• piccolo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I dont know. Probably because it risks being abused. The US already has private prisons filled to the brim with trivial felons forced to work in sweat shops… im sure theyll love to sell their organs too after dying from heat stroke.

          • QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I see, that’s a valid concern. I wonder whether we could try to prevent such abuse by automatically excluding more prone groups like prisoners. It really seems crazy to me how many organs, which could literally save someone’s life, are going to waste.

            • piccolo@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              I think opt out would be sufficient. Right now, its a compilcated to opt in and not many people thinks about it. In my state, the only time you see it, is a small checkbox when you get a drivers license.

              But being opt out everyone is included unless they choose not to, for whatever reason. Which is think is more than fair. Its their body, they should have the right to do whatever they wish, regardless if they arent using it anymore. The amount of people opting out would be a minority, so it shouldn’t really be a concern.

        • piccolo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          No, the current system is opt in. You have to choose to be a donor. Opt out means you have to choose not to be.

        • Bashnagdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Can’t just implant a 90 year old liver. And a lot of them are unsalvageable. Doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be mandatory, just that it will still be a limited resource.

              • Shou@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                In my country, people are automatically registered as a donor. If you don’t want to donate, you have to choose to opt out.

                Ever since that law was passed, I see organ transport ambulances around my city’s hospital from time to time. Transporting a matching organ to a waiting patient. The bold letters spelling “organ transport” on a red band is a weird but good thing to see.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      In my country, everyone is an organ donor unless they specifically opt out. Usually due to religion.

      I’ve been seeing organ transportation ambulances near my city’s hospital from time to time. It’s weird to see, but a good thing.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        There should be no opt out, even for religion. No I do not respect your customs as much as I respect someone else’s life.

        • Shou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I agree. I think people who choose to opt out for selfish reasons should be placed lower on the list. It’s inmensely hypocritical.