• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is not just a partisan issue. As the article points out, its been like this for 30 years. The Dems failed to pass any meaningful legislation too.

    It’s because it makes gobs of money that both parties are taking, and it also kind of projects US power to other countries since US tech is doing most of the data collection.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only Dem I know who even bothers to talk about this stuff is our local senator Ron Wyden. Apart from that, most seem satisfied with the status quo.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It just doesn’t resonate with voters.

        I think many voters “feel” tech getting junky, but the connection to why is just way too complicated for most to dig into. It’s not a direct line like tipping waiters or getting abortions.

    • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      the dems failed to pass any meaningful legislation

      Yeah those tens of millions of people utilizing the ACA sure don’t count. I guess the infrastructure bill didn’t happen, I’ll go tell my city to return the funding it’s using right now to repair roads and sewerage issues that have long been neglected until that money came.

      I mean seriously? Nothing meaningful? Let’s just skip the part where you give me some dross about how the ACA was Republican due to compromise blah blah blah we all know but it wouldn’t exist at all without Obama and the democrats expending an enormous amount of political capital. Like it or not, to not call it meaningful is ridiculous.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Relax bidey-bro, this thread is about data privacy laws, not general stuff. The only relevant one I’m aware of is DMCA, which was in fact signed into law by Bill Clinton.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              As if surrounding yourself in an echo chamber of sycophants is the better solution. It sure works well for MAGA folks.

              • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s unbelievable how any time somebody starts complaining about “echo chambers“ it’s basically an argument for how they are entitled to somebody else’s attention.

                When you go out for drinks or dinner or some other social activity, do you always make sure to invite people with beliefs and practices that are diametrically opposed to your own? Do you not mostly keep friends in your orbit who largely agree with you and your values?

                I have family I don’t agree with. I have colleagues I don’t agree with. Yes, I also have friends I don’t agree with. But these echo chamber arguments are almost exclusively used by the right to say “you have to listen to me because it’s a moral imperative” then whenever someone like me tries to show them the door, they scream about echo chambers as if they aren’t the problem.

                No, we don’t have to keep these people around. I don’t have to listen to every opinion or argument that I disagree with every single time. Sometimes I’m just going to tell people to fuck off and hang out with people who aren’t actively trying to upset me.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Great analogy but how does that even remotely apply to this scenario where you replied to someone else’s comment and then didn’t like the response followed by someone telling you to just block people when they aren’t part of your in-group of folks who think exactly like you?

                  This is social media not a dinner party and this is exactly how people wind up in social media echo chambers.

                  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    I can decide to block someone after they reveal more of themselves or otherwise turn nasty. You’re still reinforcing a false moral imperative. I am allowed to have communities and spaces that are primarily people I agree with. I don’t need everything to be challenging me all the time.

                • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I’m with Shepard on this one, even if he’s being a jerk about it.

                  Lemmy is a filter bubble, an echo chamber. You miss information that would be personally important to you, but is excluded because it doesn’t fit with the US Democrat party line, and the very specific part of it Lemmy’s politically active base likes.

                  Like, I’m a raging Trump hater, but I’m kind of aghast at how many knee jerk reactions (like, to me, your original reply) I get when I imply something vaguely critical about the Democrats.

                  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    If you spend your entire time and get all your information on lemmy then you have a bigger issue beyond some echo chamber internet communities. Really and truly.

                    Demonizing spaces for like minded people to congregate doesn’t solve that.