I have seen many comments saying that lemmy.world sucks, and sh.itjust.works is good. I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances. Why? After a quick look, sh.itjust.works doesn’t look much different to me. Can anyone explain?

Edit: many good replies. the conclusion I’m drawing is that for my purposes it doesn’t really matter. I appreciate everyone who responded

  • Addition@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have accounts on both. Sh.itjust.works has a piracy community that .world blocks and is still federated with Hexbear for some reason. .world has old.lemmy.world if you liked the old reddit UI.

    Otherwise, not that different.

    • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Damn. I was considering making a sjw account to see if the better performance claims are true but hexbear is a dealbreaker. Never going back to that crazy cult site. I know I could block it but they’d still see my posts and comments.

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also note that “blocking” it doesn’t actually “block” much of anything at all - it stops you from seeing the communities located on that instance, but the users will still appear in posts all across the Fediverse, sending their harassing messages to you, pinging your Notifications every time they reply to you, downvoting your own comments, etc. The instance block function is horribly misnamed.

        If you want to avoid this kind of thing, I second that recommendation to try Lemmy.cafe - it is the only Lemmy instance that defederates from the Big 3: hexbear.net, lemmygrad.ml, and Lemmy.ml. The latter one is like 1000x easier to deal with than hexbear, yet still nearly all of the most batshit insane comments I’ve received on Lemmy after defederating from the other two have come from it - and for similar reasons that they get used to how things work inside their echo chamber, and then behave the same way when they venture outside of it - so I consider having defederated from it too worthwhile overall. Although you will miss out on some content such as [email protected] that way.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        For the record, I just added hexbear to the sjw blocklist.

        They use an allowlist and they previously removed us from it, so we were effectively defederated already for most of the past year. But it seems that they may have refederated with us silently within the past couple weeks. I’m not exactly sure.

        Anyway, I’ve heard this rumor about us still being federated with hexbear a few times, so I decided to clarify the situation.

        @[email protected]

        • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          For the record, I just added hexbear to the sjw blocklist.

          Good to know, that whole thing was always a bit confusing

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Basically we were in the process of having a discussion about defederating them, and then they blocked us before we could have a vote in c/Agora.

            So it seemed like the problem was solved. But the fact that they don’t appear on our blocklist has been misleading to others, so I think it’s better to make it official.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Especially because they likely did it knowing they could sneakily refederate later without people knowing, which is probably what they did recently.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They are just two different servers. Lemmy.World is one of the really big ones. I had an account there but because of the size there were a lot of performance issues. I would recommend you join one of the smaller servers like sh.itjust.works. You have access to almost all the same information on the Fediverse.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’ll miss out on the Beehaw community on Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, since Beehaw defederated from them

      Lemmy.cafe is a nice general purpose instance that only defederates from the most extreme instances, while still giving access to Beehaw and all other instances. It’s still small too, so it’d more effectively spread the load compared to creating an account on sh.itjust.works, which already has a pretty huge user count.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    World admins tend to engage in censorship, blocking, and banning of ANY viewpoints that don’t support their compromised world views.

    They aren’t even aware that they are enthusiastic supporters of actual fascists because those fascists have figured out how to manipulate their actions using identity politics and fearmongering.

    world admins

    lifetimes

  • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So far my experience with sh.itjust.works has been shit. I was banned from a community there for “vibes”.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I just looked at your modlog history and it could be for multiple reasons. You have used some offensive language in the past. That probably has something to do with it.

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You’ll have to message the community mods for clarification. They’re the ones who created and maintain the community, so they get to decide who gets banned and why.

              Getting banned for a comment in another community is certainly possible, depending on what you said. I don’t necessarily agree with that moderation style and it doesn’t represent most communities on SJW, but that particular community tends to attract some heavy trolling, so I can understand if they’re a bit trigger-happy on the ban hammer.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most servers don’t micromanage community moderation. That sort of thing could happen almost anywhere.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Legitimately the reason I dropped .world and made an account at SJW. I don’t want my instance admins deciding what I do and don’t get to see without my input.

      Of course, the SJW admins could decide to block it anyway, at which point I’ll make a dbzer0 account

  • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    To those who promotes lemmy.cafe as a solution,
    No shame that the instance doesnt block far rights and pedo instances ?

