Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agostoplocklemmy.caexternal-linkmessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1612arrow-down1192
arrow-up1420arrow-down1external-linkstoplocklemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·4 months ago alot Do notional creatures count?
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 months ago“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic. No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·4 months ago No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly. So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
minus-squareAurenkin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoI would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·4 months agoPigs are delicious tho
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 months agoOf course, they are very important!
Do notional creatures count?
“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic.
No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
There are exceptions.
Maybe for you
Pigs are delicious tho
Of course, they are very important!