• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I assume they mean the live TV offerings, and technically the Hulu splash at the start of every episode is marked as an ad.

    But it’s still scummy.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re modifying a legal document, one of the most detail-focused creations enter. If they only wanted it to apply to live TV programs, they absolutely could have. When people (or corporations) show you who they are, believe them…

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is the TL;DR of what was updated. This is not the actual ToS.

        Not defending, just pointing that out.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s… an excerpt, provided by Hulu from the full document, saying what they are allowing themselves to do with our money. It doesn’t have to be the entire EULA, word-for-word…

    • deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The Hulu logo preroll/interstitial isnt an ad but it uses the same system. I imagine they only mean ads in live TV offerings.

  • JiveTurkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If people would just drop their service en masse they would stop doing this shit. Everyone acts like they can be without a streaming service for a month or two so they’ll just complain as they continue to hand them money.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The reality is there aren’t enough people that care about ads to do that.

      You either grew up with TV commercials or you grew up with ads, the conditioning is already there. There is a narrow band of people who don’t watch much or any TV and got on the internet for most content that remember when ads weren’t a thing. They have done studies and reviewed user data to determine how much ads they can play.

      They might push users to leave by tickling the ad tolerance while increasing subscription fees, but that is unlikely to happen as the frog is already boiled.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I grew up with ads but I still don’t tolerate them, I’m practically allergic to ads.

        Even back then I would just switch the Chanel when ads would start and then so many times just forget what I was watching and watch something else. And even as a kid I already would preference shows running on the public television in Germany because they didn’t have ads, they were played in a different way.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        People who grew up with ads were okay with it because the shows and movies were free.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I’m from Australia so maybe things were different there, but my parents had cable in the 1990s and 2000s and I don’t remember there being ads back then other than promotions for different shows on the same channel. I haven’t used cable since maybe 2006 so it’s definitely possible it’s changed since then.

            I know the US cable channels have a lot of ads these days, but I moved to the USA in 2013 and don’t have experience of how it was like before then.

            The antenna days are still here. I’ve got a HDHomeRun and use it with TiviMate and Plex. It’s great for local news/shows and gameshows. I find new restaurants through local shows that review restaurants for example.

            • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There were ads on cable channels as far back as I remember. We got cable in '85 or '86. HBO didn’t have ads during the program, but every other channel sure did.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                HBO had ads for the other content on HBO (movie trailers, show ads) which also served as filler so the next show or movie could start on the hour or half hour. Definitely a different kind of ad, and it didn’t interrupt what you were watching.

                Still ads, but the least intrusive kind.

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I cancelled everything but paramount recently. Just cant quit star trek. Until I fix my DNS server at least

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      In other areas, yeah, probably.

      But with music, movies, and TV, they’ll just blame piracy, crank up the DRM and bullshit on their own platforms, pat themselves on the back, and raise prices.

    • SeekPie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve been using RD + Stremio for 2 years now, has worked great (except when RD shut down, then switched to Debrid-Link, which was as easy as RD). It costs about 3€ per month, though I think it has been worth it.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d say “sounds like a lawsuit”. After all, you can’t advertise something as no ads, and then show ads.

    But then I remember who is in charge for the next four years and realize they’ll just get away with it.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ve literally been doing this for over a decade, at least. There were always some shows on Hulu that the “ad-free” plan didn’t include as ad-free, though they usually only showed ads at the beginning and the end of the show.

    • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Look being real they would get away with it no matter which decrepit old man was in office or what their politics are. America is a corporatocracy wearing the skin of democracy. When the IRS audited Microsoft for tax evasion, the IRS got sued and defunded through lobbying to the point of being forced to back off. Fucking Microsoft took down the IRS. The world has changed and our old institutions of power are waning.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Another one that shouldn’t be allowed but is are the unlimited* plans where the * indicates that it’s not really unlimited.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anything where the clear statement with such a marker indicating it is not true should be illegal. ‘Up to’ claims should also be illegal unless they are true for 99%+ of users/customers.

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They get away with it with that damned asterisk. So long as you put an asterisk, you could say this comment does not contain English words*

      * comment may contain some or all English and / or any other language words

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you can prove a contradiction then you can prove anything, and here we have ¬ads = ads. BRB there’s some stuff I want to prove that I have.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Writing on the phone … sometimes I should proof read it. What i wanted to write was something like

        If the “no ads” and “ads free” version contains ads, then pirating the TV shows/movies is not immoral either.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think they are pointing out that saying “no ads” and "ad-free about stuff that has ads is not using the words correctly. Could be wrong.

      • casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Grog no like ad. Grog want buy thing? Grog make up own mind. Grog not want ad tell grog what buy, what like. Grog know what grog like.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Call it what it is - copyright infringement. Piracy is the act of robbery on the high seas, but we’ve allowed media companies to take a shit in our vocabularies so we can’t call things by their proper names.

    • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But the CEO of proton assures me that this administration will stand up for the little guy and nominate someone who will do good antitrust work!

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This isn’t new. They’ve been doing that since Agents of SHIELD was on the air. They would start with “this is not included in the no ads plan.”

    • nalinna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. Worked there for a bit. They’re contractually obligated to show ads on certain content. Doesn’t matter what tier you’re on. As a paying customer (a rather long time ago), my partner became so incensed at the ads that played even though he paid for ad-free that he rage-cancelled his membership.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    some titles always have had ads on hulu, regardless of a viewer’s plan. they frame it as being ‘required’ by the content provider… which, iirc, is usually them–a disney-owned entity for these titles.

  • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just assumed this disclaimer was for live sports, which include ads whether you want them to or not. It’s not like you can just leave out the commercial breaks in a live broadcast.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes, you can, and I would expect an “ad-free” service to do so, at minimum replace it with a “commercial break” sign and preferably adding extra commentary.