    Start considerate your self at a moment,

    Not every leftists are for imperialisms… True leftists are humanists, and want the right for people to get autodetermination,

    At a moment, stop being ridiculous,

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I agree with you. IMO, it’s not that different.

    The big difference is between the tankie LARPer instances (lemmygrad, hexbear, parts of lemmy.ml) and the rest of the major instances.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a socialist, you will understand I’m sure that constant being slurred with “tANkiE” from mostly .world users is very tiring

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s fair to call people who white-wash authoritarianism, genocide and roleplay as communists tankies.

        This is not a matter of different opinions. They openly support the russian invasion, the atrocities of the russian occupation and reject Ukrainian identity and self-determination.

        It’s the literal definition of the word.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a difference between being a socialist, and blindly defending authoritarian regimes that claim they are socialist. Those instances earned their reputation for a reason.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Make it a stickie, because barely anyone observes this definition.

          I am regularly slurred as Russian bot or a tANkiE when calling for peace and de-escalation of war.

          Daily .

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Have you stopped to consider that maybe you’re just an asshole?

            No, seriously, you’re whining about being called a tankie when… like dude, you’re a tankie. Half your comments are just bringing up how EU/UK support for Ukraine’s defense is a frivolous waste or similar. I doubt you think of yourself like this but to an outside observer you’re deeply toxic.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I doubt you think of yourself like this but to an outside observer you’re deeply toxic.

              From my position warmongering is deeply toxic.

              No matter how much organizing you do with other anarchists offline, to the .world crowd if you’re to the left of Joe Biden you’re a tankie.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                From my position, the jedi are evil!

                Man, they weren’t kidding about those federation issues. Just now got the notification here. Listen, you’re not wrong that people are reactionaries, this is the internet. Many people need to either figure out they aren’t welcome, or figure out a less confrontational way to present their ideas (me included, often).

                But all that said: there’s a difference between “I think anarchists are largely naive at best” and “This person is a tankie”. I can (and frequently do) disagree with all manner of left-slash political opinions, and I’m perfectly happy to coexist with them since they often have perfectly good ideas that come from a position I disagree with, but can accept.

                What I can’t abide, and what the above asshole espouses, is the brainless regurgitation of pro-russian propaganda. Ideas like “enabling the AFU’s continued defense of Ukraine is unconscionable and the guilt for all the innocent deaths lay at the feet of NATO for enabling this war to continue” are what makes someone a tankie, and are what that person keeps saying. That’s the shit they get pushback on (and which they fail to understand the negative reactions to), because they’re too self-centered to realize that Ukranians aren’t some innocent babes in the wood lead astray by a wolf. They are a people who have fought and died, for hundreds of years, to secure their fucking right to choose the fates they make for themselves. The choice to lay down one’s life for a cause they believe in, that they dictate, is one every culture holds absolutely sacred. How many martyred anarchists are there, who’s names live on in the creed of those who come after them? I’m not even an anarchist and I can think of dozens.

                A situation has arisen which has lead so, so many to make that choice, and while every life lost here is a tragedy I grieve over every day, infantilizing the people who’s lives are freely given? The people who’s lives are being stolen from them? The ones who’ve been found with their hands still bound, dumped in mass graves? The busses full of stolen children, who will never be seen again?

                THAT is what makes this jackass a fucking tankie.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  23 days ago

                  From my position, the jedi are evil!

                  statist cops who routinely perform extrajudicial executions, have largely unchecked mind control powers and freedom to recruit child slaves from pod racing without any sort of oversight

                  Next you’ll probably need me to explain why the imperium of man is evil

                  You seem very emotionally invested in war with Russia, I don’t think opposing that makes people tankies, nor do I see how opposition to war infantalizes the people getting killed by it.

                  Ukranians aren’t a monolith and there were plenty of Ukranians getting killed by their government prior to '22.

            • zante@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              … the root of the problem is your apparent compulsion to call people “toxic” and “assholes” for having different views.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Ah yes, the “no u” gambit. Classic, deadly, refined. The most elegant of rebuttals. A refuge for only the sharpest of wits.

                Anyways, do you mean different views like say, someone holding different (and by your own admission, quite common) opinions about how your conduct reflects on your character…?

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                They’re not calling you that for having different views. They’re calling you that for making up reasons to offend yourself and acting like a toxic drama queen. And the ratio shows they aren’t alone.

