Edit:

The poll stopped me in my tracks but it’s actually even worse.

It should not take this long to get to imdb

Edit2: didn’t even realize it thinks I’ll “love it” based on things I look up. I don’t think I’d like it.

Edit³: IMDb was the example I used without thinking. I’m aware that there’s a link to it in the top card. It’s the other web results that I don’t already know about that I’d like to see. I now know there’s a hidden “web” tab. There’s also https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example` but it’s still mildly infuriating that you have to know about these things to get the basic results we expected for years.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But this genuinely feels sensible?

    The generated abstract includes the commonly needed links - including the IMDB you want and Rotten Tomatoes that I frequently want - and the very first result after that is Wikipedia for when you need that.

    It’s like the best abstraction so you don’t have to wade through results, correctly understanding that if you search by just the title, you probably want information of through-links to common information/review sites.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They took it too far. A few cards can be convenient (though I feel bad for site runners) but the poll?

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry, Google is actually getting sued for its various malpractices (paying browsers millions to be their default search engine, Google adsense putting the best bidder at the top of the search results, etc). It might even come to the US justice system ordering the breakup of various Google products into smaller independent companies.

  • Bianca_0089@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Seeing only four to six results per scroll seems a bit cramped. I miss the early 2000s when you’d get like 15 or 20 search results per scroll on a tiny 1280 monitor.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be fair. All the information for the movie is right there at the top. If you wanted just info about the movie.

    The poll though… Ya… That’s kinda crazy.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’d think that if you knew the answer to the poll question, you wouldn’t have Googled the title of the movie. I just don’t understand the thought process that led to this happening.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      all of us ‘you cant keep relying on corporations, they will betray you, every single corporate product you consume is basically the one ring’ open source nerds get to say the MOST satisfying “I told you so”'s. nobody cares, of course, you’ll all keep using this shit, but it feels SO good.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        open source nerds need to keep their fucking mouths shut until they deliver a end-user grade linux distro.

        It’s been 25 fuckdamn years already…

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean, we do, and there are different philosophies of computing that have different effects on users, and the philosophy that users should be infantilized and USED instead of grown and nurtured as peddled by shit heads like steve jobs is exemplified by all the enshittification currently dominating every single thing you’ve bought in the last decade that had so much as an RFID chip in it.

          but also, it would be great if windows would deliver an end user grade windows distro. i miss those.

          the point is, these corporate products are not usable, they are not stable, and they are not a good long term decision. any business that uses these is unbelievably stupid and deserves to get crowdstruck. the fact that the instability is political and your shit can just be bricked remotely on zero notice rather than due to being difficult to configure is not a point in their favor.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              yes, im a linux cultist who was really sad when windows 7 stopped getting updates.

              instability is instability. you don’t make a factory in a politically unstable place, and you don’t use a product from a for-profit company that is prone to enshittification and could remotely brick it at any point without warning. risks are risks.

  • sudneo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I continue to be one of the happiest customers for Kagi, a service that I am so happy to pay (for my family as well).

    To be clear, there are some widgets that might be useful in some cases, but it should not be all you see (and it should definitely not include similar stuff as if the focus for any search is just to find more stuff to consume and please advertisers…).

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am not a fan of some of his ideas either, especially the ones tending towards libertarianism. Some other ideas instead are quite decent, like how he thinks companies should give back to the community. He also built a tech company without VC funding and with a good share of ownership for workers (which I think is nice), without any marketing (which I despise as industry) and generally without the predatory nature that 98% of tech companies have nowadays.

        I am sure you are referring to the Brave debacle of months back, and FWIW, I agree with his position on that particular issue. Anyway, considering that I have no ideas about the positions for the CEOs/founders of the alternatives, I think it’s still a very worthy compromise to have a good product (incl. nonfunctional qualities like privacy, ecological impact etc.).

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Getting 670k from a few private investors aint vc?

