![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f242f4b2-7782-48c9-8594-05882e557e7e.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/c0ed0a36-2496-4b4d-ac77-7d2fd7f2b5b7.png)
In which case you could also go right-click -> properties -> security -> advanced -> click change where it lists the owner.
It’s not as quick but hey, mouse-driven UI exists.
The strength of life to face oneself has been made manifest. The persona Carighan has appeared.
In which case you could also go right-click -> properties -> security -> advanced -> click change where it lists the owner.
It’s not as quick but hey, mouse-driven UI exists.
Yeah like, complain about the one thing MS is finally improving in recent years, clamping down on non-admin users and non-admin permissions.
It is if you don’t get pay to run, getting anywhere faster doesn’t help you at all, and it costs more energy. And you gain nothing from it. That’s my point.
Hrm, you’re not wrong but Hades also exemplifies why quality wins over quantity when in replayability.
These people don’t get to pick whether they use Excel, either. They have to, they just want to get their job done and go home, too.
They don’t get paid to walk upright, basically. So why do it just so someone else can buy another yacht?
Hrm, I would argue that if your update gets in the way of productivity on the user side, then it’s actually worse, not better.
Sure, in a vacuum it might be superior, but that is now what is happening.
We used to rail against our users always wanting an Excel like view for everything, but when you observe them working to understand their work flow it makes sense. They use excel the other 75%of the day, we’re the one breaking their mental flow and ruining their productivity.
That’s because it’s your username. To you it shows normal, all I see is hunter12. See?
Yeah it automatically obfuscates. Mine is *******, for example.
Relax, it’s just JSON. If you wanted to not be stringly-typed, you’d have not used JSON.
(though to be fair, I hate it when people do bullshit types, but they got a point in that you ought to not use JSON in the first place if it matters)
No but my sub has been reaaaaaallyyyy bad! 😈
This is their “light IDE” basically, the equivalent of VS Code. Their Java IDE is the full thing, well, Eclipse. Although I personally prefer IntelliJ IDEA.
I don’t really need another text editor, sorry.
This is depressingly accurate. 😓
Also the strip stops midway through as Waterfall was an invented thing just for a paper. And during your UP work you actually had the customer put in that input and hence it was like in this cartoon strip.
I’m doing my part! 💪
Yeah I do. I disagree with most of their posts, but I agree with the motion that using the same labels indiscriminately is a problem in online discourse.
For example, far as I know so far, I’d call him a pedo, but I am unsure whether I’d call him a predator (of course, language differences apply, too). That’s just because I need words to express the predatory nature of people like Maxwell who prey on teens and YA.
That’s kinda what I meant, there’s too few words to just use the same label across the board sometimes. Doesn’t make something someone does less reprehensible. Rather i prefer to sometimes use full sentences instead of quick labels because it more accurately expresses the matter.
I did not disagree with that, so I’m not sure what you’re on about.
Yeah that’s a fair take.
It is reprehensible and disgusting behavior, but it doesn’t mean we should universally apply labels across vast swaths of different issues, as it devalues said label and poisons future discussion.
Simple labels simplify discussion of course, but that runs the risk of losing nuance for the specific way someone was a disgusting creep.
Because it keeps being crossposted everywhere. Sadly.
Why not? Genuine question, what about it made you not enjoy it? Did it end up feeling too easy?