                • zante@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  And what is your reason for adding your personal attack to this already well populated debate ?

      • Naryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Says the person who has massive amounts of Antisemitic hatred and are quite happy to full on blow Putin’s dick whilst spouting his propaganda I’m not shocked you’re being called a Tankie

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a huge difference between a tankie and a socialist:

        • Socialist supports economic policy aimed at just distribution of resources
        • Tankie supports fascist-like authoritarianism under a mask of socialism
          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Uh… Yeah, it does. It literally defines the meaning and the context in which the term is used. Thats… how language works. Fundementally.

            • zante@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Goodness me, you are being difficult today.

              I think you can appreciate, that one user’s definition - no matter how agreeable you and I might find it - speaks to everyone’s definition of the same term.

              Especially when we are talking about colloquial slur, like tankie, which isn’t in main dictionaries.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Sure, but it does speak to that user’s definition, which is what they were talking about. And honestly, their definition is pretty much the standard. ‘A pejorative term for supporters of authoritarian regimes, particularly communist ones’ is the definition in some form across every site I’ve turned up in the thirty seconds I spent on this. It’s what everyone else in this thread appears to be using. Seems like its pretty agreed on.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They used a political slur against entire servers and on the left, there is a concept of solidarity.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Solidarity with authoritarians has a long and sordid history of betrayal and being lined up against walls in the end. Anarchists have had to learn that lesson in the most brutal of ways.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yep. They only tolerate you as long as you’re useful. As long as you don’t push back against their mass incarceration, assassination, and even genocide. Authoritarians are authoritarian first. Left or right is a distant afterthought.

              • Naryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Authoritarians are bad but lemme just stick up for Russia and Iran mmmkay.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The two main reasons people attack LW is:

    1. people who criticise it because it is by far the largest instance, and thereby means lemmy isn’t as decentralised as it could be, I think this is a fair point, because it has caused federation issues with for example aussie.zone in the past.

    2. Tankies who get mad the average lemmy.world user does not share their admiration for China, Russia, North Korea, Stalin, and Mao. Thereby accusing the whole instance of being “libs” and “bigots”.

    • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll add 2 more that resonate with me:

      1. Discussions of distributing copyright material is banned. (Not actually sharing, obviously that is illegal, but they’ve banned the mere discussion of it.)
      2. They have not defederated from Meta’s Threads
      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fwiw, LW seems ready to defederate from Threads at a moment’s notice (post), but atm it doesn’t matter since Threads isn’t federating with Lemmy anyway.

        Though it’s still an excellent point to wonder why they haven’t done it preemptively, like pretty much every other instance I’ve heard of (even lemm.ee’s [blocked instance list[(https://lemm.ee/instances) that is shockingly short has that one). Perhaps bc the decision to defederate from any instance, and especially that one, has generated such negative feedback (as the post linked above mentions), they are hesitant to do anything at all, especially again while it does not matter right now.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The way they approached Threads is part of why I stuck with LW. Instance location doesn’t matter much to me and why would I go with an option that is more willing to take choice out of my hands?

          Corporate or not, it should be my decision to interact with it. Unless it’s Nazis or some shit similar, I can block rather than rely on defederation and being told what to do.

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well, I hear that but at the same time the counterargument seems fairly strong. As I understand it (not being a mod of any communities here myself) apparently the mod tools suck pretty bad, especially across instance barriers. And in particular it is reportedly lacking standard filtering capabilities so that if Threads were ever federated with, the sheer VOLUME of content would quickly overwhelm the ability of the mods to keep up. Hence, if Threads were to join the Threadiverse, then Lemmy as it currently is now would have no chance but would cease to exist, almost instantly. And we would become an unmoderated playground.

            I have no idea how Threads itself handles moderation, but at a guess, it wouldn’t (fully?) apply if people with Threads accounts were to comment on posts in Lemmy communities?

            So Threads really is a special circumstance, not at all like federating with hexbear or exploding heads etc.

            Even so, the admins do seem to be listening to the feedback of the users, rather than forcing that choice upon everyone, yeah:-).

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes and I hope I did not come across as negative about lemm.ee’s policies - the “shocking” part to me is not having exploding heads (probably bc it’s defunct, yet most instances keep it there just in case it were to ever decide to resurrect itself, or another in its place using that domain name), and other decisions that are “unusual” (for the largest instances at least) are to not include hexbear.net or even lemmygrad.ml.

