• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    (just a hobby, won’t be big and professional like gnu)

    Aged like fine milk. Looking at you, GNU Hurd.

    • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      GNU Hurd didn’t take a good path of development following MACH design. But I still think GNU Hurd is the kernel of the future. Probably the Next generation Hurd. Just because GNU MACH and Hurd present very convoluted designs.

      A kernel that performs most of their activities in user space and that it is truly modular looks very promising for the kind of systems we have nowadays and in the future.

      Someone has to make the change, or we will stagnate in cumbersome and up featured systems.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s no guessing what will catch the world by storm. At a party once, Bram Cohen tried to get me interested in his ideas for a a peer-to-peer protocol, and I thought nothing of it.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My cousin’s buddies asked him to build the website for their new ride hailing app but he didn’t feel like doing some rinky dink thing, apparently Travis and them took it in stride though.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I for one really appreciate the effort of supporting non-AT drives despite the initial skepticism.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you except Google co-opting Linux to create the most terrible dystopian mobile surveillance platform ever to come this close to 1984, Microsoft co-opting it to pretend they like open-source and broaden the reach of their closed-source crap, and sonsabitches like Redhat, amazingly it mostly still is.

        • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          While Microsoft and Google merely pretend to like open source but transparently hate it, it is (was) not quite as obvious that red hat wanted to capture the enterprise Linux market wholesale. What red hat has done is terrible for the ecosystem, much more so than Microsoft just throwing out worthless tokens of appreciation.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You people are hilarious. Red Hat provides more GPL code than any company I can think of. Half of what people call GNU has Red Hat as the largest contributor.

            Feels before reals.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you don’t like what they are doing with Linux, because it is free and open source, participate in people that are using it in ways that you do like that they do it, or do it yourself.

        There is nothing stopping you

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Azure don’t give a shit what it runs. Windows is on its own these days; if they succeed, good for them, but honestly I think the days of Microsoft just pretending to give a shit about Linux are long gone; it’s an important OS to them too.

        I’ve worked for Microsoft for 12 years, still have lots of friends there so I get some of the vibe from that.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Uh, Android is the alternative to Apple’s iOS. Android is much more customizable.

            • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Think Different™ (Because we deprecated the service you liked and depended on because an internal team was jockeying for a higher position and rewrote what you loved but worse, so actually you are thinking different every year!)

  • vu2tum@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Just a hobby, won’t be big” - he really didn’t think it will be one of the most sought after projects.

  • pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just look at those nested parentheses. A true sign of (pedantic) greatness, when a person needs to clarify something in their earlier clarification.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some of those parens could’ve been replaced with commas and retain their meaning (that’s what I do to avoid nesting, so that it doesn’t get confusing).

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve never seen that being used, but it seems it’s a thing in English. What if you wanna best deeper? Do you go {}? Then <>? «»?

          • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not really an English thing so much as a math thing that makes too much sense to not use elsewhere. For instance, in math you might have x[3 - 7{3y + (a * b)}]. I haven’t actually seen them go deeper than three sets, though, so I’m not sure what would be next.

            • ElTacoEsMiPastor@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.

              so when bp = 300x - 3, this:

              4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

              would turn to

              4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

              perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though

              just picture it:

              4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Not as good as my other primary languages, I have to admit. Finnish has too many consonants for my taste.

      • sramder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had a teacher that screamed at me for “taking the lords name in vain…” They’re definitely wrong from time-to-time ;-)

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I love it™ (The nested parentheses are one of the greatest tools known to mankind (And to all other creatures))

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have been stopping myself from using those and instead restructure my sentence. But if people like it, guess I can start keeping it.

        I do find it more useful, however, to have a kind of a reference to the thing written at the end instead [1], but markdown doesn’t seem to have anything for that, and using the syntax for Markdown references, is only useful for hyperlinks, or if the reader is willing to read the hover text 2.

        [1]: Like This. I would love it if the markdown viewer would link the above [1] to this line. Maybe with a scrolldown effect.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And automatically numbered too! Nice.

            Though for me, instead of a scrolldown effect, it reloads the page on clicking the link. Trying a second time, it does the scrolldown properly. Weird
            But that’s just an implementation detail and as long as this is standard, I’ll just start using it.

