• spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But when the open source app becomes the best one, it becomes impossible to beat it. Look VLC for example.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are a few examples where the foss version of the app became the best one. I am having trouble remembering others. But I think BitWarden is just as good as any paid password manager.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Vlc is basically what it is because of ffmpeg and the likes, which are… Corporate supported :p
      That said ffmpeg didnt start that way, but at one point it was and vlc quickly jumped into popularity because of it and it quickly supporting new formats ( like mkv back in 2003/2004 ).
      Youre not wrong, but its more complex than that xD

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depending on what you’re trying to create blender is very easily beat by other programs. Almost every time a friend watches me use blender I’ll get hit with “this would be so much easier in fusion 360”

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes slightly worse. Like LibreOffice.

    Sometimes actually better, like VLC.

    Sometimes about the same, like the latest version of MuseScore (older versions were, in fact, quite a bit worse).

    But sometimes, like with older versions of GIMP (I’ll admit, I’ve not tried its latest major version release candidate) it’s significantly worse.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I genuinely doesn’t know there’s paid media player out there, VLC came preinstall on all my prebuild PC purchase since forever.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There definitely exist paid players out there (or at least used to…dunno if they still exist), but there are also “free” (as in beer) non-free (as in speech) options, like the ones included out of the box in a Windows or macOS installation.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      For LibreOffice, I’d go with, worse and better at the same time.

      • I have just noticed, overtime, that it has some problems in some cases, where MS Office does better, while there are certain cases where it does better.

      There are 2 major pain points though:

      1. Calc UI stutters when using the scrollbar with mouse click and drag.
      2. Adding images to files makes the whole thing way slower than acceptable.
    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Krita isn’t that much worse than Photoshop/CSP for digital illustration. That said, going back to CSP after a year was such a relief I didn’t know I needed. So many little stumbling blocks removed.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      365 is far worse IMO. New web only apps (replacing all the desktop apps) are a big step backwards. LibreOffice does everything needed natively and a lot more.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you like professional photography, you can try darktables. It’s a replacement for Lightroom and it’s great in my opinion.

      Gimp is still useful for quick and simple edits. It’s a bit weird to use though.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gimp is still useful for quick and simple edits

        See, the problem with that is that that’s precisely not how I use Photoshop. I don’t use it often (certainly not often enough to actually pay for it), but when I do, I tend to go fairly deep.

        I should try out Darktable though. I used to use Aperture until it was discontinued, and these days I frequently use Lightroom, though I don’t really love it.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      LibreOffice is more than slightly worse, but FOSS projects cover the gamut. The thing about them is that the best ones are usually laser focused on exactly what the user needs, rather than what makes the most money.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Calc was actually quite comparable for 90% of Excel features I have ever actually used.

        Writer is petty good on its own, but the fact that .docx documents don’t quite matchup vs. When making and opening with Word makes it difficult for me to use officially.

        Impress is just plain disappointing compared to PowerPoint.

        Base might be okay, better than nothing I guess.

        The rest of the suite I don’t know.

        • Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Dont edit in shitty formats, edit native, publish to pdf. Skip the pointless MS Office step. If someone else wants to collaborate, great they can download LibreOffice or alternatives for free. If they expect the docx format ask them to pay for your 12 month subscription or stfu.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To quote a non-computer savvy friend from a few years ago. When he was talking to someone else, I just over heard the conversation.

      Na, I use VLC player. It always works, it will play a slice of cucumber.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Libreoffice is slightly worse because all the proprietary office suites keep lowering the bar for everyone to follow them. It’s not a quality issue, it’s a never ending contest to figure out how to complicate writing a simple letter so that everyone has to buy only your software.

      • Baku@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually find MS Word really clunky, laggy, buggy, and generally intuitive. LO I only find to be clunky

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes the open source equivalent is better. SmartTube is a much better app than the official YouTube app for Google TV / Android TV even though there’s just one developer working on it.

    Similarly, pirate TV/movie apps often have a much better user experience than the legit ones. Compare Weyd, Syncler, or Stremio+Torrentio to the Amazon Prime video app for example.

    In both cases, the people who work on them usually care about the user experience and use the app day-to-day themselves, rather than being told to do whatever makes the most money for the company.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Slightly worse? I can actually sort and the video player actually works, instead of whatever the FUCK was going on with the other place, for literally ever.

