• PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is a spin on the truth. Slavery has never not been illegal per the US constitution, it is just only legal for prisoners. We had a prop on it to disallow mandatory labor in prisons in California. We voted against it because Americans have a hard-on for punishment. Personally I think being caged is punishment enough, ESPECIALLY when you consider the sheer volume of for profit prisons in the US. Hurray, private business can keep doing slavery in the state -_-

    It has been and still is legal in federal law across the US

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      How is it a spin on the truth? Forced labor sounds a lot like slavery and they voted in favor of it. Just because some people justify slavery with a reason like “criminals deserve it!” or “but look at their skin color!” doesn’t change that they’re voting for slavery. Just because the criteria isn’t directly skin color (80% of prisoners are not non-hispanic white… so its pretty much is still forced labor based on skin color) doesn’t change it at all.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Wow you really put a lot of cheap assumptions on what my point was instead of just waiting for me to answer (especially when I said exactly why it was a spin the first time…), you kind of suck. Stop assuming the worst as step 1 in how you deal with other people.

        The spin is they took the truth “this will continue to be legal in California and the US” and spun it into something that makes it sound like its just California, like were upholding some accent California law. It is a shifting of the narrative that this is legal across the entire country, which is much more concerning, and making it seem like this is a California only problem.

        Also the title saying the US is collapsing, being active tense, implies that this decision is part of the cause, like this hasn’t been in the US Constitution since 1864.

        But yeah were definitely collapsing, just for other reasons lol

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And yet, California voted affirmatively to be a slave state in 2024. I did not have that on my 2024 bingo card.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        continue to be a slave state*

        Like the rest of the entire country already is*

        My point being that it should be more shocking to people that this is the way of the country as a whole instead of framing it as a California only problem.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It takes a 2/3rds majority of both legislative chambers, and 2/3rds of the states to pass a new amendment. There’s not any question as to why we’re still stuck with that line in an amendment passed in the 1860’s.

          California has never before held a referendum on slavery and was admitted as a state in 1850 as a “Free State” because of a compromise on the national level.

          In 2024, they voted for slavery. They can no longer hide behind the onerous process of editing the 13th amendment. They specifically voted in favor of slavery.

          That’s fucking huge.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Inmates shouldn’t have rights. They are worse than animals, have no conscience, no reform measures have actually worked in terms of reducing recidivism, and victims matter more than offenders.

    Having them do “Slave labor” is justified.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Basically because we’re the 4th largest economy in the world, and thus, billionaires also run this state.

    We also didn’t get rent control adjustments, or a minimum wage hike. So yeah.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      At least we already indexed minimum wage to inflation a while ago so it will still go up, just not by as much.

  • QuantumStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wasn’t the ballot initiative also deliberately confusing? I remember seeing something about it and reading it myself and going “what the fuck is the answer for no slavery?”

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, it wasn’t. It had no argument against, no supporters against, and the text was extremely simple.

      • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes/No Statement

        A YES vote on this measure means: Involuntary servitude would not be allowed as punishment for crime. State prisons would not be allowed to discipline people in prison who refuse to work.

        A NO vote on this measure means: Involuntary servitude would continue to be allowed as punishment for crime.

        Although I can’t seem to find if this text is on the ballot to explain it

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Clearly most people don’t consider forced labor slavery in a prison environment. At least not in California or any of the other states that allow it.

    I voted against it because I think they are plenty of prisoners that want to work, so we don’t need to be forcing people, but I also understand how people could just consider it a part of the punishment too. I mean, you take away so many rights of a person when you imprison them. What makes this facet special? Is it because we used the magic word slavery and so people suddenly feel guilty because of America’s past?

    The prisons themselves litreally didn’t care enough to even argue against it, which should tell you how little this actually impacts their workforce. My understanding was that people were just getting upset at having to do wildfire related work when things started getting dangerous after they reaped all the rewards and training for that job.

    It’s like being a firefighter for the pay, chili, and comradery, then balking when you are told to go fight a fire. Your average person could do that and probably be fired on the spot. Prisoners don’t get to make that decision.

    • finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You understand they weren’t paid for that training or job, right?

      You understand they weren’t allowed to do that job when they were out of prison, right? Even as a volunteer they’d be disqualified. They received no benefits for risking their lives, but we’re punished if they did not. They were not sentenced to death.

      To your main point, slavery is bad in all contexts. Corporations shouldn’t get to have slaves because they pay their workers so badly they turned to crime.

  • laverabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It has not collapsed yet. Democrats are electing a new chair RIGHT NOW (I don’t know the date, but in the next few weeks).

    They are going to elect a centrist. We can stop them. Now is the time.

    If the new DNC is progressive and inspires people, it will prevent reluctant Republicans from going full scorched earth.

    A progressive platform will win Democrats the white house for the next 20 years. Ask FDR how I know.

    This, right now, is the final chance we have to prevent collapse.

    Spread the word, share & cross post.

    https://lemmy.world/comment/13487524

  • molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds.” Makes you question if Californians really care for the marginalized.

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand your first sentence. California is way more evenly matched than people would like to believe. There’s also a bit of selection bias where the super racists leave after a few years because what is objectively not a particular caring state is still too “woke” for them so they try Texas/Colorado.

    • egonallanon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean given what I’ve seen of their treatment of the homeless it’s very obvious many if them don’t.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    California is not the most progressive state. It’s just so big that it being progressive makes the news more.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only thing that pissed me off more than Trump winning, was seeing how many good Props failed, and bad ones passed.

    I’m glad we made LGBT marriage part of our constitution, but jesus christ the voting base here is NIMBYs, NeoLibs, and Conservatives.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My guess is that all those people who didn’t show up to vote dem weren’t around to vote for the other dem items.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There was a certain irony in ranked choice ballot initiatives failing while the same people that didn’t show up complained about both candidates being “exactly the same” or to punish the Democratic party.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Can you expand on that? Good news in American politics would be a nice change.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        • California made it in the constitution that marriage is between two people, gender or sex is not considered what counts
        • And we also made it so Medi-Cal gets a permanent chunk of funding no matter what the budget is doing.
  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And all because 1950s McCarthyism incepted America with a seed that may eventually destroy it long after the USSR’s dissolution

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d zoom out, Capitalism has a growth phase and decay phase, we are at the tail-end of the decay phase and need to jump to Socialism.