Will it be effective?

EDIT: The banning event continues. Please consult the modlog to observe.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=7121342

If you scroll down to about a day ago, you might be able to observe an emerging behavior from this mod.

EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!

EDIT 3: The mod has now removed my comment all together, one might assume because it was still receiving upvotes in the 2 hours following my ban. Are there similarities here to Watergate? You be the judge!

  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah, this explains it! Saw I was banned from a community that I’d never posted in and evidently one of the mods is a wanker. Mystery solved :)

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!

    What was the name of that mod on reddit with 5k communities? I remember they were very well known, but it’s been a long time since having an account there.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It sounds crazy to hear someone mods 5k communities or 108 until you put eyes on them and realize most are dead, functionally dead, or memes. I modded 100+ subreddits on reddit when I was there, the drop in population after about the fifth was massive. After about 15 or so we were at truly inconsequential populations.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I do wonder however if it suggests things about a person, that they moderate that many communities. For instance, is it indicative of power seeking behavior?

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Could have been any of a few dozen.

      That being said, there were a couple that were automod only mods. They’d get added to help set up and maintain automod, and never do anything else.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s also hilarious how they thought they could just ban an instance admin, and when it didn’t work call it abuse.

      If you consult the modlog, you can see a point during the hubris at which the mod in question was removed as a mod from the community. It is suspicious, and might suggest they were a mod deemed to be spreading misinformation.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also they made a post which was being openly hostile to Lemmy.world’s mods, I mean what the fuck?

        Yeah that mod was a real piece of work, it’s probably for the best that one of the other mods removed her and her alts from the community, and also is in the process of reversing their malicious actions.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I unironically love the terms “meatsplained” and especially “carnist.”

      On my next date I’ma say: “I’m a Carnist… RAWR” and then click my teeth. Clear test for taking or leaving.

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Corpse munched is a good one. Blood mouth is another. I’ve heard something about cadaver as well, maybe cadaver eater? Can’t remember.

        Seriously how fucking old are you? Does that ever work? It’s just so ridiculously childish and funny.

          • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sorry that wasn’t directed at you. The “you” in my rhetorical question was the silly vegan extremists, not you. That was not clear. Go ahead and claim the word and make dinosaur nodes. It makes their silliness even funnier and takes away all their power.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’d be surprised how often that happens when people find out you don’t eat meat.

        It’s, like, a lot.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        (edit: this was a stupid thing to say.)

        Correction: it was silly, and so I loved it 😂 (Maybe I misunderstood, I just wanted to advocate for it being okay to be silly:-)

        img

  • Xanis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mods 108 communities?

    What we have here, sir and/or madam, is a Reddit mod. Excessive modding, a smell you can’t quite place, same techniques.

    Gotta say: I was hoping we wouldn’t be followed by that type.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is inevitable, all lemmy instances will eventually be taken over by supermods that leverage their power to harass.

      This vegan fiasco isn’t even the first time but I guarantee you the admins will leave them to powermod the remaining 107 as they see fit.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I guarantee you the admins will leave them to powermod the remaining 107 as they see fit.

        Well, in this case the person in question couldn’t handle the fallout of their actions, and actually deleted their whole account.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Powermods like that don’t usually have only one account, and since they can mod themselves wherever they go, they usually do.

          Nuking an account is just changing skins. The admins have the power to track and fix that, but they won’t.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pretty sure the Reddit mods were the biggest group of complainers against Reddits API changes, since they used third party apps in order to mod.

      So it stands to reason a ginormous group of them switched to Lemmy and had plenty of free time to mod there as well.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Incidentally, vegan Spam does exist both in the official Spam brand and in another brand called unMeat. As someone who really doesn’t like Spam, though, I’m unqualified to judge it.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah vegans should not consider themselves as a minority.

      The ANIMALS are the minority group. Not YOU. The entitlement speaks to an ego trip and is a vicious representation of the cause.

      They should have their platform removed because they are hurting the image of the vegan movement

      This is coming from a vegan btw

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Most people aren’t vegan, so vegans are a minority. That’s not difficult to understand, so we have to assume you’re reading in bad faith. Stop it please.

      Edit: veganism isn’t a diet either. Quite easy to find this out if you even stick the word into a search engine.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This might be a language barrier thing, but in most english-speaking countries when you use the term “minority” to refer to a group of people, that typically refers to a group who is a minority based on race, sex, ethnicity, gender or some other inherent trait. You might say, “a small community” to refer to a group within a group, but you wouldn’t say, “a minority community” for that unless you were trying to imply that the community in question was a racial, ethnic, gender, or other form of minority.