  • Luke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been thinking about this often lately as well. These fucking corporations with multiple billions at their disposal, and all they can produce is shit like Windows or macOS? AND it also costs money to use? AND it has ads in it?

    Meanwhile a bunch of nerds working for free on a passion project are giving away software that is faster and easier to use and often more beautiful to look at.

    I guess I’ve simply reiterated what the post image said, so ignore me maybe, but fuck this is depressing and disappointing. All these corporate resources and all they can do is barely achieve what other people do for free in their spare time? What a fucking waste of human life and energy is capitalism.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, it’s such a compelling point to made for why capitalism is a shit economic system. Regardless of if someone is compelled by communist/anarchist economics, at the very least it should be obvious that capitalism produces only the most profitable products, not the best products.

      • gfle@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You need to buy an Apple-branded computer to use it (at least legally). It’s price is just included in the device you buy.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For real open source projects, it’s a lot of the time not nerds working for free.

      All your favorite frameworks and libraries are often developed in house at big companies (angular, react, vue, tensorflow, Kafka, pytorch, k8s, Jenkins, and many many more).

      And even then, much of the development on them is done by people who are getting paid to use the frameworks at smaller companies.

      There are tons of examples the other way too of course, but even the Linux kernel is mostly corporate commits, Google, Huawei, Oracle, and others.

      This isn’t inherently bad, but it’s not as cut and dry as people make it out to be.

      I want to add, that language development is also often done by companies. Today for example is a Mozilla thing, and while a non profit, the devs aren’t working for free.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you have any idea how many jira states our development workflow has?

    I wonder how much appetite there is for project managers and scrum masters in the open source world.

    • shutz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s funny to me is, the agile approach seems like it’s a much better fit for open-source, non-commercial software development.

      The corporate world and is management practices based around quarters and deadlines can’t seem to see how anything could get done without deadlines, but that’s usually less of a factor with open-source. People laugh at “scrum masters” because in a corporate environment, all the scrum stuff tends to be mostly performative. But it seems to me that open-source projects with multiple contributors already kind of work in an agile manner.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    the problem is that in the vast majority of cases, designers aren’t involved. it’s just code monkeys trying their best to implement functionality but without UI/UX design they are barely usable by the average person. I guess just by its nature open source is less of a concept in design so you don’t get many volunteers. also designers are probably more averse to doing work for free since every goddamn costumer tries to get them to work for free.

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    And then you have Blender, Krita, OBS, VLC, bitwarden & Let’s Encrypt.

    But tons of corporate contribution to big open source projects so it is sometimes grey.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Open source is the free bicycle that will get you to the coffee shop. Priority software is the SUV you lease to do the same.

    Enjoy being poor.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we’re talking Lemmy and Lemmy clients, I’d argue it’s a helluva lot better. For one, I can rotate my fucking screen

    Hell, the thing that got my to switch was when they got rid of third party apps, because of how absolutely abysmally shitty the official app is

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Voyager for Lemmy is some seriously gourmet shit.

    But seriously the answer is usually that the big company is trying to apply to ALL USERS and usually only pleases a subset or none of those users.

    Voyager isn’t for you? That’s fine, Lemmy has a nice API and you can build whatever you like. Lemmy is also open so if that API isn’t nice you can provide suggestions and fixes.

    I’m not saying it’s perfect, but it’s a pretty good place to be.

    Look at early Twitter or formerly Reddit. A nice API. Tons of fantastic clients. Open source is the best, but even just “open” is a fantastic first step.

    • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Voyager is indeed a really good app for Lemmy. It is based on Apollo app which was the best, and IMO, the only sensible way to browse Reddit on iOS.

      I am glad @[email protected] had a working version ready merely days after the new TOS came into effect.

      I have been using it since it was called Wefwef (which I still feel was a better name, more playful), and I liked it so much that I use it on my Android phone as well as my iOS daily driver.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Closed sauce app isn’t always better, and big corp don’t have ‘all stars’ teams (but do have marketing teams) - the question is why the fossy app doesn’t change UI design every few months (mostly in stupid ways) :D.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sometimes not mutually exclusive. Its not common but it does happen. Iphone rocked the industry. Photoshop dare I say it, was the standard. At least at first.