I’ve found that AI has done literally nothing to improve my life in any way and has really just caused endless frustrations. From the enshitification of journalism to ruining pretty much all tech support and customer service, what is the point of this shit?

I work on the Salesforce platform and now I have their dumbass account managers harassing my team to buy into their stupid AI customer service agents. Really, the only AI highlight that I have seen is the guy that made the tool to spam job applications to combat worthless AI job recruiters and HR tools.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I abhor it and I think anybody who does actually like it is using it unethically: for art (which they intend to profit off of), for writing papers or articles, and for writing bad code.

    • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think that you’re right, with the way that our society is structured, it is unethical. It’s essentially the world’s most advanced plagiarism tool.

      However, being realistic, even if no private individual ever used it, it would still exist and would be used by corporations for profit maximising.

      In my opinion, telling people that they’re bad people for using something which is made unethically isn’t really helpful. For example, smartphones aren’t made ethically, but the way to get that to change isn’t to change consumer habits - because we know that just doesn’t work - it’s to get organised, as a collective working class, and take action into our own hands.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Totally second the latter part - it’s the self destructive nature of being blindly anti-AI. Pretty much everyone would support giving more rights and benefits to people displaced by AI, but only a fraction of that group would support an anti-AI mentality. If you want to work against the negative effects of AI in a way that can actually change things, the solution is not to push against the wall closing in on you, but to find the escape.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Corpos are currently shooting themselves in the foot by trying to sell an essentially useless product which only lowers the quality of everything it touches.

        I’m sure someday it will replace the press number phone machines, at the cost of accessibility, but otherwise I cannot imagine it “maximising profits”.

        • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Can you seriously not imagine how a corporation could benefit from generative AI, or are you just being obstinate and saying it’s useless because you think it’s unethical and you hope that by saying it’s useless that you can effectively manifest that?

          Because there are plenty of use-cases for generative AI. None of them have to be good, or even products. Your phone machine example is a good one - it’s not a product, really, it’s taking the role of a human to fulfil some obligation, or to intentionally make it harder for people to add to the company’s support burden.

          I think there are some useful applications for generative AI, but I do agree that the incarnations we have are unethical. And again, I really don’t think that simply telling people that they’re bad people for using it is going to win them over to your side.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use it when I get stoned with my mates and think of funny shit to generate.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Is this discussion? I added my answer onto the pile for OP’s question. I said I dislike a thing and everyone who uses it, never at any point expressing any uncertainty or confusion on the matter. Then user b said they use it and explained how. If anything they seemed to want to be insulted, and in that sense I was quite nice about it.

            • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Clearly, their intent was to provide an example of a relatively harmless use of AI as a way of demonstrating to you that your position may have been a bit reductive.

              Your reaction, of behaving like, lets be honest, a bit of an asshole, wasn’t really warranted.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I tried really hard not to engage with this obvious bait but I guess you really want it.

                If you require AI to be amused while high then congratulations you’re the most disgruntled creature on the face of this earth. Too bad you’re still paying for a business sampling works without permission or accrediting authors.

                Shit counterpoint by a shit person.

                • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  First of all, most AI tools have some free tier. I doubt the other commenter paid a penny.

                  Also, just because they did it, it doesn’t mean they “required” it… I’ve laughed at cat videos before, that doesn’t mean that I require cat videos to be amused.

        • Zozano@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I meant to reply to you, to illustrate it’s not always unethical; a point you raised, not OP.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It is always unethical and I made it very clear that people like you are people I dislike, so stop trolling and ragebait elsewhere.

            • Zozano@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not trolling. Why is it unethical for me and my buddies to generate images of a duck with the head of an elephant?

                • Zozano@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  For the sake of brevity, I’m just going to agree that I’m sea-lioning.

                  Now, explain how what I’m doing is unethical.

                  Do you think it’s unethical because it uses stolen art?

                  If so, I don’t think there’s an issue because I’m not publishing anything I generate.

                  Do you think it’s unethical because of the electricity usage?

                  If so, you could make the argument about any frivilous activity which generates electricity.

                  I really don’t know of a compelling reason besides these two which raises a red flag for you.

  • tehmics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s great for parsing through the enshittified journalism. You know the classic recipe blog trope? If you ask chatgpt for a recipe, it just gives you one. Whether it’s good or not is a different story, but chatgpt is leagues better at getting to the info you want than search has been for the last decade.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s great for parsing through the enshittified journalism.

      It’s ironic that GenAI is great for solving a problem it caused. It’s like hiring a gangster to take you through gangster-controlled territory.

  • BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I use it for coding (rarely pure copy paste), explaining code, use/examples, finding tools to use. Better translation than Google translate for Japanese. Asking for things that search engines only gives generic results for.

  • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have a local instance of Stable Diffusion that I use to make art for MtG proxies. Prior to AI my art was limited to geometric designs and edits of existing pieces. Integrating AI into my work flow has expanded my abilities greatly, and my art experience means that I can do more with it than just prompt engineering.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It helps make simple code when Im feeling lazy at work and need to get something out the door.

    In personal life, I run a local llm server with SillyTavern, and get into some kinky shit that often makes for an intense masturbation session. Sorry not sorry.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I work on a 20+ year knowledge base for a big company that has had no real content management governance for pretty much that whole time.

    We knew there was duplicate content in that database, but were talking about thousands of articles, with several more added daily.

    With such a small team, identifying duplicate/redundant content was just an ad-hoc thing that could never be tackled as a whole without a huge amount of resources.

    AI was able to comb through everything and find hundreds of articles with duplicate/redundant content within a few hours. Now we have a list of articles we can work through and clean up.

  • sfxrlz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    it’s useful for programming from time to time. But not for asking open questions. I’ve found having to double check is too unnerving and letting it just provide the links instantly is more my way of working. Other than that it sometimes sketches things out when I have no idea what to do, so all in all it’s a glorified search engine for me.

    Other than work I despise writing emails and reports and it fluffs them up. I usually have to edit them afterwards to not make em look ai-made but it adds some „substance“.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Results do vary, but if we’re talking that universal vocal remover, it definitely seems to be a competent enough program.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been finding it useful for altering recipes to take my wife’s allergies into account. I don’t use it for much else. And certainly not for anything important.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    As a college student, best experience I’ve had is just generating stories that you can easily tell are AI written by use of specific language.

    Second best was when I tried taking pokemon from older generations, taking their BST, telling an AI (perplexity) that I wanna give them gen 5 BST, providing a spreadsheet with all gen 5 pokemon w/BST and each individual stat, and using whatever it gives me as a baseline for making BST edits.

    Otherwise, I wouldn’t say I’m a big fan of AI since I don’t have many uses for it myself.

  • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes:

    • Demystifying obscure or non-existent documentation
    • Basic error checking my configs/code: input error, ask what the cause is, double check it’s work. In hour 6 of late night homelab fixing this can save my life
    • I use it to create concepts of art I later commission. Most recently I used it to concept an entirely new avatar and I’m having a pro make it in their style for pay
    • DnD/Cyberpunk character art generation, this person does not exist website basically
    • duplicate checking / spot-the-diffetences, like pastebins “differences” feature because the MMO I play released prelim as well as full patch notes and I like to read the differences
  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    My corp has been very skeptical and suspicious. So far the only allowed ai is to summarize slack. For channels that I want to keep in the loop but not waste time monitoring, it creates a nice summary of recent traffic.

    I was trying to help one guy who used an online ai despite it being against policy. However he was just using it as a search engine to find a code solution and it took way too long to give him the wrong answer. A search engine would have been faster but he’d have to use his own judgement to identify the wrong answer. Pretty arrogant guy despite not knowing what he was doing, so I didn’t fight it when he insisted he was going to follow what it told him

  • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know those people who have no creative skills or drive, but want to be thought of as a creative?

    You know those people who have this really neat idea for an app, but they don’t plan on making it themself because they’re “just an ideas guy”?

    You know those people who will offer to pay in exposure? I mean, do you really need to be paid just to draw some pictures anyway?

    You know those guys who send you a picture they got from google images and claim this to be a girl they know?

    That’s the vast majority of the AI audience. I could probably sum that up with the word “parasite”, but I wanted to be thorough.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I thought it was pretty fun to play around with making lyrics and rap battles with friends, but I haven’t found a particularly usefull use case.

    • ccp@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I tried to give it a fair shake at this, but it didn’t quite cut it for my purposes. I might be pushing it out of its wheelhouse though. My problem is that, while it can rhyme more or less adequately, it seems to have trouble with meter, and when I do this kind of thing, it revolves around rhyme/meter perfectionism. Of course, if I were trying to actually get something done with it instead of just seeing if it’ll come up with something accidentally cool, it would be reasonable to take what it manages to do and refine it. I do understand to some extent how LLMs work, in terms of what tokens are and why this means it can’t play Wordle, etc., and I can imagine this also has something to do with why it’s bad at tightly lining up syllable counts and stress patterns.

      That said, I’ve had LLMs come up with some pretty dank shit when given the chance: https://vgy.me/album/EJ3yPvM0

      Most of it is either the LLMs shitting themselves or GPT doing that masturbatory optimism thing. Da Vinci’s “Suspicious mind…” in the second image is a little bit heavyish though. And those last two (“Gangsterland” and “My name is B-Rabbit, I’m down with M.C.s, and I’m on the microphone spittin’ hot shit”) are god damn funny.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Chat GPT enabled me to automate a small portion of my former job. So that was nice.

    • grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I like asking ChatGPT for movie recommendations. Sometimes it makes some shit up but it usually comes through, I’ve already watched a few flicks I really like that I never would’ve heard of otherwise