            Thanks

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well ain’t that some shit. It would make my comments more readable to a degree[1]. I also like how they have return links for when you have some monster text wall that nobody would ever read in the first place on this platform.


            1. not that I’d ever use it ↩︎

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The amount of effort I do to try and avoid using double parentesis is trully herculean.

      I think that stuff is the product of a completionist/perfectionist mindset - as one is writting, important details/context related to the main train of thought pop-up in one’s mind and as one is writting those, important details/context related to the other details/context pop-up in one’s mind (and the tendency is to keep going down the rabbit hole of details/context on details/context).

      You get this very noticeably with people who during a conversation go out on a tangent and often even end up losing the train of thought of the main conversation (a tendecy I definitelly have) since one doesn’t get a chance to go back and re-read, reorganise and correct during a spoken conversation.

      Personally I don’t think it’s an actual quality (sorry to all upvoters) as it indicates a disorganised mind. It is however the kind of thing one overcomes with experience and I bet Mr Torvalds himself is mostly beyond it by now.

    • Elise@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Congratulations you’ve just unlocked midlife crisis. You can now wear sunglasses inside and shop at camp david.

          • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That kind of depends on how you define FOSS. The way we think of that today was in very early stages back in the 1991 and the orignal source was distributed as free, both as in speech and as in beer, but commercial use was prohibited, so it doesn’t strictly speaking qualify as FOSS (like we understand it today). About a year later Linux was released under GPL and the rest is history.

            Public domain code, academic world with any source code and things like that predate both Linux and GNU by a few decades and even the Free Software Foundation came 5-6 years before Linux, but the Linux itself has been pretty much as free as it is today from the start. GPL, GNU, FSF and all the things Stallman created or was a part of (regardless of his conflicting personality) just created a set of rules on how to play this game, pretty much before any game or rules for it existed.

            Minix was a commercial thing from the start, Linux wasn’t, and things just refined on the way. You are of course correct that the first release of Linux wasn’t strictly speaking FOSS, but the whole ‘FOSS’ mentality and rules for it wasn’t really a thing either back then.

            There’s of course adacemic debate to have for days on which came first and what rules whoever did obey and what release counts as FOSS or not, but for all intents and purposes, Linux was free software from the start and the competition was not.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I read a biography of Stallman several years ago. The whole free software movement was an attempt to preserve the early hacker culture where everybody freely swapped code. So, Stallman didn’t really “invent” FOSS; he just codified that early hacker ethos.

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Agree with you up until “the competition was not”.

              GNU HURD was competition for one thing.

              More importantly, so was BSD. BSD predates Linux ( though its distribution specifically as FreeBSD does not ).

              • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve read Linus’s book several years ago, and based on that flimsy knowledge on back of my head, I don’t think Linus was really competing with anyone at the time. Hurd was around, but it’s still coming soon™ to widespread use and things with AT&T and BSD were “a bit” complex at the time.

                BSD obviously has brought a ton of stuff on the table which Linux greatly benefited from and their stance on FOSS shouldn’t go without appreciation, but assuming my history knowledge isn’t too badly flawed, BSD and Linux weren’t straight competitors, but they started to gain traction (regardless of a lot longer history with BSD) around the same time and they grew stronger together instead of competing with eachother.

                A ton of us owes our current corporate lifes to the people who built the stepping stones before us, and Linus is no different. Obviously I personally owe Linus a ton for enabling my current status at the office, but the whole thing wouldn’t been possible without people coming before him. RMS and GNU movement plays a big part of that, but equally big part is played by a ton of other people.

                I’m not an expert by any stretch on history of Linux/Unix, but I’m glad that the people preceding my career did what they did. Covering all the bases on the topic would require a ton more than I can spit out on a platform like this, I’m just happy that we have the FOSS movement at all instead of everything being a walled garden today.

                • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  386BSD was not available until some months after Linux was released, so you had GNU with no working kernel and BSD not yet available on the hardware he had, hardware a lot of normal people had. I think the GPL also felt more philosophically right to many of them, and it limited how much they needed to re-do work that someone else had already done but kept secret.

                  The AT&T lawsuit definitely hampered BSD growth just as it was ported to the 386, but it was filed after Linux was already a thing.