            And even given all of that, it still has preemptively defederated from threads.net, which makes it all the more extremely unusual that Lemmy.World has not. Even so, as I mentioned, I get it, for those reasons stated.

            Tangentially, I wonder why more communities are not housed on lemm.ee. The largest is a movies community with only a few thousand subscribers, and already the next largest is down to a singular comic (albeit a popular one). The next largest instance, sh.itjust.works, has 6 communities larger than the biggest one on lemm.ee. I guess it’s related to the whole centralization on Lemmy.World thing, but most instances slightly smaller have communities that are larger - lemmy.ca, feddit.org, lemmy.dbzer0.com, programming.dev, etc.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              hexbear avoided defederation by having admins who are more reasonable than (a not small chunk of) its users, lemmygrad is generally keeping to itself. It’s certainly not because Sunaurus, an Estonian, would have a soft spot for Russian imperialism. We’re also federated with beehaw, btw, as in they’re not blocking us.

              I don’t know why we have so few communities, either. If we had more there very well might be more defederation drama going on because the more communities, the more chance for people to misbehave. movies is a quite harmless community in that regard, imagine [email protected] while being federated with hexbear or lemmygrad.

              I think lemm.ee is just… generic? It’s a place where you can have an account and see practically the whole fediverse, attracting a lot of people who just want to participate, not found communities. feddit.org has the whole German community plus the canonical Europe one, lemmy.ca is Canadian, programming.dev is very very techy, dbzero anarchist+pirate.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      because it has caused federation issues with for example aussie.zone in the past.

      Just to precise, it’s still the case

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lemmy.world has kind of awful moderation, which means people who are trolls or bad actors have lived here for a very long time despite multiple reports. It was only recently that Linkerbaan (the most notorious one of all) was banned, and it took a thread complaining about bans in [email protected] and dbzer0 admins messaging them to get their attention.

      There are other people here like that which never receive permanent bans for consistently horrible behavior. It’s not great, and while I don’t agree with Beehaw’s decision to defederate over it I do think that things could be better. It does degrade user experience to have known trolls and assholes running wild and only getting a slap on the wrist when they do something horrible.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Lemmy.world has kind of awful moderation, which means people who are trolls or bad actors have lived here for a very long time despite multiple reports.

        Maybe people shouldn’t overflow the moderation pipe with reports then just because posts are idiotic. There’s the downvote button for that. I’m just a guy with a full-time job and personal life who on occasion may get ill with a cold or so. So when I log onto Lemmy on PC and I see a dozen of reports having popped up about posts being reported as being “in bad faith”, posts that may be genuinely idiotic but not containing any personal attacks / racism /…, I’m already checking out. Not every idiotic posts needs moderator intervention. Sometimes a minus 25 score is enough. So when there are a dozen of reports about merely idiotic posts, I might miss a genuinely intervention-worthy one.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances.

    It’s the largest by far, with five times the monthly active population of #2. One of the main things people want out of federated systems is decentralization, and having one huge dominant server goes against that goal.

    I should note .world wasn’t the biggest when I signed up. I picked it because mastodon.world was a known quantity, which led me to believe the same team would run a stable server.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    .world is the instance where most new users default to so and it has the highest user base and that includes a lot of trolls or just bad faith actors. Also, a lot of .world is based from reddit users who left and they brought that kind of mindset along. Some people don’t like that either.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What does it matter which users are on which server, since we all get the same content anyways, aside from defederation?

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It doesn’t, except for the ones who like to browse local. And the .world admins have quite a few blocked instances. They seem to be a bit too liberal in defederating to my tastes. I feel as if it runs against the concept of federation itself.

        • celeste@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think that having a choice about what instance you join and whether it’s liberal or conserative about defederating is the beauty of federation. someone might want to be on an instance that’s quick on the trigger about banning for transphobia, racism, etc, because they’re going through some shit in their lives, and later want to experience the greater variety of an instance where banning takes more consideration.

          Like, I think you’re right about what you want for you, but people wanting different things and being able to get it is pretty great.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I agree, it’s a useful feature for certain people. I’m just not a big fan of site admins making the decision for you. It should only be used as a last resort IMO or to protect yourself against illegal content, CP for example. Normalizing defederation between instances can be abused by a small amount of bad faith actors. If you as a person don’t like a certain culture on an instance or community, just block it yourself.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I feel as if it runs against the concept of federation itself.

