Hypothetically, that is.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lobotomize all conservatives to see if their IQ increases.

    We’ve exhausted all other options.

  • Making chimeras sounds cool as shit. What’s even unethical about it? Why can’t I have an army of beavermen to dam the world’s waterways unless my ransom demands are met?

    Ok, I think I see where the unethical part lies…

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Throwing somebody straight into lava in a volcano. Would be interesting to see what happens.

  • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I love the story of the father who raised his son on Klingon until it became too awkward for modern usage.

    Thought that would be a fun experiment on my child. Don’t know much Klingon though.

  • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Actually just stop allowing anyone with “defective” genes to reproduce.

    I am fully I wouldnt exist in this hypothetical world (-11 vision in both eyes), but I would be curious what would happen if we only ever let perfectly healthy people with no genetic defects have kids.

    Like would it eventually just become a perfect world where nobody needs glasses or asthma inhalers? Or would we die off because not enough genetically “perfect” people exist to make this plan work?

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah it would devolve to being like people with freckles or something utterly superficial eventually

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Any malady that could get through would, in theory, be able to destroy nearly everyone. If the response that would grant immunity to future generations were a mutation with a negative side effect attached, you’ve just ended humanity (assuming any survived). We’ve lost plant species to similar.

      This one example ignores a whole host of other problems with the idea.

    • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s sounds interesting it would also be cool to see how long before defective genes show up again

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    gather massive amounts of stats on the ideal amount of physical punishment to mete out to children to produce the best results in adults.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hypothesis: Conservatives will refuse to believe contradicting facts regardless of punishment.

    Experiment: Use increasingly painful stimulus for negative reinforcement when subjects espouse harmful views, ie racism.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I find those rats with the NOVA1 gene fascinating. I wonder what would happen if we downright tried to give rats human-level intelligence? They are more empathetic than humans I hear, they would make the perfect replacement for our species!

    And another thing I would like to try, is to find a really big person, and see how far they can swallow me feet-first, before they run into problems, or one of us is injured.

    • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I hope you cut your toenails first!

      That said, I doubt anyone would have an oesophagus wide enough to accommodate anything bigger than a hand, so you might need to choose a different host species and potentially, orifice.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      How can rats have human level intelligence, if we as humans have to essentially consume the whole bodyweight of a rat daily, just to sustain our very energy demanding brains.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Good point. We should try something far longer lived, but good at surviving. Crocodiles? Nah…too much work to get them intelligent. Octopuses maybe?

        EDIT: Octopi just to avoid the annoying corrections.

  • Tomassci@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Separate a child from society. Like place them into a void with no human culture. And see what they think later on.

  • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Put a hundred toddlers on an island. Leave a few older children that will disappear a few years later that are taught to fish/hunt/gather. See what kind of language develops, or what kind of civilization. How many survive?

    It is VERY unethical. Add variables to other islands, such as the amount of children, and what you teach them.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is somewhat similar to how Nicaraguan sign language was developed. Basically, kids at a school for the deaf invented it.