        • A Basil Plant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10754

          MINIX originally was developed in 1987 by Andrew S. Tanenbaum as a teaching tool for his textbook Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Today, it is a text-oriented operating system with a kernel of less than 6,000 lines of code. MINIX’s largest claim to fame is as an example of a microkernel, in which each device driver runs as an isolated user-mode process—a structure that not only increases security but also reliability, because it means a bug in a driver cannot bring down the entire system.

          In its heyday during the early 1990s, MINIX was popular among hobbyists and developers because of its inexpensive proprietary license. However, by the time it was licensed under a BSD-style license in 2000, MINIX had been overshadowed by other free-licensed operating systems.

          Today, MINIX is best known as a footnote in GNU/Linux history. It inspired Linus Torvalds to develop Linux, and some of his early work was written on MINIX. Probably too, Torvalds’ early decision to support the MINIX filesystem is responsible for the Linux kernel’s support of almost every filesystem imaginable.

          Later, Torvalds and Tanenbaum had a frank e-mail debate about the relative merits of macrokernels and microkernels. This early history resurfaced in 2004 when Kenneth Brown of the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution prepared a book alleging that Torvalds borrowed code from MINIX—a charge that Tanenbaum, among others, so comprehensively debunked, and the book was never actually published (see Resources).

          See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum–Torvalds_debate

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          A microkernel teaching OS by Andrew S. Tanenbaum.

          In 2017 the world (including Tanenbaum) found out that the Intel Management Engine uses Minix internally. Intel just kind of did that silently. So Minix is still around.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. And I like how even from the message it shows that it’s been already well recognized by then.

      If I recall correctly from some RMS’ talks I’ve seen many years ago, they’ve been working on it for years before, it’s just the kernel that was missing. As I see it, GNU and Linux was the breakthrough for FLOSS, since at that time you would still have to use a proprietary kernel. (Well, there’s GNU Hurd, but I’m not sure if it existed at that time, and even if it did, it was not ready.)

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah… but it was just RMS yelling at people from a street corner, nobody actually used it until Linux came along ;-)

      • pelya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m pretty sure Apple and Google already rewritten all important GNU parts into something with Apache or BSD license, to throw everything GPL licensed out of their embedded systems. The biggest and most important part was obviously GCC, replaced by Clang.

        How many GPL-licensed system libraries and tools are in Android right now, except for the kernel? I’m pretty sure the answer is zero.

        • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Clang and the LLVM with BSD like licences so we can get the 80’s suing experience of UNIX yet again.

          It’s impressive how many people in the FOSS community hate GNU. Even to the point of creating OSes without GNU in it. Working for free for companies just to get their contributions stolen or expunged.

          Apple loves Open Source, they can stole it as they like, like they did with Darwin (a derivation of XNU). Everything is open until we no longer want to, and you don’t have any right to desist such actions. This sounds like a dream for them.

          Google loves Open Source, they can build an spyware, ad vending machine, DRM platform that is hosted in almost any IOT machine. This is Android.

          The community has to realize that if you care about your software you have to ENFORCE the freedom of it.

          The are entire projects just to liberate android from google. That’s is all fault of the open source licence.

          There are quite a lot of projects which exist to liberate software projects that have been taken hostage. This is no sense.

          Most of the IOT devices are presenting paywall features thanks to Android: cars, fridges, TVs, etc. What is next?

          • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            XNU is the kernel in Darwin, XNU is an Apple product derived from BSD and Mach. Darwin has a lot of FreeBSD in it.

            Apple shares that code though. It’s on GitHub. There used to be Darwin distributions.

            Your Android example doesn’t make very much sense either. The largest Android issues are typically hardware lockdown. Nothing about the GPL prevents someone building an ad platform that spies on you, it just makes them share the source code for it. Google’s licensing choices means they don’t share the source code for the Google pieces they put on top of AOSP, the entire project means people can build the alternatives though.

            The lawsuits were about AT&Ts proprietary license. BSD and similar licenses are not that.

            • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              BSD licence allowed to work with the AT&T licence which at the end generated all the drama. Unix wars.

              Again BSD is great if you don’t care about what will happen with your code.

              Yeah the Android point doesn’t have any sense, that’s right.