          I havent heard about the brave debacle but some other comments ive seen make me really not trust this ceo

    • Tinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      100% agree. I’ve been using Kagi for a bit over a month now and I love it. My one and only complaint is business hours can be harder to find - I have to actually click into their website for it. That’s it though! Everything else is dramatically less painful in my opinion. I don’t need business hours frequently enough for it to matter though, and if needed I can use Google for that one thing.

      Kagi has been a breath of fresh air

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Completely agree, I started seeing business hours popping up lately, I know that they know it’s an area of improvement.

        It’s a premium service but it has very nice features and is a good product overall.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use kagi as well and love it. Worth every dime.

      People that say they can’t see themselves paying for Search underestimate the value of clean high quality search results.

      I’m a business owner and developer of firmware for esoteric products. I need high quality, powerful searches that don’t waste my time. Kagi is great for that. I created lenses on Kagi that I can use to focus my searches, a great time saver for me.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Probably, luckily I had no interest in watching it and looked it up for other reasons.

  • NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tbf there’s a link to imdb on the first image

    Yeah I usually like the Google boxes in search results, but this is so excessive. Everything after and including the polls is just completely unnecessary

  • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn the second image in your post didn’t load for me and it turned my Connect into an infinite grey screen

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man, I hate people like you, because I am constantly reminded of how I really need to get round to checking out Searx, but I never get round to it.

      (I am joking, because the only person who is putting pressure on me about this is me, and that’s because finding time to do this is something I want to do. Thank you for reminding me, even if I will keep procrastinating)

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        NGL, it’s a pain in the ass to get it done the first time.

        Docker -> Cloudflare is a lot of learning if you don’t already have the skillset.

        And it does have issues on locale based searches, when meta searches do geo lookups, you end up on partner nodes.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The info cards are a cancer on the internet. They exist only so you stay on Google’s page and don’t follow a link to another site.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They exist only so you stay on Google’s page and don’t follow a link to another site.

        That may be true, but I’d say in the neighborhood of 1/3 - 1/2 of my searches are answered by auto-compiled info cards or similar artifacts.

        Just by way of example, my wife and I were casually researching cars lately, and one of the criteria is “does the damn thing fit in our garage??” Typing “Mazda CX-9 length” and having that specific info presented immediately is immensely preferable to clicking into edmonds.com and scrolling through an entire table of specifications.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn. I switched to DDG like well over a year ago and thought I was just kind of putting up with it for the sake of privacy. Turns out I didn’t know how good I have it

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      DDG is moving into the same direction. I had to use ublock to hide the news block that appears when I’m searching for a movie/show in order to avoid spoilers.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        In fact this was one of the key features lauded about DDG in its early days, the “instant result”-boxes.

        Google kinda only went hard on them afterwards, probably seeing a good idea over at DDG because for the vast majority of people, they’re looking for answers and results, not specifically objects of type link-to-search-result. They don’t need a list of links, so long as the information they were after is reliably in those generated cards.

        See OP wanting an IMDB link, which is directly there as Google correctly assumed that’s a very very very common use case for googling the name of a movie.

    • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly. I’ve been using DDG for years now and when I have to use Google search for whatever reason, I am quickly reminded how crap ggl is.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I just wish DDG would finally kill their Apple Maps. Over here they’re so incredibly unusable it’s just not funny any more. I’ll take here maps before that POS.

        It’s so bad that on desktop, you can’t even go and click on alternative elements on the map without explicitly changing your search terms to them. You see them, but they’re non-interactive. So the incredibly common case “I remember the name of the restaurant next to this place” (or something similar) cannot be done on DDG, on account of getting Apple money to include their maps.

    • hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It shouldn’t take this long to get to imdb

      In case anyone here isn’t aware, you can directly search IMDB from DuckDuckGo by using the bang !imdb.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had the identical reaction. Thanks OP for posting this repellent screenshot. So glad I changed my defaults.