• Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was always told never to talk about politics or religion because guaran-fuckin-teed you’re not going to change someone’s mind, and it’ll just end in arguments.

    Obvious exceptions are politicians/pedophiles but that’s neither here nor there

    There are a billion topics you can share your opinions about and change people’s world-view for the better, please America, SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT POLITICS AND RELIGION!!! 😂

    Yes it’s only yous savages

  • sleen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Peaceful arguments is just not a thing online. There is no learning nor seeing the other perspective - Just people being defensive and manipulative.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It unfortunately also not a thing in real life. Tried to convince my mother’s partner that transphobia and homophobia is bad. Best I could do is to him admit it was not about “protecting the children”.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It never has been and never will be about protecting the children, not with the full roster of diddlers they keep in positions of authority…

        • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          A human trafficking minor fucker was tapped for AG.

          Roy Moore, the guy that was supposed to replace Jeff Sessions as senator wasn’t allowed in the mall. Too diddly.

          “They’re not sending their best.”

          • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I know it’s wrong and primarily unjustified to think this, but sometimes I feel that we’ve evolved not at all as a species. We’ve developed fancier stuff, but barbarism is alive and well. It’s just wearing an expensive suit now.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You win debates for onlookers, you’re not meant to change the perspective of the person you’re debating, you’re meant to make them look like idiots so that any lurkers who quietly agree feel bad and change their viewpoint. The left lost because they weren’t willing to do this hard enough.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The on lookers don’t care. That’s why they are on lookers. The best you might do is prevent someone searching for an ideology blindly adopting some rando’s. Honestly, though, if they are letting rando’s arguing online form their worldview you are far from actually helping them.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They don’t care consciously, but subconsciously they’ll know and remember the time and idea was defended badly whenever it comes up, especially if their knowledge on it is a blank or close to blank slate.

          If you make it entertaining and thus a source of dopamine, and even better yet very consumable - you’ve got bonafide content and then people start caring, even if it’s only for lulz.

          They’ll associate your views with intelligent witty dunks and the dopamine they bring and have a favourable view of them.

          That’s both the model of the “Le angry feminazis!” reaction channels of the post-gamergate world and the hbomberguys of the world, especially his earliee stuff.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is possible, but especially in the bigger communities its usually just throwing poop at each other(that’s at least my experience).

      • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah I’ve burned a depressing amount of time in conversations that aren’t going somewhere. And yet, I keep finding myself back at that toxic ass watering hole 😔

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I find it’s helpful to practice parsing political arguments and recognizing underlying worldviews as well as understanding and applying my own. With the right attitude it can be a compassionate and worthwhile way to put good out into the world. But still, have to be measured with how invested you get and know when to walk away.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s so weird to me that people will respond to something and then get angry that I don’t engage them in debate. People don’t owe you anything.

    I fell super hard into this in 2020. I would try so hard to gently explain to people that, yes, COVID is real and that, yes, Donald Trump lied about election interference. There was some post about more people in some county voting than were registered. I literally found the county’s records and showed them that no, there were more people registered than voted and that the post was a lie. You know what they said? “You found that with Google, which is a liberal source.”

    It’s not worth it. I don’t engage. I’m a much more stable and happy person because of it.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Actually, debate between hostile strangers online serves an important role in churning up internet drama. This is vital to the continued survival of the popcorn industry.

  • A7thStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side.

    -Sartre

    Two additional sentences at the end of the often posted quote from “Anti-Semite and Jew”. Those two sentences were always included in the quote when I first saw it making it’s round years ago. Now it takes hunting to find the complete quote. Most sites cut it off after “the time for argument is past”. I wonder who would benefit from us forgetting those last two sentences.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Also don’t forget that a considerable number of the users that would engage in a debate with you are either children or bots.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The internet would be a different place if you always got to see a picture of who you’re arguing with (people would immediately see that I can’t be wrong)

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or trolls. I swear the internet as a whole forgot that the best way to deal with all of the above (AND idiots!) is to stop engaging.

      I blame modern social media. People are too well trained to feed the algo, even here on the fediverse.