• credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve actually thought of this as a new dating service. Too bad I’m lazy.

    Get after it someone who needs an SO.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Oh to be young, back when the world was simple.

      When you’ve got 2 kids that go to bed between half an hour and an hour before you and every other night you can use it for watching a movie or a tv show, how much of that time do you want to spend cruising 5 streaming platforms to pick a movie? That’s easily a half hour wasted.

      Instead, as we alternate putting kids to bed, the awake parent could be screening movies and match from the previous day review. Meaning we could spend our time actually WATCHING said movie.

      We can talk when the kids are awake, but we cannot flip through the Netflix catalog at the same time. Either kids are watching the TV or we don’t want them watching the TV, in either case you can’t use the TV.

      Edit:

      Go one step further and allow a spouse to preselect from movies and TV currently being watched they would watch for tonight and I will pay for a subscription!

  • sneaky@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Somebody somewhere is about to make so much money. Shoulda learned how to program.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Vibe coding is useful for bashing out simple, stupid ideas that have been done millions of times before. APIs to do SOMETHING with a movie database has been done millions of times before. Tinderlike swiping interfaces have been done millions of times before.

        There isn’t going to be much nuance to creating this software. so it’s something that can be fairly easy for an AI to churn out the code for, and get the functionality working and give to people.

        Not sure where you got human connection or whatever from this.

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Human connection is actually the basic premise of the original post. I’m just being salty because I resent having to constantly fix the shite that lazy cunts vibe code, but yes, it’s not an obvious join and I’d probably had a drink

  • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    on letterboxd you can filter a user’s watchlist for matches in your own or filter out stuff you’ve already seen. handy.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just have a massive list of movies and shows I want to watch, and I run it by my wife. She usually just tells me to pick one. Then the burden is mine again.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let me introduce you to shuf | head 1. This is literally what picks the next movie for us. If either of us are unhappy, we just remove the movie from the list and try again.

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    One person picks three (movies, restaurants, events, etc.) that they would be happy with.

    The other person selects one out of the three.

    Alternate.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We do more layer, so it’s called 5-3-1.

      Person A picks five options.

      Person B eliminates two of them.

      Person A selects one of the three remaining.

      We alternate who gets to pick the five.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem is the catalog is functionally infinite. How can you feel like you’re making a good decision if you don’t exhaust a category?

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You don’t have to make a good decision. It’s 20-90 minutes of your life, not a fucking career.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem is the catalog is functionally infinite.

        It narrows down significantly by region, for restaurants, and by time frame, for events.

        Movies as a bit trickier, but you can ballpark that by genre and maybe “new releases” / “<streaming service>” / “criterion collection”

        If you’ve got a big enough pool, you’ll get plenty of crossover. “You just matched with a person who wants to go to a Knicks game, watch a horror movie, and dine out at Sopo Korean Eats” is going to get plenty of hits in Manhattan.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We tried that. My wife said my hours of research into restaurants was “low effort” so now she picks three and I choose