As found by @gerikson here, more from the anti anti TESCREAL crowd. How the antis are actually R9PRESENTATIONALism. Ottokar expanded on their idea in a blog post.

Original link.

I have not read the bigger blog post yet btw, just assumed it would be sneerable and posted it here for everyone’s amusement. Learn about your own true motives today. (This could be a troll of course, boy does he drop a lot of names and thinks that is enough to link things).

E: alternative title: Ideological Turing Test, a critical failure

  • Soyweiser@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yep.

    “Yall are in a cult, and it is TESCREAL.”

    “No, you jocks are are doing a religion but dont know it, here is why you are doing ruh-nine-presentationalism, and …”

    “Yeah this it”

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Yall are in a cult, and it is TESCREAL.”

      So I know you were going for a snappy summary, but I think the TESCREAL essay doesn’t call them a singular cult, it draws connections between the letters of the acronym including inspirations, people in multiple letters of the acronym, common terminology, common ideological assumptions, and such.

      I think a hypothetical more mature rationalist movement would acknowledge their historical and current influences and think critically about how they relate to them instead of just going nuh-uh. Like the relatively more reasonable EAs occasionally point out problematic trends in their movement and at least try to address them (not particularly effectually, but at least they aren’t all in total denial).

      • Soyweiser@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah i was just doing the meme from king of the hill. If I go indepth, I would sneer at stuff like: “Because if TESCREALism really is a secularized religion, then… so what?”

        For being a misrepresentation, it is secularized eschatological Christianity, not just a religion. Doesn’t even represent the argument correctly. It is the rapture of the nerds, not the breaking of the Saṃsāra for nerds.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          “shirk” is an islamic term for idolatry/type of heresy, person who does that is called “mushirk”

            • fullsquare@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              i’m not reading all that so idk if it’s used correctly in context, but more usual islamic term for infidel is “kafir” (spellings vary; there’s no single romanization of arabic)

              • Soyweiser@awful.systemsOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah I also dont know what is correct, because they used an odd term, specific to one religion, to which most people reading do not belong, or if they do do not experience that way, so their point is unclear. Like the rest of the text the attempt at sounding well read and learned actually impedes the message trying to convey. Cargo cult stuff. (Im assuming not LLM generated here).

        • scruiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh duh, I remember that meme now. With the people getting on the bus wearing weird white robe outfits?