        • Bob@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, English is my first language, and all I’m saying is that you could’ve interpreted it the other way, which is plausible at the end of the day, and it’d be true, which is what it means to read something charitably/in good faith.

          • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            While you have a point, my immediate reaction was, “oh cool, now they’re trying to do it too” (I’ve seen tankies claim the same shit). When I probe my brain to try and figure out why that was a response, the result is my brain telling me that I’m hearing some kind of dog whistle but it won’t go into more detail about what makes that statement sound like a dog whistle.

            Tbh, considering how unhinged they’re behaving (though at this point I think they’re doing it for shits and giggles), I wouldn’t be surprised if they truly meant it that way; it honestly wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen someone on here try to claim something like that. I suppose that doesn’t mean they intended to mean it that way, now I’m curious if anyone else had a similar interpretation. I’m used to hearing people referring to racial, or gender, or ethnic minorities when they say something like, “I’m part of a misunderstood minority group”; and I know I’ve heard people from other english-speaking countries (other than the US) do it as well.

          • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have seen the word used in both ways, though I think that in this case the user was intending to use it to imply oppression, rather than simply meaning that they do not have a lot of users.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        To put the shoe on the other foot, how would it sound to you if someone on the Carnivore diet, or on the Atkins diet called themselves a minority?

        It just doesn’t make sense, because dietary choices, are just that, choices. While actual minorities, like POCs and LGBTQ people, are born the way they are. They don’t have any choices in the matter.

        Don’t get me wrong, dietary choices can be a super serious matter, and I am not saying that people aren’t discriminated against for them. I just think its wrong to call someone a minority based on any sort of dietary choice, at least in the same context that minority is usually used.

        • spacesatan@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Religion is a choice, does that make religious minorities not minorities? It’s a strongly held ethical belief system.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Religion, by itself, is normally not a qualifier when we refer to minorites, as that word normally implies an ethnic or racial minority. However, there are some religions with ethnicities tied to them, e.g. Jewish people, and Muslims, so the line can definitely become a bit blurred.

            Jewish people are a minority in most places because of their ethnicity, not their religion. Muslims are often referred to as minorities in most places, because most Muslims are ethnically related, at least as far as the Western world is concerned.

            Some also reuse the word minority interchangably to refer to religious minorities, political minorities, etc, which further blurs the line, but the most common use of the word is in reference to race or ethnicity.

        • Bob@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Again, veganism isn’t a diet (this is painfully easy to find out if you just quickly look it up!) and if you interpret minority in a literal sense, it’s true and relevant because it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the majority if you’re in the minority, which is what the person posting seems to be worried about.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I understand that Veganism is more than just a diet. Its a lifestyle, culture, pledge to a certain set of morals, etc. It can be as important as religion is to a devout religious person.

            A person on the Carnivore diet can make the same point. A person that subscribes to a political identity could also make your same point. This slippery slope leads to Nazis being able to call themselves minorities, because technically, Naziism is a culture, too, albeit a terrible one, and they are very thankfully in the minority of political beliefs.

            • Bob@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The difference being that nazis actually should be overwhelmed by the majority.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s still a CHOICE. No one is born vegan; it’s a position that someone arrives at.

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I agree with you. Unfortunately, the law does not. The law privileges religion as though it was inherent and immutable.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are certainly vegan diets. People who still eat animal produce may still be interested in vegan alternatives without becoming vegan or vegetarian. And I don’t think being part of a small community of a certain life choice isn’t really making you a minority in the political sense (I assume that’s what the minority part is trying to imply here, that there’s some sort of entitlement for a minority protection).

        Also, promoting vegan diets for carnivorous pets is indeed animal abuse and should not be defended or promoted. That’s typically a telltale sign of veganazis, which are generally a terrible thing even for actual vegans as they put the whole lifestyle into a bad light with their overly aggressive rhetoric and disinformation.

        • Bob@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are certainly vegan diets.

          Yes, and there are Muslim diets I’m sure, but Islam isn’t a diet either, for example. Just stick “veganism” into your search engine of choice and the credible sources won’t call it a diet.

          And I don’t think being part of a small community of a certain life choice isn’t really making you a minority in the political sense

          I’m arguing that they may not have meant that. The criticism should be “that’s clumsy wording because it sounds like you mean minority in a political sense” or “surely you don’t mean…” rather than “you’re comparing yourself to (minorities in the political sense) and therefore vegans are bad”.