              Apple shares the code of the parts they want. Since it’s not a copyleft licence, then they can still ship you a version of Darwin + privative code as your macOs without sharing the entire code. So you end running kind of Frankenstein program with parts you don’t know what they do.

              AOSP is not a great licence because it allows Google benefit from contributions, but then it has tons of privative software on top. So basically contributing to the AOSP means that you improve the code that later it’s used in combination with privative one.

              My point is that libre source code should enforce that derivations of it stay libre. Otherwise you are working for free for companies that don’t care about the users.

              Hey for companies is a good point. The best system for them is open source. It makes sense for them to use it. And open source is much better than just privative.

              From the point of view of the individual user and developer is not that great. It kind of hooks you in because it has open source parts, but you are probably unaware of all the closed source stuff that runs in combination with it.

              I get the open source point, but I don’t find it fair at the long term for the individual developer and user.

              Over the years I’ve become convinced that the BSD license is great for code you don’t care about. I’ll use it myself. If there’s a library routine that I just want to say ‘hey, this is useful to anybody and I’m not going to maintain this,’ I’ll put it under the BSD license.

              Linus Torvals at LinuxCon 2016

        • sramder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, gotta’ love how all the Apple fanboys were like Bash? Meh’ zsh is the superior shell in the span of a day.

          I mean was the GPL viral… yeah probably. But it’s not like the courts came after either of them. Or ever really will in a meaningful way. Although hope springs eternal for non-webkit browsers in the not-EU 😌

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Funny how he made it basically for his desktop computer.

    33 years ago, and Linux is dominating in every part of the OS world except … the desktop.

    (I’m paraphrasing his quote – he said something like this years ago, can’t find it, though.)

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I would argue that it does dominate the desktop now as well, just not by usage numbers.

      If I was told I had to use a windows desktop these days at home I think I’d start investing in a very large book collection.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Without a distro to rally behind I’m personally somewhat skeptical. Ubuntu was the best shot we had but since switching everything over to SNAPs it’s on the slow side. With the number of Windows ads and early end of support for Windows 10 there’s a real opportunity for desktop Linux, but until there’s a well supported distro that genuinely doesn’t require using the terminal I can’t see there being mass adoption.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not about the distro. Most distros out right now are pretty good. What you need is hardware that lots of people want to buy with Linux installed on it as the default choice. Normal people don’t want to install any OS, be it Linux, Windows, MacOS or BSD. Whatever comes by default, it’s good.

          I’m pretty sure that right now the most popular Linux distros are ChromeOS and SteamOS. I wonder why

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Any distro that ships KDE/Plasma as its default desktop should do the trick. I’m not personally using it right now but I hear OpenSUSE Tumbleweed is kicking a lot of rear end lately.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          My grandmother ran Linux for a couple decades until her death at 101 years old. My 80+ year old mom has been running Linux for at least 2 decades. Yes, I’m tech support, but I don’t really have to do anything. It just works.

          • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And I’m cracking up at the scammers phoning up my 85 year old father telling him his Windows has been compromised on his Linux desktop.

      • netvor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I was thinking of a quote that was much more similar to what I wrote (and it’s not in the video you linked).

        I had such a trouble finding it that I’m starting to feel like it might be one of those “quotes” where the credited author never really said that, but I haven’t completely given up :D

        Here’s one closer to what I paraphrased (but not quite it)–quoting an article from cio.com

        While Linux pretty much dominates almost every walk of our lives, even on the consumer devices like smartphones and smart TVs, it has not had the same success on the desktop. What does Torvalds think about it? Is Linux a failure on the desktop? Not really. “The desktop hasn’t really taken over the world like Linux has in many other areas, but just looking at my own use, my desktop looks so much better than I ever could have imagined. Despite the fact that I’m known for sometimes not being very polite to some of the desktop UI people, because I want to get my work done. Pretty is not my primary thing. I actually am very happy with the Linux desktop, and I started the project for my own needs, and my needs are very much fulfilled. That’s why, to me, it’s not a failure. I would obviously love for Linux to take over that world too, but it turns out it’s a really hard area to enter. I’m still working on it. It’s been 25 years. I can do this for another 25. I’ll wear them down.”

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That post changed my life, gave me a great hobby, which became a career, and still puts food on the table for me and my family to this day. Thank you, Linus.