          So, you believe that operating a website using Lemmy obligates you to host content from other sites that you don’t want to have a relationship with?

          Because the concept of ‘federation’ does not come with the expectation that you abandon editorial control over what you host. That’s an expectation you’re projecting on it.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            No one is obligated to do anything. The admins run the site and they can moderate how they feel. As a user, I can join their site or another one if I choose to.

            My opinion of defederating is that it should only be used as a last resort. Taking a liberal approach to defederation means that a small amount of bad faith actors can completely shut down an instance and make it a pariah on the fediverse.

      • [R3D4CT3D]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it really doesn’t. those that make it about server handles are the reason movements fail, like get over yourself, ppl! hexbear came @ me pretty hard for my instance. fuck em.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        we all get the same content anyways, aside from defederation?

        We don’t, though. We get whatever content people on our chosen instance have subscribed to. Even without blanket server bans, there are Lemmy-based websites that your host has never heard of, hosting content you do not have access to. Someone from your server has to introduce those sites, and subscribe to the communities on those sites, for your server to have their content.

        The fediverse is subscription based. Shit doesn’t get sent around unless it’s specifically asked for.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Being subscription based is what makes it feasible for smaller instances to exist on the fediverse. If every instance had to be a full mirror of the network only a few small groups could afford to host instances.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It also points to what the best use of a federated content sharing network is, and it’s not “create something that looks like it has unfettered access to some canonical whole”. It’s small networks of users with related interests having the majority of their discussions with each other, while also being able to pull content from other interest groups they may be interested in.

            Like, a… to re-use a random example I pulled out of my ass in some other thread… Mazda enthusiast forum, where most people are talking about their Mazdas, but also one person’s really into the New York Yankees, and another also cares about their Dodge truck. The usage case is 80% local discussion, 20% off-site.

            The currently attempted model is “everything is general interest, and you have to search for your niche, and it could be anywhere”, because that’s how it works on Twitter, or even on Reddit (subreddit squatting, subreddit splits, and early millennial internet humour come to mind). But it’s all being done to disguise what the fediverse is, and make it look like what already exists, rather than trying to usher in something different. And it just… can’t compete that way.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They still need to know about the servers, though. There’s no centralized index of servers. If you set up a lemmy-based website today, and you do nothing to make contact with the rest of the network, the network’s not going to find out about you.

            There’s no home to phone to.

            There’s no canonical whole that we all have access to.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your account may be banned by the admins if they don’t like you. If it’s on your home instance, you lose the entire account. That’s why it’s important to create your account on a trustworthy instance (or host your own).

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Basically none. Both are mainstream instances, not practicing any extreme moderation policy.

    You might have confused lemmy.world with lemmy.ml which does have some communities with bad reputation.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here’s the description by both:

    sh.itjust.works:

    A bilingual (EN/FR) general-purpose instance located in eastern Canada! Powered by 99% renewable energy! Everyone is welcome eh.

    Lemmy.World:

    A generic Lemmy server for everyone to use. (…) Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use

    The comments about instances being “good” or “bad” is just plain ol’ tribalism.

    Users get attacked for the instances they registered to, even if they were unaware of instance politics when they actually registered. That sucks!

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Lemmy world has more users and therefore more likely to have more jerks when the jerk to not jerk ratio within an instance is the same.

      There are/were a few instances where staying with their registration is worthy of assuming the worst about them.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Unless their wife put them in chastity. Then their jerk time would be limited to when she said so…

            …did I misread the situation? Everybody’s looking at me funny.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know if I would agree with that assessment entirely, yes Lemmy.world has the same starting Jerk to not jerk ratio. However on Lemmy.world the amount of jerks who aren’t banned is higher than instances like blahaj.zone, dbzer0, or pawb.social. So there are more jerks on Lemmy.world, not because it attracts more jerks or has more users but also because it doesn’t ban them as often as other instances do.

        I’m using jerk kind of loosely but I’ll clarify because people will think I’m trying to say someone should be banned for a rude moment but I’m not. When I say jerk, what I really mean is alt-right troll, transphobe, sealioner, climate-denier, etc. Someone who isn’t obvious enough to be caught as a spammer would but who is still bad for the community.