• BonerMan@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      You can be racist against the citizens of a country. The “race” (what a shit word for humans) isn’t of matter to be racist.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Technically since racism is prejudice + power, we’d have to know they belong to whatever ethnic group holds power to know it’s racist, it might be prejudice instead. The race actually does matter according to the sociological definition, that’s why in the US they say only white people can be racist, in China it’d be Han Chinese, etc.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Right, but if you’ll continue reading, it’s how schools teach it in sociology class. I didn’t make the rubric, I just got suspended for questioning it.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                Wait, by “defending it” do you mean “defending my assertion that this is what they’re teaching kids in school?” If yes; because that’s true. If by “defending it” you mean “agreeing with the sociologists,” well, “I’m not, I haven’t done that one time, as I’ve repeatedly said.”

                What exactly are you arguing with me about, the fact that sociologists say it, or your incorrect perception that I agree with the people I keep saying I disagree with?

            • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              But this isn’t a sociology class? It’s not even a sociology forum. Words can have different meanings and connotations in different contexts. The academic definition of a word does not automatically trump the colloquial definition, especially not in non-academic circumstances.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Racism can be against any group of people that are from a certain area or ethnic group power has 0 meaning for that.

          And I know that many people in the US have some mental problems regarding political words and meanings.

          Everone can be racists, Latinos and Black people are racists against each other in USA they also tend to be racist against Jewish people.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Unfortunately according to sociologists that is not true, those people would be “prejudice” but not “racist” with the only difference being “power.”

            I was suspended for arguing against it, they seem dead set on this semantic argument.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              “They” want a free pass to be racist to others and a shield from it themselves. “They” are hypocrites.

              The idiots who think equality means “fuck the dealer” should stick to playing spades.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                …who’s “they?” Sociologists aren’t a homogenous group, some are racial or ethnic minorities, some are racial or ethnic majorities. Both my teachers were white men.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Oh no, sociologists! Good thing they’re a hivemind, and all have the same opinion on definitions.

          If your argument is that you’re using the wrong word which ultimately means the same thing, then it’s not much of an argument. It’s pretty clear you’re trying to downplay racism to be more acceptable

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Well, every one I’ve talked to agreed with all the other ones on this matter, so again I say take it up with them, not the guy who disagrees with it who told you what their consensus on the matter is. Shoot the messenger much?

            My argument is actually that sociology classes teach it, call your local school board and complain, I’m not in the education system, I can do exactly fuck all about it, like I said when I tried to argue I got suspended (and on top of that got my 360 taken away for a month for being suspended no less!) Trust me I’m on your side, your beef is with academia who are the people pushing the narrative. What, do you think I registered sociologydefinitions.zip or whatever that site was? Really?

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                It’s the sociology department of academia pushing it, not me. I merely said “well in school they taught me this” (and “I got in trouble for fighting it” no less) and now we’re here, calm down. If anything you should be outraged this is what they’re teaching in sociology classes in America, not mad that I told you this is what they’re teaching in sociology classes in America.

                In fact, find me one time in this thread I “defended” their claims. I believe you’ll find that not one time did that occur, I repeatedly said shit like “hey I agree, but sociology teachers would be mad at both of us, because like I say they kicked me out for sharing your opinion.” Quite clearly I hold the same opinion as you, so I guess we’re both defending racism then.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah Islam isn’t a race either. It is a religion. And what point are you trying to make exactly? It sounds like you’re mad that I asked what race German is. What race are you then, American?

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    It doesn’t matter their political system or economic alignment, authoritarians always look for unproven or racist ideas to divide others away from themselves. It doesn’t matter what race or for which political idea, racism is always bad and corrupts all ideas.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s easier than accepting that all people are capable of good and evil. It’s so easy to decide villains are born that way because then the targets are easy and you’re definitely a good person.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      You’ve likely interested with some of their terminally-online dungeon denizens before. They have authoritarian takes that would embarrass fascists, but they call everyone else Nazis. Truly a special and unique crowd over there.