          Also, …

          Honestly, I suspect your willingness to assume the worst of what a vegan’s said, and that you bring up a minority view even amongst vegans out of context, betrays a prejudgment that plays as much, if not more, of a role as how aggressively some vegans argue in how you’re approaching the whole thing.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, and there are Muslim diets I’m sure, but Islam isn’t a diet either, for example. Just stick “veganism” into your search engine of choice and the credible sources won’t call it a diet.

            And there’s surely people who are looking for traditional Muslim food without wanting to convert to Islam as well. Muslim’s would probably treat people curious about their food less hostile than those vegans would.

            I suspect your willingness to assume the worst of what a vegan’s said

            You can suspect that I assume the worst of any sort of human, especially when they constantly argue in bad faith and with hostile rhetoric. That being said, I don’t approach vegans at all. I just observe the constant self righteous shit flinging they do from the outside, or get unwillingly caught up in it because they can’t help but attack people even outside of their little radicalized bubbles.

            • Bob@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              But then you’re willingly admitting that you don’t speak to enough vegans to have an informed idea of their ethos, which is something I wouldn’t readily admit even if I did it. Not sure what your first point has to do with the matter at hand though.

              • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not speaking to veganazis isn’t the same as not speaking to vegans. Normal vegans I have no issues talking to.

                My first point is about the community that’s about vegan food shunning those interested in vegan food because they’re unwilling to talk to people who eat animal produce.

                • Bob@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I think you’re going on a bit of a tangent I’m not interested in, sorry, but otherwise I’m not really following, and if you say things like “veganazis” it just reminds me of when people used to write “feminazis”.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was curious, so I had a look, seems like it still leads to violence in some occurences

      A Florida man was recently arrested for allegedly stabbing his cousin after a heated debate about whether whole cow’s milk or almond milk is superior.

      The debate over whether to consume animal products, like meat and dairy, or go entirely plant-based (vegan) is a hot-button issue, often filled with vitriol and name-calling online and in real life.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/why-do-angry-vegans-meat-eaters-fight-so-much-2020-2?op=1

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The modlog should at least contain an identifier of the mod. Maybe not a link to their account but something that can be tracked across communities. To see who is abusing their power.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not a vegan or even a vegetarian, but even I can see that my vegetarian friends get questioned uncomfortably all the time for their diet choice. When you do something differently, you inevitably get bullied.

      • BreathingUnderWater@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I used to be a vegetarian for a decade and then a pescetarian before apathy fully set in and I saw how pointless it all is.

        Vegans and vegetarians can be some of the most judgemental gatekeeping assholes out there. Many of them aren’t, but the ones that are militant and overbearing are the worst and only push others from their cause. Those ones desperately want to feel better than others, so become borderline eating disordered to elevate themselves to some holy god level in their minds because they eat beans and lentils.

        They aren’t in the same class as minorities. They choose to eat the diet they do. And no one can visibly tell they are vegetarian/vegan until they tell others they are.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are not in the same situation as minorities, but if they stay true to their ideals, they get bullied just like minorities. The fact there are assholes among them just like in any other group of people changes nothing.

          • BreathingUnderWater@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Getting bullied is not the same as being a “MINORITY”. White kids who are not minorities in North America but get bullied all the time in school. Not eating flesh of a mammal or fish etc doesn’t mean you are a “minority”. Like I said, I’ve experienced life as a veggie. Is it annoying? The stupid questions, the comments people make? Yes. But I’ve never had a cop pull me over and worry about whether I’ll die that day because I don’t eat beef. Or worry, walking down the street, alone at night as a single woman, if I’ll be assaulted because I don’t eat chicken. Non-meat-eaters aren’t minorities in the sense that they are discriminated against in the idea that the word “minority” conjures up. They deal with, at most, someone tricking them into eating meat. Which I’ve had done. It felt violating and offensive but wasn’t any sort of level as someone who is an actual “minority” in our continent.

            • angrystego@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              As I think about it though, the word minority now mosty means an ethnical minority. But when mentioning women - although discriminated against, they’re not a minority in the original sense at all - there is usually the same number of women and men, the problems lie elsewhere. In this sense of the word, vegans are a minority in our society. They could be compared to religious minorities, I guess. It’s a choice, but a choice based on ethical foundations, so going against this choice is unthinkable for those people without being untrue to themselves and betraying what they believe in.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Welcome, and thank you for joining us.

      What are your motivations behind posting these memes? Are they not slightly provocational?

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not a vegan, but what’s the point from the other side?

        It seems like non vegan people downvote the posts from that community without contributing at all, and then are surprised they get banned

        If you guys are willing to debate vegan topics, why not create a !vegandebate and post content there?

