The whole point is just a way of not revering the prophet as a god or idol. Like Catholic saints are borderline in their focus on the religiosity of that person but the church chose to ignore it because it was popular and helped them spread their religion.
But the implication is that it only matters for people who are already Muslim. It doesn’t make a difference what outsiders do.
It’s time based. Buddhism also had a similar ban on iconic representation of the Buddha. That’s why some early art will just have footprints or things like that. Islam should allow iconic representation of their prophet within 300 years.
Social ostracization or ridicule is an appropriate response to bad statements, not violence
Is it more stable? I always ended up getting either a kraken or like 2 fps with a giant space station.
F35 is guaranteed to be better than a “6th generation” Chinese plane and they can be upgraded anyway. And it’s actually very successful now with a very cheap per plane cost.
All the rules have been exposed as toothless and being reliant on acting earnestly in good faith. It really doesn’t work in a partisan environment and it wasn’t built for a two party system.
The problem is that when it gets warmer they’re more likely to release it instead of holding it in the soil. It’s easier to store carbon when it’s cold.
What brand is it? I don’t see national alert as a setting?
You mean when Russia invaded in 2022, which nobody expected to actually happen because it was obviously stupid and wouldn’t work? America gave that order?
Nah, the really rich get their own private after hours DMV visit.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kim-kardashian-shut-down-dmv-121732151.html
You don’t think a sovereign country can have a state religion if everyone in the country is part of that religion and wants it that way?