    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Probably best to add it to your instance blocklist now and nip that shit in the bud before you do.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        They actually have some reasonable people though so I don’t see a need to block the entire instance. (They know Linux, self hosting and privacy pretty well.)

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          I thought hexbear defederated from world

          I know they defederated from SJW, oh man, it was hilarious. They were all hyping themselves up that they have an entire ocean to dunk with and then they lost their safespace and they quickly folded. It didn’t even last a day before they admitted defeat and ran back to their safespace.

          • Klear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Huh. I never realised sh.itjust.works kinda shares an acronym with Social Justice Warriors. I think I’d prefer SIW given how it’s punctuated, but SJW does indeed work too.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    If I pay someone to do a sex crime to me, do I get in trouble or spare them the trouble?

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    They’re being ironic and edgy. Probably.

    The question is only whether you consider ironic racism (in this case mocking 19th and 20th century “race science” with reversals of focus) to be racism regardless.

    I don’t think so, but there’s also always elements of Poe’s Law to consider. Not to mention that, for example, British and American racists literally said these things unironically about Germans, reaching fever pitches in WW1.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      You should look at US WWII propaganda cartoons. It is very “interesting”

      During that time the US rounded up all Asians and put them in internment camps for “there own safety.” Let’s just say they didn’t feel very safe living in a prison. I actually knew someone who grew up in one of the internment camps. She didn’t want to talk about the experience so I’m assuming it was unpleasant.

      Long story short is that no country is free from the danger of race theory.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        During that time the US rounded up all Asians and put them in internment camps for “there own safety.”

        Japanese-Americans only. Chinese-Americans were actually highly praised by US propaganda of the time.

        Racism is arbitrary and insane.

    • Zomg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      We all know words can’t really express sarcasm or other underlying feelings or meanings very clearly. Without a /s your only able to assume if the they did or didn’t actually mean that.

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        So what’s the joke? Are they’re pretending to be racist without the topic (rammstein) ever mentioning race to begin with?

        I don’t buy that. ‘Please excuse me. I’m just going to be sarcastically racist without anyone previously mentioning race!’ – It’s straight out of the alt-right playbook; when called out, claim it’s a sarcastic, ironic joke!

        • Zomg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          No clue, could be either. It’s text on a screen and the only emotion present, is the one you decide to apply to it.

          Ask them if it was a joke or not to be sure, and if you have to ask, it’s because it might not be.

          • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Sounds like you’re going to lengths to defend this behaviour or to differentiate it.

            No apologia is allowed

            • Zomg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Actually no, the hexbear comment is clearly bad in my opinion, regardless of if it was sarcasm.

              • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                Good, I’m glad you can agree it’s bad. You have to be very vigilant against the alt-right playbook—no defending sarcasm or if it’s a joke.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Right, but there’s enough social context going on to generally assume that stans for the philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles probably don’t actually consider Germans a form of untermensch.

        • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Most of them aren’t actual Marxists, that’s a facade for them to spread disinformation and divisive content.

        • Zomg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          That’s a fair point, id just consider that as an inside joke I guess.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      If you say any group of people are prone to rape because of their brains, then that is racist.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            That is one of the traditional meanings of blackface, yes.

            It’s also clear that the intended meaning of the act is innately critical of that mentality.

            If you disagree that it is acceptable that’s valid but ignoring that the act was at least an attempt at well intentioned criticism is just dishonest.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Of fucking course you’re here with a heaping helping of terrible opinions.

              Thanks for sharing, but my doctor said I should avoid false-pretenses used to destroy honest discussion.

            • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              25 days ago

              Though seriously, in Tropic Thunder, Kirk Lazarus is a satirical character whose method of acting goes to such lengths that it becomes offensive, hence why he’s in blackface.

              Like it’s supposed to be offensive, that’s the entire point. It’s satirising the film industry’s portrayal of war and the actors in the industry. They even point this out in the film itself, lol, it’s a key part of it.

              Using satire to back up your deflection unironically is certainly… something. Haven’t seen that before. But the original post has no satire, punchline, or even anything witty. It’s just plain racism.