        Or just block the community and move on

          • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I mean, it is a valid point to be brought up. A year ago when I joined Lemmy, one of the first advices I’ve read for new people starting out is to block communities they don’t want to see posts from - for whatever reason it may be.

            What happened to that stance? I feel like if it were any other subject than veganism, people wouldn’t bat an eye. I’m not out here arguing that being vegan is like being part of a minority, but there sure as hell is a lot of vegan bashing on reddit. On Lemmy too, it seems

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s also voting to voice what you want to see in a community. If you block every community that has content you don’t like, there won’t be anything left.

              • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I see what you mean. However, I think downvoting to curate a community’s contents shows that you are an active participant in the community which many of the people who drive-by downvote usually don’t

      • Beaver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought the memes were funny though I suppose from the meat eater view they can be seen as slightly provocative.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wanna add that I like your community, I like how you stood up to that rogue admin, I like when you annoy carnists, I like your ban of OP, and I also like that c/fediverselore has posts like this. This community is a tool for calling out mod decisions, and some of those decisions will be good ones that don’t need calling out. It’s still better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.

    • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For the record, I think you contribute a lot to Lemmy, and I really appreciate it. OP’s being melodramatic because blocking a community chock full of content they’d rather not see on their personalized feed (and isn’t hateful, illegal, etc.) isn’t good enough for them. I guess they also need to troll and police different perspectives and how many posts they comprise on this great fedi platform. That’s good for Lemmy /s. Someone should post a PSA about blocking communities that don’t break rules but just aren’t one’s cup of tea. The behaviour helps Lemmy grow and stay diverse. For similar reasons, lemmynsfw (ie, the main porn/adult instance) removed downvotes: because minority communities (eg, rarer kinks) were being downvoted into oblivion - stifling growth and frustrating community members and mods - by people downvoting stuff they didn’t like on their feed versus blocking it

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not a vegan, but what’s the point from the other side?

        It seems like non vegan people downvote the posts from that community without contributing at all, and then are surprised they get banned

        If you guys are willing to debate vegan topics, why not create a !vegandebate and post content there?

        Or just block the community and move on

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And what about those commenting on good faith?

          And what’s the problem with voting on public posts on a public forum?

          I’d love to see vegan content, not … whatever meme shitshow that community has become.

          We can always ask for better.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And what about those commenting on good faith?

            Do you have examples? That modlog is a bit busy as you know, I’m not going to go through it

            And what’s the problem with voting on public posts on a public forum?

            What’s the problem with banning on a public forum?

            There was a post yesterday about vote manipulation by bots (https://feddit.org/post/2795018 ), if people just downvote the vegan content without contributing, it’s not that far from that.

            Or maybe it just comes from them seeing downvotes as “non relevant to the community” and not “disagree”, hence getting rid of people who use it the other way.

            I’m really not sure to get why it’s such a big deal. You got banned from a small community on Lemmy.

            • Were you going to participate to this type of community? Then create another one and post there, if yours is better moderated, people will come to yours (my experience in the past on a different topic)
            • Were you not going to engage with that type of content? Then move on. I’m not interested in US politics, if all the US politics communities would ban me that would be fine, I would just move on.
        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not the vegan posts people are down voting, but there’s been a huge amount of “memes” that do not contribute to the vegan discussion but just try to divide the community

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            They are probably trying to identify people who would rather downvote or post cheeky comments (see OP) rather than block the community, or not interact with it

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, it was kinda inevitable lol.

      It’s one of those things where once you go full jerk, it gets attention. Unavoidable really, unless instance admins want to totally ban “drama” communities, which would just end up as posts on instances that don’t ban drama communities :)

      Preemptive banning is a perfect example of prime drama.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    PSA, stop trying to use the Reddit syntax of /c/vegan, it’s [email protected]. The exclamation mark is what makes it a link. Also please always include the instance the community is hosted on or it will link to different places for different users.

  • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    At this point we should turn Rule 5 into it’s own joke. Bad vibes? Rule 5. I don’t like you? Rule 5. I’m having a bad day? Rule 5. The great servers need a sacrifice? Rule 5. Bitching about Rule 5? Believe it or not, Rule 5.

  • bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    …This would explain my several bans from .ml communities I haven’t posted to lol

    Remember DroneRights/PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES?

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    But I was assured this only happened on ml instances and .world was a blistering Wild West of ultimate free speech 🤔

    (As long as you don’t dislike Nazis, thats what got me banned from the instance)

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s “vegans” like this that make the entire movement look bad. They need to be removed as a mod. The movement needs to be honest by letting free and equal exchange of ideas and viewpoints