Literally survived Tiberius, Caligula and Nero in the span of a few decades.

We should have gone nuclear, at least for the short term.

I fully support solar and wind but I don’t think it’s a one size fits all at this point. I think solar needs to get a lot more efficient and better to cover all the applications that oil and gas and coal do.

Even renewables need mining (sadly) which has significant impacts.

What if we constantly subsidized industries that made our climate unlivable?

Nuclear is a sound option. We already deal with mining wastes that must be managed in perpetuity. Nuclear waste isn’t much different in that regard.

Your point about landscapes also happens in mining.

George Foreman better watch out

Oh hey it’s me: a shell of my former self and full of crap

Yep those ones.

Mine were bath toys for sure.

I had a jeep that changed colours from army green to bright yellow. Also an old school caddy that went from purple to pink. All metal; great toys

it’s hosted on the onion, and i’m unsure if I’m eating it.

I lived through this one, as a kid. It sucks all around. I’m now older than my parents when they split, and have an assload of insight into the matter. I carefully watched the whole thing unfold over 25 years, before I was out of the ordeal, living on my own, and away from watching the two people I cared about most be nothing but complete shitbags to one another.

They’re happy now, why can’t you also be happy with them?

Oh how wonderful, maybe at one point they can sit around the campfire, eat smores, and sing kumbaya

There is no way you should do this. Not only are you clearly having reservations to begin with, but you need to keep your dignity intact, too. The whole affair is just going to be rubbed in your face. You deserve better than that.

While your ex may be coming from a ‘good place’ she shouldn’t have asked, out of respect.

Your kid has feelings about the divorce but he’s going to have to adapt to this new reality that your ex chose for him

No, no, no. All things on the internet are 100% true.

20 lbs of foot long nails.

Could go with a box full of spring loaded snakes.

“When the USA sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people”

Mom?

@[email protected] c’mere for a second…

It might be low on iron, or overtraining

In a written summary of Tuesday’s ruling, the court said that Shell has a duty of care to limit its emissions, but it annulled the lower court’s decision because it was “unable to establish that the social standard of care entails an obligation for Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions by 45%, or some other percentage.

“There is currently insufficient consensus in climate science on a specific reduction percentage to which an individual company like Shell should adhere.”

We can’t determine that cutting your emissions would do anything beneficial, even though something would be better than doing nothing, but we will let you do nothing instead. Jesus.

Shell could meet that obligation by ceasing to trade in the fuels it purchases from third parties. Other companies would then take over that trade.

So how would that be a reduction? How are you going to quantify THAT as a reduction? If we are going with unquantifiable reductions, why don’t we go with direct emissions like originally planned.

Miami damp