Chrome is one of the first things I disable on my Android devices, and I hate the idea of signing up for any accounts just to access local files.

But Canon welcomed me with a big surprise, and a fuck you, too!

  • thisNotMyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I figured out how to connect my Nikon to their app (finally) - works somehow, most of the time, but you can only transfer photos compressed to 2MB jpeg. Is there a reason for that? I think it’s annoying to have to delete the duplicates later on

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      but you can only transfer photos compressed to 2MB jpeg.

      I don’t own a Nikon camera, but my Sony, Canon, and Panasonic camera apps allow you to set the size of the transferred photo to “original”, and they do default to something smaller, so I always change it first.

      Do you have that option?

  • mle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Oof, that is new, the camera connect app used to work without an account before.

  • onyxjet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yup, sucks. What I do is just take out the card a plug it into a little USB dongle thing which I can plug into either my phone or laptop.

    Also faster than the app too. The app uses WiFi or Bluetooth. Its also annoyingly finicky to connect tk the camera.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      What I do is just take out the card a plug it into a little USB dongle thing which I can plug into either my phone or laptop.

      What’s wild to me is that anyone would do it any other way. I’m astounded that this is somehow a “tip”.

      Not even 10 years ago it was simply the way to do it.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah but the app also does remote control / viewing. The transfer is a bonus of being able to quickly do the transfer and text it to someone right away.

        Of course, none of this matters because I don’t have Chrome on my new phone and can’t even create the stupid account if I wanted to.

        Also, can’t find information about which version they rolled that out in and get an older version.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Depends on your workflow.

        As an example, if I’m in a studio and have a camera set up a certain way, it’s highly inconvenient to have to turn it off, pull the card out (which can mean removing it from the tripod if the card slot is on the bottom of the camera), plug it into a phone or laptop, copy the image, load the image for review, eject the card, reinsert the card, set the camera up again…

        I mean, holy shit.

        Why do that when you can tap the gallery through the app (already connected because you’ve got live view going), click on the photo, open it for review, keep shooting.

        Of course, if you’ve shot a big day and have to offload 100gb of photos and video, an external card reader is the only way to go.

        But for studio, live sessions, or quick shots, app transfer is so much easier. Some cameras have NFC, so you just tap your phone and start the transfer.

        None of this has ever been a problem. It’s the requirement to have a connected account that makes it a problem.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I think it’s a bit hilarious that touching the camera is considered such a hassle now. When I learned photography we had to finish the reel and spend a day in a darkroom before we could see the final product.

          Still, I hope someone makes some open source software for you. More convenience is always better.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think it’s a bit hilarious that touching the camera is considered such a hassle now.

            If you are being paid for your work, or you are under time constraints, there’s no way anyone would choose to take dozens of steps over a few.

            I still love my older cameras, including one of the first DSLRs (Canon Digital Rebel). No apps. Every feature sold to you is right there in the camera, and those feature still work 20 years later.

            It’s the enshittification of technology that’s the real problem. Most people would love the conveniences offered by advanced features, but not when there’s a catch.

            And this extends to well beyond “regular cameras”. GoPro has completely ruined their hardware by locking basic features (like image stabilization) behind their app and/or subscription!

            When I learned photography we had to finish the reel and spend a day in a darkroom before we could see the final product.

            That’s when photography existed as a skilled art, and a more enjoyable hobby. I miss those times.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Cables are better but they have a minimum time to setup and can be inconvenient if you do it while traveling. If you just need a quick transfer then using an app or wireless transfer is better.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          If you’ve never actually used the Canon app on your phone: I assure you that it would be faster to ride the elevator down from your hotel room, walk to the nearest store, haggle with the store owner for 10 minutes over the price of the cable, get your money changed, buy it, and return to your hotel room than it would be to wait for the app to connect to your camera over wi-fi.

  • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    FYI if you’re shooting tethered the live view functionality and performance of Capture One is infinitely better.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    There seems to be a common thread amongst all the Japanese camera manufacturers that their software is all “this must be done in exactly this (often convoluted) way”.

    I’m convinced that they put their hardware engineers in charge of writing the software.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The app was used for live view and also geotagging, in addition to file transfer. So this requirement affects several features.

  • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not to defend Canon but can you not just use USB or transfer via SD Card? Just asking because I just got an EOS RP.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The app was used for live view and also geotagging, in addition to file transfer. So this requirement affects several features.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        For what it’s worth, you can generally record a GPS tracking in another app or on another device and then use your photo editing software to add the coordinates to the photos after the fact.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’ve used this method before, but it’s extra work.

