Of course I ignore your warnings and proceed to read this shit from the beginning.
And before you say, as many people I’m sure will, that language changes or evolves and so forth: shall I presume many of you have no objection to being called ‘nazis’ in the standard twitter-left definition? Shall I treat all drunk sex as ‘rape’ because kidnapper-rape and frat-sex have the commonality of reduced consent? Shall I treat your remarks about this-or-that group as ‘hate speech’, or ‘violence’, in the form of speech? Clearly, we have some sense by which concept creep exists; by which definitions can be stretched dishonestly. That is what you’re doing, and you know what you’re doing.
I REALLY don’t wanna rank rapes, but isn’t frat rape an archetypal rape? It’s unambiguously terrible to the point that the only defense the perpetrators can mount is that it didn’t happen. This is like decrying the expansion of murder to include defenstration along side the more traditional bludgeoning and stabbing.
However, rationalists do! paella recently did. She got over 5000 responses. https://aella.substack.com/p/the-rape-spectrum-survey-results (tw: rape obviously, paella, idk prolly other stuff i just looked at the graphic) (not fixing this autocorrect)
shall I presume many of you have no objection to being called ‘nazis’ in the standard twitter-left definition
I didn’t know there was a standardised definition, or that it was somehow political-side-specific. If I were to steelman this then this could be about a pedantic distinction between a fascist and a nazi?
Hey, you know what you can do if you feel bad about being called a nazi? STOP BEING A FUCKING NAZI.
Shall I treat all drunk sex as ‘rape’ because kidnapper-rape and frat-sex have the commonality of reduced consent
Yes. Yes you should. Hey, see, you understand this! Also consent either is or isn’t, there’s no “reduced consent”.
Shall I treat your remarks about this-or-that group as ‘hate speech’, or ‘violence’, in the form of speech?
Emm, depends on the remarks? If they’re hate remarks then ye dude, that’s what the word means?
Clearly, we have some sense by which concept creep exists; by which definitions can be stretched dishonestly.
Ye, like how you would define “censorship” I’m sure
Of course I ignore your warnings and proceed to read this shit from the beginning.
Cool. Cool. This is fun.
I already wasn’t going to read this screed, but now I’m definitely not going to read it. Sheesh.
I REALLY don’t wanna rank rapes, but isn’t frat rape an archetypal rape? It’s unambiguously terrible to the point that the only defense the perpetrators can mount is that it didn’t happen. This is like decrying the expansion of murder to include defenstration along side the more traditional bludgeoning and stabbing.
However, rationalists do! paella recently did. She got over 5000 responses. https://aella.substack.com/p/the-rape-spectrum-survey-results (tw: rape obviously, paella, idk prolly other stuff i just looked at the graphic) (not fixing this autocorrect)
there’s no way you can make me click on that
I didn’t know there was a standardised definition, or that it was somehow political-side-specific. If I were to steelman this then this could be about a pedantic distinction between a fascist and a nazi?
Hey, you know what you can do if you feel bad about being called a nazi? STOP BEING A FUCKING NAZI.
Yes. Yes you should. Hey, see, you understand this! Also consent either is or isn’t, there’s no “reduced consent”.
Emm, depends on the remarks? If they’re hate remarks then ye dude, that’s what the word means?
Ye, like how you would define “censorship” I’m sure