I guess I’m saying I wished he hadn’t changed, and just did the thing he said he was going to do originally.
Harper wrote a fantastic essay on electoral reform before he was elected.
I’m not impressed by a liberal or conservative supporting reform when polling shows they’d benefit from the proposed change and then immediately forget it once they’re elected w/ FPTP.
Wow imagine if he just actually kept his campaign promise
I’m not in a place to actually help as I’m on vacation: but since it’s a compile issue, if you posted a minimally failing-to-compilr version (no credentials) of your full YAML someone could conceivably be able to troubleshoot it
Can I vote for obsfuscators not holding a language hostage?
These are great, but get details about a pension contribution plans, as these can be lucrative.
Well the top comment was “fuck these people” so if the goal was to build broad public support it is having the opposite effect.
Alternatively, EVERYONE is cheering for those fucking Orcas, so… Imagine being dumber than a whale.
I generally agree.
That being said… All of the analysis, all of the sound arguments… They’ve already been made 1000 times.
This is different in the sense that it provides no explanation. Face. Word.
It’s not anti republican. It doesn’t induce shame in a reader simply for identifying as Republican.
There might be a subset of disillusioned republicans for whom this actually is actually a persuasive approach.
Edit: And I actually applaud whatever nerd realized that all the nerd talk has been had and was brave enough to try something else.
The one China policy is just a diplomatic hedge.
Everyone will SAY there is “one China”, but nations can make defense pacts with specific “parts” of China, even in the event of “invasion” from a different part of that same “one China”.
One China is about those mental gymnastics. Buying into “one China” isn’t about supporting the reunification of Taiwan. Never was. It’s the opposite.
Yeah. Not embarrassed about this at all. And a narrative that I should be is bizzare to me.
Removed by mod
Why does gender identity being a social construct mean conversation therapy would work? I don’t follow the logic behind that assertion.
I see no reason why you can’t be biologically predisposed to identify as things that are socially constructed.
I think an argument could be made that since gender is a social construct anyways, the idea of “alpha”, “beta”, and “sigma” males are different genders.
Lol, so if I’m hearing you right, people who yap endlessly about “being alpha” are “beta to alpha trans”?
Here, take this cigarette!
Moments before what in retrospect was inevitable, Jeremy realized he shouldn’t have crammed his rectal cavity with cheddar cheese that morning.
You don’t want a department that you throw it over the fence to, you want them embedded on your team. Keep those feedback loops TIGHT bois
I think it’s significant in principle at least.
Part of the reason that the youth are so disillusioned is that nobody in the older generations show any interest in protecting them in any sense. From abstract things like the projected future climate in which they will live, or in the concrete immediate of swarms of police.
Intergenerational solidarity isn’t something these students have really experienced.
I appreciate your citations!
In a documentary I watched on the subject, an “expert” stated that local police had tested the device tested before the FSB grown ups showed up and their findings that they WERE explosives, not sugar.
I don’t have a definitive source, but it’s my understanding that the “sugar” line actually was actually directly disputed by initial findings.
I agree it’s not a blockchain, (although it has chain properties) but it is kinda decentralized. By convention projects almost exclusively have a single remote, and by convention that single remote is treated as an ultimate source-of-truth… But you can absolutely have the same repo with multiple remotes defined, and one could establish different schemes to determine which branches on which remotes represent what in terms of “truth”.