          I have an old point and shoot Sony that has GPS built-in. Newer models removed this and need the app to do the same thing. It’s like they went backwards on purpose.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, it’s extra work, and doesn’t change the infuriating aspect of enshitification, but it’s an option if you absolutely do not want to sign in to the app

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Alright well I need Geotagging so guess I’ll have to sign up. I completely forgot how shitty Canon were because I got massive tunnel vision while searching for a camera to buy…

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Some other users pointed out that you can stay on an older version before the signup requirement and it will continue to work fine even without an internet connection. That’s what I’m going to do.

          • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            So to get Geotagging I need the camera to be connected to the phone on the latest firmware?

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              You just need the app. Either the older version (no account needed) or the new app (with an account).

              But this also depends on the camera. I believe new ones can geotag live via Bluetooth (with the app). This is how my Panasonic camera does it.

              But you can also set the app to keep a log of your location, so as you take photos, you can have the app tag them before transfer.

              Check your camera’s manual to see how it works.

  • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Dude. I needed to use this app the other day for the remote shutter function, and I was somewhere with no signal and no internet. Only to discover that the app had updated and now required me to create an account to use it. I was pissed.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    In order to access my tax and benefit accounts on the Government of Canada website I can only use Chrome … making sure to wipe all cookies, etc afterwards.

    I freaking hate shite like this.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Is that through the CRA website? I’ve been able to access it on Firefox (through Linux) without being hassled.

      But yeah, websites that force you to use Chrome would get on my nerves. I’d be sandboxing that entire browsing session, too. LOL

      • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I use FF on both Mac and PC for the CRA site. Can’t remember the last time I used a browser other than FF for anything.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’ve had some sites simply not work right with Firefox, so I’ll use an alternative, usually just another flavour of Firefox, like Librewolf or Waterfox, and they tend to work just fine. It’s probably something to do with some of the locked down settings that I use on my primary browser, but it’s nothing compared to forced Google Chrome or gasp Internet Explorer. 😵

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’ll end up with better quality images this way compared to transferring them to Canon servers where they’ll likely be compressed or altered.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not to mention likely cataloged by geotag and used for “targeted marketing” by Canon and “select partners”.

        That shit is just creepy.

          • kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I remember having a PowerShot SX110IS back in 2010 and there was an open source firmware I loaded on it. I forget what it was called. It’s a damn shame that we can’t really do stuff like that anymore.

            • kamen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Magic Lantern probably. Don’t know about compact cameras, but this thing was big with DSLRs 10-15 years ago. What’s pretty impressive to me is that it didn’t require flashing the firmware, it just booted from a memory card.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        They’re not being transmitted to canon before downloading. The camera starts a (slow) local WiFi network that the phone can connect to and it directly transfers that way. This means you still get full quality RAW files

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Jailbreak your shit. You own it don’t you?

      This is a useless comment. Most phones are not unlockable if you’re on a plan, since the carrier technically owns it.

      Second, not all phones are jailbreakable.

      Third, jailbreaking isn’t for everyone, not even close.

      • lemsip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        This is a useless comment.

        Says the person who randomly brought up phones when the other person was talking about a camera jailbreak.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Don’t you gotta jailbreak your phone as well? Otherwise it will require the chrome browser

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            No, installing magiclantern on a jailbroken camera means you don’t need to do the Canon sign in bullshit at all.

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Maybe on Apple (?), bur GrapheneOS supports my banking apps just fine. The only thing missing is Google Pay, which I don’t use anyways

        • krakenx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          How? Having an unlocked bootloader or root breaks Safety Net, which disables many apps. You need an unlocked bootloader to install custom ROMs.

          Magisck used to be a workaround, but Google has been sabotaging it at the OS and hardware layers, so it wasn’t working the last time I tried a few years ago.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Magic Lantern is awesome!

      Unfortunately, it’s for higher-end cameras, not my old point-and-shoot cameras. And it doesn’t magically give your device GPS for geotagging images :(

      The app was fine. The enshittification of the app is not.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Yes, another user already confirmed that the old version still works. I’ve done the same with the old GoPro app.

          EDIT: but old versions have built-in planned obsolescence, because they won’t support newer devices (both cameras or smartphones) for very long. My Samsung 360 camera was rendered useless once they discontinued app support.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I have an old Gear VR and a Samsung S3. I don’t believe there is any way to use it today. It wants to connect to Facebook to log in, but their auth token has expired.

            • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              You actually can still use it, there’s some folks on reddit trying their best to keep it going. App support is very poor though.