![](https://awful.systems/pictrs/image/e953f5e7-94cf-401f-9cb9-eb00666a351b.png)
![](https://awful.systems/pictrs/image/4575d9cc-e543-4949-a170-b3edae95f72d.png)
lmao the paper has a comment section, this is next level science
lmao the paper has a comment section, this is next level science
Yeah I mean, TLP is a lot more perverse. His reactionary ideology pemeates everything he writes but he never comes out and actually affirms anything. The only rhetorical mode is critiquing the supposed psychological perception of theoretical persons. No statement of fact is ever made. Any opinion one could ascribe to the author is plausibly deniable. I find it despicable.
ideological overlap
Oh they absolutely are both infuriatingly coy reactionaries.
Here’s for instance a million words by TLP, and they all say “i hate women”.
I might actually hate TLP so much more, because he’s more seductive, better at that typical nietzschean flattery of the reader, and for some reason even people here tend to view him more positively.
It is really fucking maddening how people like Scott won’t think of morality, or politics, or economics, or really any kind of social or philosophical question, outside of the realm of the psychological. The history of the world can only be about overcoming bias.
I’ll be honest, Scott never gave me hives like a peremptory psychoanalytic reading of myths can.
Remind me, do we have actual proof that The Last Psychiatrist is a real person and not a persona Scott made up for his most unhinged bullshit?
can’t wait for his nuanced reading of anders breivik’s manifesto
Acausal sex, now there’s a concept.
Look up also extremely influential architect and noted fascist Le Corbusier.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unité_d'habitation
The building also incorporates shops including an architectural bookshop, a rooftop gallery, educational facilities, a hotel that is open to the public, and a restaurant, “Le Ventre de l’Architecte” (“The Belly of the Architect”).
It was a huge trend after the war for a variety of economic and ideological reasons.
Look, I already knew Roko was a moron but this is outrageous.
It’s like these people are enforcing a facade of polite tone and measuredness as a way to launder literal intellectual terrorism! Dang!
He is transparently trying very very hard to start a gamergate and it’s pathetic.
The funny thing is: it would be either way!
Right! You’d think they’d want to actually try to look like rationalists, put the petty bigotry aside and bask in the race-realist camaraderie. But no, being a gay truly is beyond the pale.
lol these people are so much more vicious than people here holy shit. i can’t even discern what their problem is. babe please stop hanging out with fascists.
I’n not joking when I say he’s probably using an LLM to write this junk. It reads like it, and he’s already perfectly comfortable with illustrating his diatribes with embarrassing midjourney slop.
lmao he’s such a silly cunt
Back in 1995, when I was born, Gerard was my age
Quillette, Claire Lehmann’s longform magazine focused on science and cultural critique and the home of, among other things, the best-researched article I know of on gender differences in chess
Of course I ignore your warnings and proceed to read this shit from the beginning.
Cool. Cool. This is fun.