrote ~Johnny Got His Gun~ that it wasn’t an anti-war novel.

            And then they forgot to tell him again thirty-two years later when he directed the movie adaptation, Johnny Got His Gun.

            And then, worst of all, they forgot to tell the directors of the music video that “One” was anti-war and Johnny Got His Gun was about a landmine and that using scenes from the film in the music video wouldn’t be thematically appropriate.

            Damn, there were a lot of missteps! Good thing you set it all straight!

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey! Somebody figured out the plot of the seminal sci-fi novel, “Don’t create the torment Nexus”!

    • Asphalt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      For this you don’t need a human, Can start with monkeys.

      Disclaimer: I don’t want this experiment to happen.

  • stelelor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Cyborg-like implants. I want titanium joints and UV vision and magnetic field sensors and charging my phone by laying it on my belly. Uncap each finger to reveal a small tool: screwdriver, USB key, cutting blade, etc.

    Note that none of that includes or requires a constant connection to a network/internet. I want to augment my interactions with the real world, not replace them with a virtual world.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Gorillas on steroids. How bulky can these magnificent already bulky beasts get?

    • Delphia@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, I like this one.

      Mind you Ive seen a cranky Silverback at the zoo, one with an extra gram of test and tren a day would be utterly fucking terrifying, also the roadrage would be something to behold… dibs not being the poor fucker giving it its shots.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Human genetic engineering. I’m sure governments are already doing this, because the technology is already here.

    You could create super soldiers or very intelligent people. You could then copy them in cloning vats and have an army of people you could shape and mold to your will.

    Could experiment with all sorts of stuff. For example they’ve put biiluminescent genes from certain fish into frogs to make glowing frogs. Now imagine giving humans the raw power of chimps. Or the ability to see UV light like birds. Or venomous spit. Or the power to smell like dogs.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    make a fallout shelter and have some isolated communities there live off purely of either one of meta, apple, or alphabet products (or any large enough multinational like nestle).

    all for the science of understanding addiction and brand cultism.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cloning is the first one that comes to mind for me. If you could somehow avoid the horrors of the process of learning a reliable methodology the result wouldn’t necessarily be unethical.

  • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Testing a ton of medication for pregnant/breastfeeding women. So much medication I couldn’t take, simply because it’s not considered ethical to have the studies done, since it could affect the baby in all sorts of ways. Which we can’t clear up without the studies. So annoying.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Eugenics. Not the racist BS that was done in the past, but really pushing the limit to see if we can breed super humans. Genetic editing to make humans immune to cancer or disease. Increased lifespan. Resistance to radiation. Smarter. Stronger. Better.

    Arguably, this kind of thing is actually somewhat of a necessity if we ever want to explore the stars. We are far too fragile in our current bodies to survive the difficulties and vastness of space.

    • Aeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly, I’d be super stoked if we could just get rid of all the actual serious defects, just, whack a few moles that really super suck for anyone who gets the short end of the genealogical stick.

      And by that I mean like

      • Huntington’s Disease
      • Early onset and regular non early onset Arthritis
      • My entire family bloodline is prone to heart issues/cancer type beat
      • Crohn’s
  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Raise a child on their own without any exposure to language. Could be interesting to see how their perspective on the world develops.